<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - OpenType website against Microsoft guidlines - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/43080</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;OpenType website against Microsoft guidlines&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>we won’t have any problem</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/43080#comment-265363</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;cite&gt;we won’t have any problem getting them back&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The subtext reminds me of this Simpsons &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.simpsoncrazy.com/scripts/das-bus.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;episode&lt;/a&gt; (search for &amp;#8217;Bill Gates&amp;#8217;) with Bill Gates visiting Homer &amp;#8212; accompanied by two assistants equipped with baseball bats or something like that.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;:D&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:02:47 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>k.l.</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 265363 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>My personal opinion (which</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/43080#comment-265325</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;My personal opinion (which obviously doesn&amp;#8217;t match the official Microsoft position) is that if and when we ever legitimately need those domains (for example if there&amp;#8217;s an OpenType Consortium set up at some point) we won&amp;#8217;t have any problem getting them back. In the meantime I personally don&amp;#8217;t have a problem with MTI or Ralf looking after those domains, especially if they&amp;#8217;re using them to promote OpenType and type design in general.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:39:35 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sii</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 265325 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What about opentype.com</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/43080#comment-265318</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What about opentype.com forwarding to Monotype!? ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All the top level domains for Opentype.something are taken. I guess the main reason for Microsoft to register such a trademark is, that no one else can do it.  I don&amp;#8217;t expect Microsoft to sue all of the domain owners.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:58:48 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ralf Herrmann</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 265318 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>OpenType website against Microsoft guidlines</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/43080</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have just notice FontBolaget have a new website:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opentype.se&quot; title=&quot;http://www.opentype.se&quot;&gt;http://www.opentype.se&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Using OpenType in the domain name goes against the Microsoft trademark guidelines for OpenType.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/intellectualproperty/trademarks/usage/opentype.mspx&quot; title=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/intellectualproperty/trademarks/usage/opentype.mspx&quot;&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/intellectualproperty/trademarks/usa...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I wonder how long they will be able to keep that website going for.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/43080#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/4">General Discussions</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:10:19 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>malcolm</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43080 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
