<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Pairing Type on a Mini Brochure - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45626</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Pairing Type on a Mini Brochure&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I agree. Nothing says</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45626#comment-291143</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. Nothing says &amp;#8220;unique&amp;#8221; and &amp;#8220;one-of-a-kind&amp;#8221; like a hand-drawn script.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; - Lex&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:30:57 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lex Kominek</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 291143 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Instead of using a script</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45626#comment-289962</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Instead of using a script font, why not just write the script text yourself...maybe get one other person to write the other script text and scan them both in? Possibly getting the client to write it? This will go along with the existing hand-drawn illustrations and pull everything together.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other than that, everything else looks great.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:12:56 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Oberlänge</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 289962 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Not about the</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45626#comment-289350</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Not about the type-pairing:&lt;br /&gt;
Nice drawings...&lt;br /&gt;
I would justify the text when you don&amp;#8217;t have square text-boxes... Are you going to replace the drawings with real footage? Will the text be inverted/negative?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:33:56 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ZUZ3L</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 289350 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I guess it would help to</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45626#comment-279964</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I guess it would help to provide the image. I&amp;#8217;m still getting the hang of this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;imageWrap&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/woman_1_5482.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 09:56:05 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MLucas</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 279964 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pairing Type on a Mini Brochure</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45626</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This small Z-fold brochure folds down to 3 x 4.25&amp;#8221; (with the cover title, &amp;#8220;The Unique Woman.&amp;#8221;)&lt;br /&gt;
I&amp;#8217;ve been trying to pair two complementary handwritten typefaces that work nicely with the brochure&amp;#8217;s artwork.&lt;br /&gt;
I&amp;#8217;ve used Prater-script and Handsome-nib and like them both, but I&amp;#8217;m not convinced they are the answer. I don&amp;#8217;t think the goal is for them to be written in the same &amp;#8220;hand,&amp;#8221; as much as it is for them to blend well with the free spirit of the piece and create an overall harmony.&lt;br /&gt;
Any feedback, suggestions or insight is appreciated—I&amp;#8217;ve never been involved in a forum before and I miss being part of a critique.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/45626#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/28">Typography / Composition</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 09:53:25 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>MLucas</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">45626 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
