<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Pakline logo critique - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45895</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Pakline logo critique&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>with Nick on this</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45895#comment-282255</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;with Nick on this one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&amp;#8212;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Paul Ducco&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.solid-creative.com/&quot;&gt;Graphic Design&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  4 Jun 2008 19:14:03 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ratbaggy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 282255 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>If your new designs can</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45895#comment-282164</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If your new designs can ditch the BV business, then I think you should go with 1/2/3/5 without the BV business:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;imageWrap&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/pakline_3432.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This element of your design is simple, and feels clean/sterile in a way appropriate to hospital products.  Everything else feels tacked on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8212;&lt;br /&gt;
Nick Hladek&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  4 Jun 2008 10:49:10 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>nvhladek</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 282164 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>(No subject)</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45895#comment-282086</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;imageWrap&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/Untitled-3_5844.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  4 Jun 2008 04:23:50 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kyrus</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 282086 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ok finally something came</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45895#comment-282081</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ok finally something came out my mind and I made this new one:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;imageWrap&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/Untitled-2_5716.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I got a problem now though, I really need to put the BV logo in it, but I&amp;#8217;ve tried several positions but none of it works. Any ideas?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  4 Jun 2008 03:45:09 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kyrus</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 282081 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I like the idea of having</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45895#comment-281919</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I like the idea of having the Pakline in a package.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  3 Jun 2008 11:03:15 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Dan Weaver</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281919 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hello and thank you for your</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45895#comment-281827</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hello and thank you for your comments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BV is a registered label that has to be attached to this logo, so I can&amp;#8217;t cut it out. I&amp;#8217;ve made some changes this morning, mostly towards the simplicity. Got two new examples to show and would appreciate further comments as always.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;imageWrap&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/logopakv2_4251.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  3 Jun 2008 04:14:29 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kyrus</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281827 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I personally like #10 both</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45895#comment-281810</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I personally like #10 both typographically and compositionally. But I think there is a stronger figure/ground relationship in #1 with the B and y. But that makes me question what that means exactly, like hola mentioned.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  3 Jun 2008 01:50:42 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ryan.bruner</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281810 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I like # 10. Has movement.</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45895#comment-281641</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I like # 10. Has movement. The rotated square would be better a couple of points up. Maybe the box all in green if you like that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon,  2 Jun 2008 09:29:58 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AGL</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281641 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>what is the “by” suppose</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45895#comment-281280</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;what is the &amp;#8220;by&amp;#8221; suppose to signify? I like #6 without the little &amp;#8220;by&amp;#8221; icon. I like the enclosure and interaction of Pakline and square and rectangle. If you made the solid green rectangle a tiny bit longer on the bottom you might a pretty nice &amp;#8220;P&amp;#8221; concept out of both open square and rectangle.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 13:02:50 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>hola</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281280 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>http://www.piac.com.pk
Just</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45895#comment-281242</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.piac.com.pk&quot; title=&quot;http://www.piac.com.pk&quot;&gt;http://www.piac.com.pk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Just Kidding with Flowers&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 08:57:54 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AzizMostafa</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281242 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pakline logo critique</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/45895</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hello.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First of all I&amp;#8217;m new here, so hello to everyone, great forum you have here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now back to the topic. I&amp;#8217;m designing a logotype for a company that produces and sells medical devices. We&amp;#8217;re gonna have a a new line now tho, and we&amp;#8217;re needing a logo for it. This line is called &amp;#8220;Pakline&amp;#8221; and it&amp;#8217;s purpose is to include several products into one pack (eg. Surgical procedure pack). The following are the logotypes we designed so far.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any critique would be appreciated, along with some ideas for new concepts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;imageWrap&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/logopak_4465.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;br /&gt;
Pedro Peixoto&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/45895#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/23">Logos / Corporate ID Design</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 08:37:39 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kyrus</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">45895 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
