<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Paganini by Alessandro Butti - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Paganini by Alessandro Butti&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Does anyone have a sample of</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612#comment-256699</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone have a sample of some punctuation from the Paganini font? I simply don&amp;#8217;t have any in any of the samples I&amp;#8217;ve dug up. Again, this is just for my personal use.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  6 Feb 2008 06:47:51 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>metalfoot</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 256699 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yes, I meant the weight of</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612#comment-256671</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, I meant the weight of the typeface itself. I don’t think there’s any sort of blackletter sensibility at play, but I admit my knowledge of these forms at the moment is very limited.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  6 Feb 2008 04:21:56 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>verbosus</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 256671 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ruano is basically an</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612#comment-256669</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ruano is basically an upright cancelleresca, systematized into a typeface.&lt;br /&gt;
By &amp;#8220;black&amp;#8221; Antonio means that&amp;#8217;s pretty heavy in weight, I think, compared to the cancelleresca calligraphy. I have the original specimen of Ruano, and although I don&amp;#8217;t like so much the lowercase it is undoubtedly an original typeface, even more, considered it was designed in 1926.&lt;br /&gt;
I was incredibly surprised to see some uppercase forms I have incorporated into my old Exegetic are amazingly similar to Ruano (the uppercase R and S, the lowercase S).&lt;br /&gt;
I think - willingly or not - these forms got in the blood of us Italians, even if the faces were maybe not so extensively used (Ruano was not so ubiquitous as Paganini or Semplicità).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  6 Feb 2008 04:20:08 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>piccic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 256669 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks very much! Thats</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612#comment-256665</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks very much! Thats quite interesting! By &amp;#8220;black&amp;#8221; do you mean the weight itself or a bit of a blackletter sensibility? Or a bit of each?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  6 Feb 2008 03:28:29 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eben Sorkin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 256665 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The picture is not very good</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612#comment-256664</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The picture is not very good I’m afraid, but hopefully it should give you an idea of the typeface:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;imageWrap&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/ruano_3863.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  6 Feb 2008 03:19:10 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>verbosus</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 256664 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Eben: yes, it’s a pretty</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612#comment-256654</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Eben: yes, it’s a pretty obscure typeface. Think of an upright chancery italic, pretty black. Me and Claudio where looking at it last week together and although it was promoted for text work (albeit short texts), we thought it was much more suited for display.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  6 Feb 2008 01:09:21 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>verbosus</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 256654 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I can’t seem to find any</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612#comment-256561</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I can&amp;#8217;t seem to find any images of Ruano. Is there a misspelling? Or is the work really obscure?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  5 Feb 2008 15:51:52 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eben Sorkin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 256561 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ruano (also by Raffarello</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612#comment-256525</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ruano (also by Raffarello Bertieri) rocks!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  5 Feb 2008 12:40:58 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>verbosus</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 256525 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>So I would like to hear what</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612#comment-256521</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So I would like to hear what Hrant would think about other faces designed by Raffaello Bertieri, since many of them seem more interested in recovery of historical letters within a &amp;#8220;romantic&amp;#8221; conception.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  5 Feb 2008 12:38:20 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>piccic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 256521 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hrant,
This is wonderful, to</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612#comment-256522</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hrant,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is wonderful, to hear that you&amp;#8217;re doing a non-literal revival. I&amp;#8217;m sure it&amp;#8217;ll be great!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To hone my skills at working on such things, I&amp;#8217;m creating a for-my-use-only digitization. Learning a lot about how letters work just from the up-close-and-personal work with this typeface!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  5 Feb 2008 12:36:19 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>metalfoot</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 256522 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>For Hrant I think it isn’t</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612#comment-256516</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For Hrant I think it isn&amp;#8217;t an aesthetically related epithet. When he has used the term in the past it had to do with his sense of the intent of the type maker. If the choices ( florid or no ) were in his eyes aimed at better reading then they were craft. If not, artsy as in for personal expression. The modern/Bodoni look is the aesthetic that I have seen Hrant attracted to over time. Fleischmann &amp;amp; Paganini both have it. Hrant, feel free to correct this if it is mistaken.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  5 Feb 2008 12:18:39 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eben Sorkin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 256516 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I’m very surprised to hear</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612#comment-256487</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m very surprised to hear your appreciation of Paganini, Hrant.&lt;br /&gt;
Although very well drawn I thought you could consider it too &amp;#8220;artsy&amp;#8221;.&lt;br /&gt;
What do you mean by &amp;#8220;non-literal&amp;#8221;? Are you using it as a staring point?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  5 Feb 2008 11:27:38 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>piccic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 256487 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>In this case, espresso!</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612#comment-256403</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In this case, espresso!  :-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hhp&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  5 Feb 2008 06:43:53 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>hrant</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 256403 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nice to see your post Hrant!</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612#comment-256336</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Nice to see your post Hrant! Paganini does look like your cup of tea.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon,  4 Feb 2008 22:59:12 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eben Sorkin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 256336 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Alex, I’m actually working</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612#comment-256334</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Alex, I&amp;#8217;m actually working on a (non-literal) revival of Paganini.&lt;br /&gt;
I haven&amp;#8217;t seen any phototype or digital samples of it, but frankly&lt;br /&gt;
I wouldn&amp;#8217;t expect much of them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most of my reference samples are in fact from Mardersteig&amp;#8217;s books,&lt;br /&gt;
although I&amp;#8217;ve also found great repro (like of the Filettata cut) in&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#8220;Encyclopaedia Typographica&amp;#8221; by A J Bastien et alia (1961).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hhp&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon,  4 Feb 2008 22:14:47 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>hrant</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 256334 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Paganini by Alessandro Butti</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/41612</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Was reading through Rookledge&amp;#8217;s Type Finder and came across this typeface. I&amp;#8217;m simply curious if it&amp;#8217;s ever been digitized and if not, why not? It looks like a decent face.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/41612#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/4">General Discussions</category>
 <pubDate>Fri,  1 Feb 2008 08:24:03 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>metalfoot</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">41612 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
