<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - JetBlue is Back - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45295</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;JetBlue is Back&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I read this yesterday</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45295#comment-278711</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I read this yesterday afternoon, and this morning the Red Line (in Boston) was wall to wall with print versions of the Flash site.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 09:28:29 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ehague</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278711 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>JetBlue is Back</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45295</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.happyjetting.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3190/2490596606_84e6746f8e.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

I love a compelling brand story. And before I jump in, I need to confess my ties to the JetBlue brand, having once designed the logo, identity and airplane graphics (ahem, the livery design to use industry parlance) while I was at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.merkleyandpartners.com/&quot;&gt;Merkeley and Partners&lt;/a&gt;.

In the original JetBlue style guide we listed Trade Gothic as the corporate typeface. After its initial run, and long after I was no longer involved with the brand it went through a seemingly endless stretch using Futura Bold and  yellow (what were you guys thinking?!). Now, JetBlue is back to DIN and orange and their characteristic jab at the airline industry that I would like to think put them on the map. And no, I wasn&#039;t involved in the refresh, but I feel like JetBlue is somehow an offspring of mine and I so I&#039;m compelled to keep an eye on it. [More after the bump.]

I&#039;m typically not in favor of a corporate identity that uses a typeface for its logo and the same typeface for all of its materials. This detracts from a logotype. When the type system is not distinct the logo can disappear. But, I&#039;m even less in favor of Futura &lt;em&gt;anything&lt;/em&gt; and I also believe DIN works better for JetBlue than even Trade Gothic did. 

So what&#039;s up now? When the rest of the airline industry is hunkering down, waiting for consolidation you have Virgin America making a splash and JetBlue trying to refresh their brand. Check a recent article at AdAge, &lt;a href=&quot;http://adage.com/article.php?article_id=126890&quot;&gt;&quot;JetBlue Aims to Lift Fliers Above Industry&#039;s Hassles&quot;&lt;/a&gt;. JetBlue&#039;s wit is also back in full flavor. Check out the new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.happyjetting.com/&quot;&gt;HappyJetting.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.happyjetting.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2067/2490596428_75cfca659c.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.happyjetting.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3188/2489779217_ef6aa90cac.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.happyjetting.com/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2133/2490323020_48a7aa2be4.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/45295#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/54">Blog</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 13:33:29 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Pemberton</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">45295 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
