<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Good typeface for wooden/rubber stamps? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45250</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Good typeface for wooden/rubber stamps?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I’m not sure</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45250#comment-278383</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;cite&gt;I’m not sure ’stampage’ is a word.&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;@darrell: oh, I dunno, see OED online: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;dl&gt;
&lt;dt&gt;stampage&lt;/dt&gt;
&lt;dd&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The crushing (of tin-ore).&lt;br /&gt;
1910 Cal. Close Rolls an. 1365, 113, 1,000 marks every year to be taken of the issue of the stampage of tin in Cornwall.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A copy or impression (of an inscription) made by stamping.&lt;br /&gt;
1880 Encycl. Brit. XIII. 118/2 No copy was obtained [of the rock inscription] until October 1838, when the traveller Masson..made a calico stampage and an eye copy.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;/dd&gt;
&lt;/dl&gt;
&lt;p&gt;...there was a 3rd definition, but the 2nd one here approaches the usage in question, I suppose...&lt;br /&gt;
______________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
Ever since I chose to block pop-ups, my toaster&amp;#8217;s stopped working.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 06:40:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dtw</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278383 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I’m not sure</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45250#comment-277961</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m not sure &amp;#8217;stampage&amp;#8217; is a word.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;d go down to the arts and crafts/scrapbooking store and buy random stamps and try them out.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 11:59:07 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>aluminum</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 277961 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Howdy,
In retrospect, that</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45250#comment-277957</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Howdy,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In retrospect, that was a little vague - which may have something to do with the fact that I&amp;#8217;m quite inexperienced in the finer art of stamping.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m thinking I want to embrace the unpredictability of stampage, as some of our employees relative stampage techniques may, in fact, be quite garbage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it better to have a thinner face or a heavier one for better distribution? Is one easier to handle than the other?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does a goofy/ornate handle improve stampage in any way?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 11:45:35 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>richardeflanagan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 277957 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Good typeface for wooden/rubber stamps?</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45250</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hello all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve been tasked with developing a series of stamps for our studio to personalize otherwise anonymous business cards (we have many and they were expensive, I gather). Also would love here opinions on the pros cons of rubber/wood, and ink (think pads at staples) versus something perhaps more paint-ish.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks much!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/45250#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/5">Design</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 11:33:34 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>richardeflanagan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">45250 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
