<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - logo critique - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45740</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;logo critique&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Some variation on 2, bit</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45740#comment-280830</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Some variation on 2, bit colours need some work. Not too keen on the typeface either.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 01:36:49 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jim Stafford</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280830 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>1. without the fuse cord.</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45740#comment-280811</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;1. without the fuse cord.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 23:26:46 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>poms</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280811 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks Rainer, aluminiium &amp;</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45740#comment-280628</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Rainer, aluminiium &amp;amp; TDF, I&amp;#8217;ve added these comments to my list of things to look into.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JH&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 06:36:24 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jazzhustler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280628 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I like #1 as well. Graphic</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45740#comment-280553</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I like #1 as well. Graphic and simple. You could always have a 2nd reversed version - all red with no paint swash behind it.&lt;br /&gt;
I might also make the &amp;#8220;I&amp;#8221; a bit more like a firecracker, but you&amp;#8217;ve probably already tried that....&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 17:54:09 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>TDF</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280553 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>1</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45740#comment-280546</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;1&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 17:36:03 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>aluminum</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280546 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>When you add a rim like in</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45740#comment-280522</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When you add a rim like in #3 and #4, make sure it looks good. Right now, #4 reads FIREC-RAC-K’A. Remove the white from between C and R and between C and K, and don&amp;#8217;t let the white descend so far down like between the last two letters.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 15:04:15 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rainer Erich Scheichelbauer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280522 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks for all the comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45740#comment-280521</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for all the comments so far, it really makes contributing to these forums a joy, along with being a 2nd (3rd, 4th &amp;amp; 5th) opinion.  It also helps to arm me with professional opinions with respective clients, as I&amp;#8217;m sure you&amp;#8217;re aware, a lot of the time they either don&amp;#8217;t have the taste to tell good from bad, or don&amp;#8217;t really know what they want!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway, I&amp;#8217;ve got some more ideas to do, so thanks.  I&amp;#8217;d just like to address a couple of points made;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;innovati - I&amp;#8217;ll bear the &amp;#8217;phallic&amp;#8217; angle in mind!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Formlos - granted, the stick of dynamite does look clip-arty, but that was sort of the intent, and for the record, I constructed it from scratch in illustrator.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tezzutezzu - I think you&amp;#8217;re right with the thickness of the thread - good call.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;nmerriam - you&amp;#8217;re right about the fuse, so a change of colour should help.  You&amp;#8217;re right I&amp;#8217;ve never lit a fuse before let alone handle a stick of dynamite, so no surprise I got it wrong really.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So far, #1 seems to be favoured by most people here, and that has also found some favour with the client, so with your help I can now carry on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks so much to all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;peace&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simon.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 15:03:32 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jazzhustler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280521 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>with a TV production</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45740#comment-280516</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;with a TV production Company, I guess you&amp;#8217;d get to add some animation?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# 3 and 4  work well together for that, I think. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#3 animated ... fuse burns down / dynamite blows up - letters all over the place /  next screen in the credits, or what ever. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#4 as a static version.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#1 is nice and professional looking, and that may be why there are so many logos like that out there (grungy painted-with-a-roller background)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#2 this one feels too corporate for the spelling of &amp;#8220;Firecracka&amp;#8221; and the use of such an industrial strength stencil font. But, that said, it&amp;#8217;s just my two cents, #1 &amp;amp; #2 would also work together as dynamic and static versions of the same logo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-=®=-&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 14:11:24 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>russellm</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280516 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I really like the #1 and #2,</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45740#comment-280511</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I really like the #1 and #2, the #2 is even better &amp;#8217;cause you get rid of the bakground, besides, it will work great in two colors.&lt;br /&gt;
I&amp;#8217;ve to disagree with innovati, &amp;#8217;cause you can always use the I with the thread for small applications of the logo.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 13:40:14 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ilovecolors</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280511 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>well, with #1 you’d have</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45740#comment-280506</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;well, with #1 you&amp;#8217;d have to use that entire thing&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if you use #3 or #4 you could always use the dynamite alone as a logo for smaller applications where the entire logotype isn&amp;#8217;t needed, solution #1 doesn&amp;#8217;t allow for that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 13:26:42 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>innovati</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280506 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I agree on #1, it’s the</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45740#comment-280502</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree on #1, it&amp;#8217;s the most professional and straightforward to me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That said, I know video and web companies tend to prefer lots of color, 3D effects, etc because it looks &amp;#8220;cool&amp;#8221;. I suspect they&amp;#8217;ll like #3 best, and animated it offers a lot of possibilities. I would definitely get rid of the clip art firecracker, though, it&amp;#8217;s very, very clip art in feel and design. For one thing, replace the fuse since the current tone looks like a piece of rope from Home Depot (I&amp;#8217;m guessing it was done by someone who&amp;#8217;d never seen a fuse before), and light it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 13:23:52 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>nmerriam</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280502 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I’d say first one, maybe</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45740#comment-280494</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;d say first one, maybe with some correction on the dynamite thread (a little thicker?)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 13:08:03 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tezzutezzu</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280494 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Out of these I like the very</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45740#comment-280490</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Out of these I like the very first one (1). It&amp;#8217;s simple, one color, and probably the most powerful, out of the shown ones. &lt;em&gt;(Version 3 and 4 just look a tad too &amp;#8217;clip arty&amp;#8217;, for me. There is too much happening. Perspectives, outline type, very small type.)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dav&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 13:00:12 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Hubner</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280490 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I’m feeling #3 with the</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45740#comment-280487</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m feeling #3 with the stick of dynamite in the middle, but be careful, don&amp;#8217;t make your design too phallic either (not that it is, but it&amp;#8217;s easy enough to do)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 12:51:32 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>innovati</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 280487 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>logo critique</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45740</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi everyone.  Just looking for any opinions on these logos I&amp;#8217;ve recently come up with.  Good or bad, I&amp;#8217;d like to hear your thoughts.  Oh, the logo is for a possible TV production company.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;imageWrap&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/firecracka_ident_6183.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/45740#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/5">Design</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 12:36:33 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jazzhustler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">45740 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
