<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Windows Font Managers (vista 64 bit) - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Windows Font Managers (vista 64 bit)&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Been using Maintype’s</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288#comment-279931</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Been using Maintype&amp;#8217;s trial for about a week now and not to bad. Think I will pick it up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the suggestion Arnold.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;p@&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 08:06:57 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Trick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 279931 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>This may be considered bad</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288#comment-279169</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;cite&gt;This may be considered bad grammar in the States — I wouldn’t know — but it’s fine over here!&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s perfectly acceptable in the States too. There&amp;#8217;s a difference in meaning (verb aspect, in this case) between the &amp;#8220;preterite&amp;#8221; (completed action) and the &amp;#8220;present perfect&amp;#8221; (something occurring in past that continues or relates to present) that works mostly the same, so far as I know, in both American and British standards of English. In this case, the latter verb form is useful to imply that the toaster still does not work.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 05:34:50 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>archaica</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 279169 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Trick, I recommed trying</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288#comment-279158</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Trick, I recommed trying High-Logic MainType. You&amp;#8217;ll find more info and trial at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.high-logic.com/maintype.html&quot; title=&quot;http://www.high-logic.com/maintype.html&quot;&gt;http://www.high-logic.com/maintype.html&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;br /&gt;
It should run OK on 64-bit Vista.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MainType is 49 USD but is currently up at a 50% discount on the discounts still availabe list over at: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.donationcoder.com/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.donationcoder.com/&quot;&gt;http://www.donationcoder.com/&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
You need to become a donating member in order to get the discount (but any donation will do).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MainType has been up at: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bitsdujour.com&quot; title=&quot;http://www.bitsdujour.com&quot;&gt;http://www.bitsdujour.com&lt;/a&gt; at a 60 % discount and it seems it will be again on 16 June 08: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bitsdujour.com/software/maintype/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.bitsdujour.com/software/maintype/&quot;&gt;http://www.bitsdujour.com/software/maintype/&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Trial MainType, add your mail addy to: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bitsdujour.com/software/maintype/notify/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.bitsdujour.com/software/maintype/notify/&quot;&gt;http://www.bitsdujour.com/software/maintype/notify/&lt;/a&gt; and you should be able to get MainType at a bargain price just a couple of days before the trial period ends.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BTW, I&amp;#8217;m in no way affiliated with Hig-Logic, but I&amp;#8217;ve tried all font managers for Windows, bought a few, and have fond myself using MainType only.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 04:20:08 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ACall</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 279158 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dave, it’s all good. I was</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288#comment-278404</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Dave, it&amp;#8217;s all good. I was just pointing out that the apostrophe and additional s, aren&amp;#8217;t needed. &amp;#8220;my toaster stopped working&amp;#8221;, would be grammatically better. I thought the joke was clever.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:12:02 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Asvetic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278404 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Shameful bump
p@</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288#comment-278397</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Shameful bump&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;p@&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 07:56:40 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Trick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278397 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>(Sorry for the sidetrack,</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288#comment-278329</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;(Sorry for the sidetrack, but Andrew: as Jonathan suggests, I&amp;#8217;m saying &amp;#8220;Since I did &lt;em&gt;X&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Y&lt;/em&gt; has happened.&amp;#8221; (I&amp;#8217;m certainly not claiming to have several toasters, which would be the implication without the apostrophe!) This may be considered bad grammar in the States &amp;#8212; I wouldn&amp;#8217;t know &amp;#8212; but it&amp;#8217;s fine over here! I&amp;#8217;ve never had anyone pull me up on apostrophe use before: it&amp;#8217;s one of my own bugbears! ... I should probably change this sig anyway, as it was a fairly weak joke to start with, but at least ’twas mine own!)&lt;br /&gt;
______________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
Ever since I chose to block pop-ups, my toaster&amp;#8217;s stopped working.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 01:19:51 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dtw</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278329 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Okay I just read that</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288#comment-278226</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Okay I just read that Extensis does not support the 64 bit version of vista, which is of coarse the version I run.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So any ideas for an alternative? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;p@&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:55:46 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Trick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278226 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Well fixed my typing problem</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288#comment-278205</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Well fixed my typing problem in firefox, had to run safe mode through terminal and reset everything to factory defaults and it fixed me right up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;p@&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:10:20 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Trick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278205 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>That’s what all the font</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288#comment-278201</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;cite&gt;That’s what all the font management programs do. They either add a copy or a link the fonts when you activate them in the system folder, then when you deactivate it deletes the copy/link.&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is only partly true. When modern font managers like Suitcase activate a font on Windows, they do so programmatically by modifying one of two different registry keys depending on the font type. If you look at C:\Windows\Fonts\ it will appear as though the directory contains shortcuts. This is the way Microsoft has chosen to represent the Windows font system. The fonts folder, though, is not a normal directory. The only way files can be added to it are though the Add Fonts dialog. So, the &amp;#8220;shortcuts&amp;#8221; are really created by Windows to represent the state of the font system, which is reasonable. After a font is added, other API calls are made to update the system and tell Windows to refresh the font menus of open applications. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This has varied somewhat over time as well. My understanding is that Suitcase 9.x did in fact do something similar to creating a shortcut. Suitcase 11 (Windows) does use the method I&amp;#8217;ve described however.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the Mac OS X side, there has always been a robust programming interface for font activation. As far as I know, nothing like a shortcut has ever been used.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:50:05 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>canderson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278201 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yes but this application did</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288#comment-278187</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yes but this application did not reset itself say like suitcase. Without keeping a record of which fonts you had installed and then going back and manually deleting these files, thy would become a permanent file in the system font folder, which bloated my system fonts on a day to day basis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes I could keep better record of which I had &amp;#8220;installed&amp;#8221;  but when I would accopy over several fonts in a design session I just don&amp;#8217;t seem to remember them all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway, guess I will just start saving for suitcase, as I am comfortable with it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;br /&gt;
p@&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 11:09:20 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Trick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278187 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>didn’t so much</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288#comment-278179</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;cite&gt;didn’t so much activate/deactivate fonts as it just installed them in the system folder, &lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#8217;s what all the font management programs do. They either add a copy or a link the fonts when you activate them in the system folder, then when you deactivate it deletes the copy/link.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 10:35:18 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Asvetic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278179 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No it was not Linotype’s,</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288#comment-278178</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;No it was not Linotype&amp;#8217;s, which I understand they stopped offering anyway?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It just had a horrible interface and didn&amp;#8217;t so much activate/deactivate fonts as it just installed them in the system folder, which I would like to avoid.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;p@&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 10:30:38 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Trick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278178 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Unless it’s a contraction</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288#comment-278174</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Unless it’s a contraction of “toaster has”&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#8217;s possible, but that&amp;#8217;s not necessary either. &amp;#8220;...has stopped...&amp;#8221; is poor grammar.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 10:23:45 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Asvetic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278174 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>“P.P.S. Dave, your</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288#comment-278171</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;P.P.S. Dave, your signature shouldn’t have the possessive toaster, just drop the ’s and it’ll be fine.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unless it&amp;#8217;s a contraction of &amp;#8220;toaster has&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 10:07:17 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jonathanhughes</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278171 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Was it Linotype Font</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288#comment-278170</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Was it Linotype Font Explorer X?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linotype.com/3321/freedownloadpc.html?PHPSESSID=474f6eb195ab089a58514f7e64b3d2a1&quot; title=&quot;http://www.linotype.com/3321/freedownloadpc.html?PHPSESSID=474f6eb195ab089a58514f7e64b3d2a1&quot;&gt;http://www.linotype.com/3321/freedownloadpc.html?PHPSESSID=474f6eb195ab0...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;P.S. I&amp;#8217;m also on Firefox and no problems for me.&lt;br /&gt;
P.P.S. Dave, your signature shouldn&amp;#8217;t have the possessive toaster, just drop the &amp;#8217;s and it&amp;#8217;ll be fine.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 10:02:38 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Asvetic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278170 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Windows Font Managers (vista 64 bit)</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45288</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hello, sorry if I am beating a dead horse here but I didn&amp;#8217;t find anything recent on this question.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I am looking for a good type manager for windows with out having to spend to much, or none at all :P&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I tried a free trial of a software I can&amp;#8217;t for the life of me remember the name of, but it was horrible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am a fan of extensis on my mac at work but don&amp;#8217;t have that budget at home.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any suggetions? Also using vista (64 bit) if that matters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cheers&lt;br /&gt;
P@&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ps anyone else having troubles typing in firefox here on typophile?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/45288#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/4">General Discussions</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 08:50:48 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Trick</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">45288 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
