<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Magnolia - a modern italic - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45852</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Magnolia - a modern italic&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I’ve respaced, adjusted k,</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45852#comment-281631</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve respaced, adjusted k, t, q, tittles, and added an alternative g to substitute for the second one in &amp;#8220;gg&amp;#8221;. I&amp;#8217;m not sure if it&amp;#8217;s the right altervative, though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon,  2 Jun 2008 08:25:56 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mr</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281631 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>i like the contrast on the</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45852#comment-281289</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;i like the contrast on the tail of g, it&amp;#8217;s attractive (maybe too attractive for body text though?) The word &amp;#8217;higher&amp;#8217; looks lovely.&lt;br /&gt;
I might try making the t taller, k narrower on top arm (or waist more slanted), second arm of w starting a bit higher, and work on getting the shapes more even in colour and contrast.&lt;br /&gt;
there&amp;#8217;s a lot of potential here i think, really nice.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 13:41:55 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bendy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281289 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Chipman223:
I see what you</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45852#comment-281184</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Chipman223:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I see what you mean about the caps and lowercase. Maybe I&amp;#8217;ll separate the caps out and do something different with them. Whimsy was my intention, though, so I&amp;#8217;ll work on the lowercase for now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m going to work on spacing now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#8217;re right, the &amp;#8217;g&amp;#8217; and &amp;#8217;w&amp;#8217; do have weight issue. No, &amp;#8217;g&amp;#8217; is not ligated &amp;#8212; that might change.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your help.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alessandro: I&amp;#8217;m glad you like it. I&amp;#8217;m not entirely sure why I called it Magnolia. Perhaps I was aiming for the combination of lightness, neatness and prettiness that magnolias have.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:42:33 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mr</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281184 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hello Max, I like it very</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45852#comment-281018</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Max, I like it very much, I hope you can work it out.&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, the spacing is too tight now.&lt;br /&gt;
Why did you call it &amp;#8220;Magnolia&amp;#8221; ?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:54:14 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alessandro Segalini</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281018 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>To me, it almost seems as</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45852#comment-281011</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;To me, it almost seems as though the lowercase and uppercase are from two entirely different families. I really like the caps. They sort of have a feeling close to Filosofia Grand (albeit italic), looking classic and refined, while the lowwercase have this quirky, playful characteristic about them. I think the curved terminals and ball serifs are making the rest of the letterforms seem a little more whimsical, which is not necessarily a bad thing. The kerning on the lowercases seems a little tight in most cases too. Is the &amp;#8220;gg&amp;#8221; a ligature? It seems as though the overlap isn&amp;#8217;t quite right. The width of the bottom loop may require it to be ligated. The bottom of the bottom loop also looks a little dark to me, along with the first vertical stroke on the lowercase w. The tittles and punctuation seem a little heavy to me as well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:10:14 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chipman223</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281011 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Magnolia - a modern italic</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45852</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;d like to hear your comments on this typeface. I know it needs work, but I&amp;#8217;m not exactly sure which quirks are &amp;#8220;features&amp;#8221; and which are &amp;#8220;bugs&amp;#8221;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s opentype with a few ligatures (mostly ones needed to get this particular text looking OK) and a couple contextual alternates. It&amp;#8217;s my first attempt at OT.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/45852#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/27">Serif</category>
 <enclosure url="http://typophile.com/files/lathe.pdf" length="19032" type="application/pdf" />
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 04:38:28 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mr</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">45852 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
