<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Pixel (Flash) Fonts VS Illustrator CS - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Pixel (Flash) Fonts VS Illustrator CS&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>In Illustrator CS3, you</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755#comment-293857</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In Illustrator CS3, you select the option View &amp;gt; Pixel preview. And everything placed in an exact o half pixel (,5) in the X an Y axis gets rendered sharp and crisp.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  6 Aug 2008 12:02:10 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Landitus</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 293857 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I would think that would</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755#comment-276212</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I would think that would work - *if* your output resolution was a multiple of your grid resolution. So for example if your grid is point-based, and you export at 100 ppi, the grid won&amp;#8217;t help. But if you export at 72 ppi, it would.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;T&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  1 May 2008 12:37:13 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Thomas Phinney</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 276212 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Something else that may be</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755#comment-276127</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Something else that may be useful: In Indy you should use a full point–grid &amp;amp; lock/place all elements on this. Makes for more consistent anti-aliasing when rendering to pixels.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;. . .&lt;br /&gt;
Bert Vanderveen BNO&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  1 May 2008 08:51:31 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bert_vanderveen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 276127 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No problem!
Peace, and</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755#comment-275963</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;No problem!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Peace, and thanks again to all!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:32:25 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>krissserz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 275963 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No problem!
Peace to all!</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755#comment-275962</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;No problem!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Peace to all!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:32:13 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>krissserz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 275962 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Please forgive me if I came</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755#comment-275817</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Please forgive me if I came across harsh. Good luck with your work, Krissserz!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:25:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>frode frank</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 275817 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>To be frank, I really</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755#comment-275739</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;To be frank, I really don&amp;#8217;t think this is the matter of the subject here, but I&amp;#8217;ll still take time to answer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s simple: I&amp;#8217;m used to Illustrator to design with. I don&amp;#8217;t want to waste too much time having to get used to Flash&amp;#8217;s tools. I work on a MAC, and my programmer works on a PC. So I have to break apart the fonts anyway when I give him the Flash docs. (Please don&amp;#8217;t ask anymore questions relating to our/my method of work... It would be too long and not on the subject. Thanks. We all have our own ways of working for a lot of different reasons. That&amp;#8217;s it, that&amp;#8217;s all.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Illustrator is vector-based, and so is Flash. I think it&amp;#8217;s logical.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What wouldn&amp;#8217;t be logical, would be to design the interior of a novel with Photoshop for obvious reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:06:49 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>krissserz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 275739 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I’m no evangelists on</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755#comment-275684</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m no evangelists on these matters, but I find it good to take use of the internet&amp;#8217;s possibilities. Flash is, btw, an amazing tool.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:30:43 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>frode frank</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 275684 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Frode, what’s all this</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755#comment-275606</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Frode, what&amp;#8217;s all this &amp;#8220;if you care about usability, that is&amp;#8221; stuff? Much as I venerate usability ( and I do you know...) the world is not made of usability alone. Not all individuals or business&amp;#8217; want or would even benefit from usability alone.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:24:48 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eben Sorkin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 275606 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I don’t want to kill the</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755#comment-275534</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#8217;t want to kill the spirit, but if you&amp;#8217;re using Illustrator to design your sites there&amp;#8217;s a good chance you don&amp;#8217;t really need Flash. One can remake any AI with just plain old html/css – if you care about usability, that is.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 15:15:40 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>frode frank</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 275534 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Great! I’ll try that!
Much</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755#comment-275526</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Great! I&amp;#8217;ll try that!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Much appreciated. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:33:59 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>krissserz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 275526 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>(I didn’t know about this</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755#comment-275505</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;(I didn&amp;#8217;t know about this rasterize effect, either, until now. Pretty neat.)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:14:20 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark Simonson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 275505 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>You can save a little time</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755#comment-275504</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;You can save a little time by saving the effect as a graphic style, which is very simple to do: Select one of your already-rasterized text boxes and drag it to the graphic styles palette. This will create a blank white icon in the graphic styles palette. When you select a text box and click on the icon, the same rasterize effect settings will be applied. Since a blank white icon is not very identifiable, it helps to give it a name (double click on it) and set the graphic styles palette to one of the list views.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:13:39 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark Simonson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 275504 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks.
This seems to be the</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755#comment-275501</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This seems to be the solution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I still find it weird that I&amp;#8217;ll need to do that extra step everytime I&amp;#8217;ll create another text box, but if it works, ok then! (It probably would&amp;#8217;ve been better to have a &amp;#8220;crisp/smooth&amp;#8221; option in the Type palette like in Photoshop, but still...)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seems like this is it! Peace!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:33:35 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>krissserz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 275501 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Effect &gt; Rasterize
Here is a</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755#comment-275496</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Effect &amp;gt; Rasterize&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://veerle.duoh.com/blog/comments/the_rasterize_effect_on_text_in_illustrator/&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; is a tutorial.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:20:20 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Manlio Napoli</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 275496 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pixel (Flash) Fonts VS Illustrator CS</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/44755</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hello!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pixel fonts are blurry in all of the CS versions of Illustrator, even if placed at full x/y values. Seems like the only Illustrator versions that shows pixel fonts the crispy way are Illustrator 10 and below. (I wrote to Adobe about it last year [2007, or even 2006], and I still didn’t get an answer [surprise!].)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know the trick for crispy looking pixel fonts in any of the CS versions? I’d like to design my Websites in Illustrator CS... I’m done with 10!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/44755#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/6">Build</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:21:58 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>krissserz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">44755 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
