<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Need help with logo font - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45716</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Need help with logo font&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Yeah, when I look at them</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45716#comment-280908</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, when I look at them side by side I see what you mean, but it&amp;#8217;s not grossly distorted, just a little wider/flatter. I&amp;#8217;m not trying to make an argument, my point was just that it&amp;#8217;s not too different than the font has looked for over 20 years. &amp;#8220;Really mangled&amp;#8221; is a matter of opinion, for sure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Mike Yanega&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 11:35:49 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bowfinpw</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280908 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>IDK Mike, take a look at</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45716#comment-280891</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;IDK Mike, take a look at that &amp;#8220;ed&amp;#8221; looks kinda &lt;a href=&quot;/wiki/squooshed&quot; class=&quot;wiki&quot;&gt;squooshed&lt;/a&gt; and stretched actually. It&amp;#8217;s just really mangled next to the Fontshop version.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:13:45 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Asvetic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280891 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Actually, that’s the extra</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45716#comment-280888</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, that&amp;#8217;s the extra bold weight, and it doesn&amp;#8217;t look like it&amp;#8217;s been distorted at all, other than spacing. The font is by Michael Neugebauer from 1980-87, according to the &amp;#8217;98 FontBook.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Mike Yanega&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:06:05 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bowfinpw</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280888 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I would have never guessed</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45716#comment-280872</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I would have never guessed that to be an actual typeface. It&amp;#8217;s obviously been extremely man-handled and stretched out of whack. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just curious Mike, what attracted you to this face? What do you have planned for it?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 07:52:33 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Asvetic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280872 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Squire</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45716#comment-280383</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a class=&quot;freelinking-external&quot; href=&quot;http://www.fontshop.com/fonts/singles/itc/squire_com_extra_bold/?sample_text=JustSheds&amp;amp;sample_size=74&quot;&gt;Squire&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 18:22:03 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>akira1975</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280383 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Need help with logo font</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45716</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;hi guys,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;anyone have an idea of the font used for this please...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks heaps&lt;br /&gt;
mike&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;imageWrap&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/JS logo - JPG_6575.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/45716#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/29">Type ID Board</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 15:12:52 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mike_from_nz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">45716 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
