<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - ITC Lubalin Graph by Elsner+Flake vs ITC Lubalin Graph - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45375</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;ITC Lubalin Graph by Elsner+Flake vs ITC Lubalin Graph&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>IIRC Elsner+Flake own</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45375#comment-278810</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;IIRC Elsner+Flake own different data than that owned by Monotype so there will be subtle differences. I know Monotype seems to have more of the ligatures for Avant Garde than those of Elsner+Flake.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:16:37 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Miss Tiffany</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278810 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>well I have found out the</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45375#comment-278803</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;well I have found out the difference... and there is a difference not in the outline or the structure of the typeface...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 16:48:29 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>concrete</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278803 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>anyone?... (tumble weed...</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45375#comment-278780</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;anyone?... (tumble weed... dust... faint whistle?)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 14:51:57 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>concrete</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 278780 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITC Lubalin Graph by Elsner+Flake vs ITC Lubalin Graph</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45375</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi I am curious about the difference of the 2 versions ITC Lubalin Graph made by... is it simply licencing, is one better than the other, one more meticulous than the other?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ITC Lubalin Graph by Elsner+Flake (on FontShop)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fontshop.com/fonts/singles/elsner_flake/itc_lubalin_graph_bold/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.fontshop.com/fonts/singles/elsner_flake/itc_lubalin_graph_bold/&quot;&gt;http://www.fontshop.com/fonts/singles/elsner_flake/itc_lubalin_graph_bol...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;vs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ITC Lubalin Graph (on Monotype)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fonts.com/findfonts/detail.htm?pid=425731&amp;amp;gclid=CLeZw-6wqJMCFR0ZagodZhYAoA&quot; title=&quot;http://www.fonts.com/findfonts/detail.htm?pid=425731&amp;amp;gclid=CLeZw-6wqJMCFR0ZagodZhYAoA&quot;&gt;http://www.fonts.com/findfonts/detail.htm?pid=425731&amp;amp;gclid=CLeZw-6wqJMCF...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/45375#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/4">General Discussions</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 04:43:18 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>concrete</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">45375 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
