<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Gill Sans - Moving Forward from - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Gill Sans - Moving Forward from&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>&gt;very accomodating
In our</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150#comment-118171</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;very accomodating&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In our local Whole Foods, the signs are large, burnished metal Scala Sans letters. And things being what they are, I would suspect that this is true in many, many of their shops. They look great.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:55:39 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>William Berkson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 118171 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>it isn’t sufficiently</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150#comment-118167</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;it isn’t sufficiently reticent to use for lots of things.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve found it very accomodating.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:49:43 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick Shinn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 118167 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>But Scala Sans is so much</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150#comment-118150</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;But Scala Sans is so much less geometrically efficient than Gill Sans: it isn&amp;#8217;t sufficiently reticent to use for lots of things.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:09:05 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>George Horton</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 118150 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I”m definatley going to</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150#comment-118104</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8221;m definatley going to second the Scala Sans suggestion.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 15:11:14 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Hildebrant</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 118104 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I’ve grown fond of</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150#comment-117903</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve grown fond of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.typofonderie.com/alphabets/view/Parisine/?lang=en&quot;&gt;Parisine&lt;/a&gt; last time I was in Paris.&lt;br /&gt;
I don&amp;#8217;t know if that is too much forward but it has an a with a tail and a double storey g.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:53:04 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>moyogo</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 117903 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I am also in LOVE with Nobel</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150#comment-117852</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I am also in LOVE with Nobel from Font Bureau but it&amp;#8217;ll have to wait until I win the lottery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fontbureau.com/fonts/Nobel&quot; title=&quot;http://www.fontbureau.com/fonts/Nobel&quot;&gt;http://www.fontbureau.com/fonts/Nobel&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 07:23:31 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>pattyfab</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 117852 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Having extensively used both</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150#comment-117665</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Having extensively used both the Gill Sans family and the Scala Sans family, in a complex editorial environment, I would say that Scala Sans is the logical next step for a humanist sans, especially given its large typographic range, including condensed, small caps, figure alternatives, and hands!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m not sure whether you&amp;#8217;d consider this a small or large step from Gill Sans. Obviously faces like Bliss, Agenda, and English Grotesque are closer.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:36:05 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick Shinn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 117665 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jackson,
Thank you.
Tim
</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150#comment-117662</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Jackson,&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you.&lt;br /&gt;
Tim&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 09:29:45 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>timd</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 117662 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>John Sans is great, but I</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150#comment-117645</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;John Sans is great, but I think Dyna Grotesk is gorgeous! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stormtype.com/typefaces-fonts-shop/index.php&quot;&gt;Both at Stormtype.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:48:31 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Miss Tiffany</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 117645 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I’d hafta place my votes</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150#comment-117641</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;d hafta place my votes on John Sans, Sebastian &amp;amp; Proxima Nova&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:27:46 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>paul d hunt</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 117641 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150#comment-117639</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.monotypefonts.com/PDFs/OTPGill.pdf&quot; title=&quot;http://www.monotypefonts.com/PDFs/OTPGill.pdf&quot;&gt;http://www.monotypefonts.com/PDFs/OTPGill.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
There is an alternate 1&lt;br /&gt;
but the lowercase d is still inconsistent and the osf are wack&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:17:08 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jackson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 117639 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Scala Sans would be near the</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150#comment-117635</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Scala Sans would be near the top of my list as an essential humanist sans:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fontshop.com/?fuseaction=catalog.fontpackage&amp;amp;searchby=manufacturer&amp;amp;displayfontid=FF.11572.0.0&quot; title=&quot;http://www.fontshop.com/?fuseaction=catalog.fontpackage&amp;amp;searchby=manufacturer&amp;amp;displayfontid=FF.11572.0.0&quot;&gt;http://www.fontshop.com/?fuseaction=catalog.fontpackage&amp;amp;searchby=manufac...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The same designer&amp;#8217;s more recent Nexus Sans has a little more of the stone-cut look of Gill Sans. It might be a better design:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fontshop.com/?fuseaction=catalog.fontpackage&amp;amp;searchby=manufacturer&amp;amp;displayfontid=FF.11565.0.0&quot; title=&quot;http://www.fontshop.com/?fuseaction=catalog.fontpackage&amp;amp;searchby=manufacturer&amp;amp;displayfontid=FF.11565.0.0&quot;&gt;http://www.fontshop.com/?fuseaction=catalog.fontpackage&amp;amp;searchby=manufac...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stormtype&amp;#8217;s John Sans is also a really good font. It has a lovely shape, and is still English at its root, so it is sort of related to Gill in a roundabout way. I would recommend this one to everyone:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stormtype.com/typefaces-fonts-shop/typeface.php?id=187&quot; title=&quot;http://www.stormtype.com/typefaces-fonts-shop/typeface.php?id=187&quot;&gt;http://www.stormtype.com/typefaces-fonts-shop/typeface.php?id=187&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a few Foundry fonts that come to mind, like Sterling:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foundrytypes.co.uk/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.foundrytypes.co.uk/&quot;&gt;http://www.foundrytypes.co.uk/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:05:29 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>NiceTry</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 117635 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Does Gill Sans Pro have an</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150#comment-117571</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Does Gill Sans Pro have an alternative 1 (apart from the osf)? I couldn&amp;#8217;t see one on the graphic and it is one of the most annoying numerals to use.&lt;br /&gt;
Tim&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 02:04:15 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>timd</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 117571 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Gill Sans is said to be</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150#comment-117509</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Gill Sans is said to be humanist design, so a more recent humanist sans may be the go, How &amp;#8217;bout &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fontshop.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=verity.search&amp;amp;searchstr=thesis&amp;amp;ctid=4&quot; target=&quot;_new&quot;&gt;Thesis&lt;/a&gt;? The &amp;#8220;basic&amp;#8221; version even has a binocular g.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;j a m e s&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:52:12 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Arboghast</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 117509 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>10%:
Johnston</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150#comment-117500</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;10%:&lt;br /&gt;
Johnston &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.identifont.com/show?6T8/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.identifont.com/show?6T8/&quot;&gt;http://www.identifont.com/show?6T8/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tschichold &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.identifont.com/show?5SK/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.identifont.com/show?5SK/&quot;&gt;http://www.identifont.com/show?5SK/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
eric sans &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fountain.nu/catalogue/ericsans.asp&quot; title=&quot;http://www.fountain.nu/catalogue/ericsans.asp&quot;&gt;http://www.fountain.nu/catalogue/ericsans.asp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
caspari &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dutchtypelibrary.nl/CaspariRegular.html&quot; title=&quot;http://www.dutchtypelibrary.nl/CaspariRegular.html&quot;&gt;http://www.dutchtypelibrary.nl/CaspariRegular.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:38:54 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>geraintf</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 117500 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Gill Sans - Moving Forward from</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/19150</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What are some typefaces you guys would recommend looking at if you wanted to move from using Gill Sans, forward in a more contemporary direction, say 10% forward (perhaps another more recently designed humanist sans) and maybe some directions that move more radically in a different direction but hint at the origins?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not sure I put it very eloquently, so I hope I&amp;#8217;ve got my point across.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Basically, suggestions for a small move forward from Gill Sans, and also suggestions for a large leap forward as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eg, off the top of my head a small move might be myriad, scala, meta or frutiger, a large move perhaps legato, DIN, helvetica?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway, any suggestions appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Christian&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/19150#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/5">Design</category>
 <pubDate>Sun,  9 Apr 2006 23:32:19 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christian Teniswood</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">19150 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
