Type Battle! Week 5 (2/13)
TYPE BATTLE: Week 5 (13 Feb)
Here’s your chance to stretch your type muscles on a weekly basis. Each game kicks off on Monday with a new challenge, and closes at midnight PST on Friday. Anyone may submit a design response to the challenge. You may enter as often as you wish. Post anytime. Critiques and comments are welcome throughout the game, from participants and spectators alike. Smack talk is encouraged.
Winner take all, no holds barred. May be the best designer win.
Link directly to this thread: http://www.typophile.com/battle05
Requirements:
- Size: 600 width x 400 height. 72 dpi
- Color: Black and white only
- Format: Please save your graphics as PNG
- Only respond with the characters posted in the challenge.
// THIS WEEK’S CHALLENGE:
// Using ONLY the following MICR specimen as reference, design 5 characters of an accompanying alphabet.














13.Feb.2006 1.16am
Wow! I’m looking forward to all the quirky, asymmetrical creations that people will come up with. This’ll be a fun one!
13.Feb.2006 9.40am
Yay! First entry. Ever.
—æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ—
“Wishers and woulders be small householders.”
—Wynkyn de Worde
13.Feb.2006 10.14am
nice beans!
13.Feb.2006 3.26pm
That’s my first attempt... ever...
i hate the “a”
13.Feb.2006 3.27pm
why is it so big? and why is the color different from yours?
:(
13.Feb.2006 6.48pm
are you sure you made it black?
13.Feb.2006 8.02pm
I see black on white, 600 pixels wide.
14.Feb.2006 1.16am
Ah, well: other people seem to have actually set a word - I just did “loose” letters, and stuck within the cap-to-baseline height. Still, here it is (note the instructions didn’t say it had to be the Roman alphabet):
(Upsilon, phi, chi, psi, omega)
I realised only afterwards that I’d only done (more or less) symmetrical letters: no cowardice intended, honest guys. Let’s see someone give us some Cyrillic though...! (or, hey Hrant how about some “MICRmenian”?)
_______________________________________
Ever since I chose to block pop-ups, my toaster’s stopped working.
14.Feb.2006 1.29am
i am sure it’s black on illustrator but then i copied it to photoshop :/ did i do anything wrong? + the size is too big (?)
14.Feb.2006 1.29am
The “gloves” are very nice!
14.Feb.2006 2.12am
Alia,
It has to do with how Illustrator deals with CMYK black versus RGB black. One of the black defaults in Illustrator is a “rich black” composed of different levels of C, M, Y, and K. The other is C0 M0 Y0 K100, and shows up as a very dark grey. In the most recent version of Illustrator, you can change how it handles black as far as displaying, printing, and exporting to other applications.
Alternately, you can always just save the image from Illustrator using the “Save for Web” feature; it is extremely handy. Just set your crop marks in advance.
- Josh
—æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ——æ—
“Wishers and woulders be small householders.”
—Wynkyn de Worde
14.Feb.2006 3.13am
Tim
14.Feb.2006 4.00am
Ha ha, like it, Tim.
_________________________________________
Ever since I chose to block pop-ups, my toaster’s stopped working.
14.Feb.2006 6.58am
Please help!- answer - how to post a pictures on forum messages?
14.Feb.2006 7.06am
The Flash 8 player plug-in must be installed. When it is, you will see an “Insert Image” link just below the comment box.
14.Feb.2006 7.18am
Mark, thank you.
14.Feb.2006 7.40am
14.Feb.2006 8.01am
Everybody went straight for the lowercase! I was gonna get to that later, but here’s my opening salvo:
14.Feb.2006 8.38am
Josh, thank you
14.Feb.2006 9.10am
Another quick&dirty way is to copy and paste your paths into a shape layer in Pshop...
14.Feb.2006 4.30pm
14.Feb.2006 6.36pm
15.Feb.2006 7.15am
can anyone read my submission up there? Hope it’s not mistaken as “gloves”
15.Feb.2006 7.46am
...that’s in reply to Alia, right? Don’t worry, I read “flavor” Ok.
(He said, holding his breath...)
_______________________________
Ever since I chose to block pop-ups, my toaster’s stopped working.
15.Feb.2006 10.35am
Koleslaw, I definitely see “gloves.” The r and o is very apparent, however, it’s the f that throws me off. It looks just like a g.
15.Feb.2006 10.45am
I read flavor the first time but now I’m all confused.
In that spirit, I’m gonna pull a page from Week 1:
15.Feb.2006 11.27am
flavor is right. thanks! nice travel- bonus points for the ambigram ..
15.Feb.2006 12.04pm
Here for the second time and here´s something for the first time
15.Feb.2006 4.05pm
I definitely read flavor and I really dig it, it fits in every way that is good. The structure of the ’f’ totally rocks my world.
15.Feb.2006 4.47pm
note the instructions didn’t say it had to be the Roman alphabet
Indeed. Quickly and strangely:
15.Feb.2006 4.51pm
Ah that will be tought to beat. :^)
15.Feb.2006 4.57pm
Aye. Can anyone explain the function of the wide chunks hanging off the MCRI numerals? My first thought was that the verticals with the lighter stroke weight would be too thin for the magnetic readers, and the ’chunks’ serve to distinguish characters from one another... but look at the 2 and the 5; they’re almost exactly alike without the vertical strokes, so the reader must be able to perceive strokes that thin.
15.Feb.2006 5.44pm
John, that is very cool. What does it say?
15.Feb.2006 6.01pm
Dan — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MICR
There’s quite a bit there, although they don’t explain exactly what the rationale of thick and thin pattern is.
15.Feb.2006 6.52pm
Dan & Mark - http://www.printerm.com/micrdef.htm
This page may explain the purpose of the thick/thin patterns.
It seems that the MICR readers detect the presence of the magnetic ink over time. I suppose the thin/thick patterns of the E-13B helps differentiate each figure in order to increase the speed and accuracy of the face. The page I linked above seems to provide a technical explaination for the varying widths of the characters.
Also, it is interesting to see how different the other MICR typefaces are, especially the CMC-7 below. It even has an accompanying alphabet !
Image from www.morovia.com
16.Feb.2006 1.30am
John i am assuming you read Arabic, right? it’s a very good one in terms of readability.
Mark, it says: i created tension
16.Feb.2006 2.28pm
Why so few entries this week?
17.Feb.2006 12.51am
I don’t actually read Arabic. I know how to pronounce the individual letters, but without vowels I can’t pronounce words.
I just selected three words at random from a BBC Arabic news story. They were not even consecutive words, so if they do express anything meaningful it is entirely by chance.
17.Feb.2006 5.38am
17.Feb.2006 4.06pm
I liked Delicious; I could see a face based around that consistent black blob hanging out in the lower-left corners of the characters. I have a feeling, though, that if I read Arabic John would get my vote for top honors. Wonder how a magnetic reader would do with that puppy...
17.Feb.2006 4.25pm
I feel so out of touch with the type battle this week.
There have been some very cool entries, kudos to all.
John definitely gets my vote this week. Those are some lovely characters and much credit for submitting something non-latin. The same goes for Dave (dtw) — it is very refreshing to see other alphabets!
Any ideas for future battles?
17.Feb.2006 5.03pm
> Any ideas for future battles?
of course
17.Feb.2006 5.42pm
Care to share your ideas?
typophile@punchcut.com
17.Feb.2006 6.15pm
of course....
20.Feb.2006 2.57am
Thanks Zara. I’d second Dan(pica pusher)’s comment about feeling that John’s Arabic gets top vote for originality, despite not knowing whether Arabic readers would find it legible or not!
I finished the rest of the Greek during the week, btw if anybody’s interested:
Await the new week’s challenge with baited breath...
Ever since I chose to block pop-ups, my toaster’s stopped working.
20.Feb.2006 6.26am
whoa. my vote’s for dtw’s greek alphabet...very cryptic & cool.
21.Feb.2006 4.56am
They are all brilliant. Why don’t we spec. actual jobs here so I can spend more time at the beach!?
21.Feb.2006 9.54am
Is there going to be a new battle?