Typophile - two id's - Comments

I agree with Achilles about

Endre Berentzen — Thu, 8 May 2008 04:11:36 -0700

I agree with Achilles about Bell Centennial’s beauty in big sizes. It is absolutely the quirkyness of the ink traps that attract me. It is what gives it just enough character to be interesting even in a corporate use.

Really? But the ink traps

cisfor — Thu, 8 May 2008 03:53:16 -0700

Really? But the ink traps are so quirky...is that what attracts you?

I think Bell Centennial is

AchillesG — Thu, 8 May 2008 02:21:07 -0700

I think Bell Centennial is gorgeous when blown up (I am well aware that that is not its intended purpose).

Great - thanks.

cisfor — Thu, 8 May 2008 01:15:24 -0700

Great - thanks.

Thanks - any ideas for the

cisfor — Thu, 8 May 2008 00:50:33 -0700

Thanks - any ideas for the first one - I know it’s ugly, but that’s why I need to identify it :)

First is indeed Bell

Stephen Coles — Thu, 8 May 2008 00:50:23 -0700

First is indeed Bell Centennial as you presumed.

Second is Kursivschrift.

Stephen Coles — Thu, 8 May 2008 00:48:09 -0700

Second is Kursivschrift.

‘Sheer’ is

akira1975 — Thu, 8 May 2008 00:48:01 -0700

‘Sheer’ is Kursivschrift.

two id's

cisfor — Thu, 8 May 2008 00:40:39 -0700

Hi everyone

Ok, I’m going to post two this time...

To me this looks like the one designed for the telephone book (don’t know why someone would blow it up and put it on a poster...)

This one’s from a club flyer.

Thanks for any hints.

Clinton