<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Semi-serif with serifs? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/33396</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Semi-serif with serifs?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I would say that letters</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/33396#comment-200401</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I would say that letters themselves are artificial, so the negative connotation you imply is needless. I would have to say, from my limited experience, that the skeleton approach is just one of many methods, and has some validity.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  1 May 2007 22:22:50 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Choz Cunningham</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 200401 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In fact seeing letters are</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/33396#comment-200211</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In fact seeing letters are skeletons that may or may not&lt;br /&gt;
have serifs tacked on is very artificial and short-sighted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hhp&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:55:51 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>hrant</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 200211 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Because screen resolution is</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/33396#comment-200206</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Because screen resolution is still dismal, I am assuming the “edge” of design is still on paper.&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ab edge exists on the web, but there seems to be a gap between the kind of designers who create and/or appreciate great edgy digital design and designers who focus on print. In my case I ignore it because I just do not have the time to sift through bas Web 2.0 sites and Flashturbation to find the good stuff.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Personally I feel that the serifs on some characters are just important parts of the character of the letter, particularly &lt;em&gt;I&lt;/em&gt;. While they may have originally appeared to clean up rough stroke ends or simply as ornament, I feel like they have become an integral part of some letters over time and that we are often better off when some of those critical serifs, tails, and loops are left in.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:25:26 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Puckett</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 200206 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Unlike i or l, the serif in</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/33396#comment-200201</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Unlike i or l, the serif in G seems much more accepted in a sans serif font.  Similarly, the tail of the t is also very common.  Does anyone know about the history of why these adoptions to a pure sans serif font have become more accepted?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:54:21 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sgh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 200201 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Koch Antiqua is an example</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/33396#comment-200126</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Koch Antiqua is an example of a serif face with a few &amp;#8220;missing&amp;#8221; serifs, and other early 20th century faces, eg Parsons, have semi-serifs.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:16:03 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick Shinn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 200126 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The earliest case I know of</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/33396#comment-200113</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The earliest case I know of somebody explicitly mixing up&lt;br /&gt;
serifs for reasons of functionality is Otl Aicher in Rotis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Things like a curl in the &amp;#8220;el&amp;#8221; don&amp;#8217;t qualify, I don&amp;#8217;t think.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hhp&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:54:09 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>hrant</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 200113 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In the case of a typeface</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/33396#comment-200031</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In the case of a typeface like &amp;#8217;Meta&amp;#8217; I wouldn&amp;#8217;t call this &amp;#8217;some serifs&amp;#8217; — the diversification of uc i en lowercase l in sans serifs has a long tradition: Johnston&amp;#8217;s London Underground comes to mind…&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 08:42:35 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bert_vanderveen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 200031 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>By those dates are you</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/33396#comment-200029</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By those dates are you suggesting that it is an artifact of mid-90’s design, or a quick trend come and gone?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can&amp;#8217;t say.&lt;br /&gt;
Those are uses that quickly came to mind, probably because one tends to remember something from when it first registers as a phenomenon. I doubt whether such things would strike me as being so noteworthy now.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 08:36:25 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick Shinn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 200029 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>By those dates are you</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/33396#comment-200002</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By those dates are you suggesting that it is an artifact of mid-90&amp;#8217;s design, or a quick trend come and gone?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because screen resolution is still dismal, I am assuming the &amp;#8220;edge&amp;#8221; of design is still on paper.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 05:44:25 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Choz Cunningham</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 200002 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Load-bearing:
The special</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/33396#comment-199972</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Load-bearing:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The special issue of Wired that came out in the mid-nineties, very texty &amp;#8212; lots of spreads with just a few sentences of really huge body copy &amp;#8212; set entirely in TheMix.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, annual reports of that era set in FF Letter Gothic Text, which is the proportionally-spaced version of what is primarily a monospace design.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:48:52 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nick Shinn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 199972 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I suppose another related</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/33396#comment-199954</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I suppose another related inquiry is, are there effective examples of these &amp;#8220;load-bearing&amp;#8221; semi-serifs being used in high resolution media where a more classical sans would have had equal clarity and similar connotation?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 19:29:30 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Choz Cunningham</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 199954 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Semi-serif with serifs?</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/33396</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I was pondering the influence of contemporary faces on the perceptions of &amp;#8220;proper&amp;#8221; letter forms. Specifically, the trend to include &amp;#8220;some serifs&amp;#8221; to distinguish things like the l, 1, I and i in sans faces. Nick mentions the trend &lt;a href=&quot;http://typophile.com/node/33301&quot;&gt;in this other thread&lt;/a&gt;. Another example might be the little right angle hook on some Js.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are there serifed faces that have begun to draw from this trend? Examples, thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/33396#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/4">General Discussions</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 19:26:21 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Choz Cunningham</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">33396 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
