<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Nike SPARQ font? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46033</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Nike SPARQ font?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>“Any credence to this</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46033#comment-284952</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;Any credence to this connection? Perhaps...&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I personally believe it&amp;#8217;s more in the line of &amp;#8220;Hm, spark sounds good. Active. Incentive. Yeah, name it so. Oh, and spell it with a Q: Sparq, [delete]so that it reads like Iraq[/delete], [insert]so that it catches the eye[/insert] and is conformist with new Web 2.0 naming conventions.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I doubt the Marketing guys of Nike thought of the Roman (farfetched, admittedly) connection. I mean, you were the first to get it. Is that something specific American, or is it not en vogue to have classical education any more in general, a world phenomenon?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Szabolcs&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:40:43 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>aszszelp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 284952 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SPQR = Senatus Populusque</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46033#comment-284926</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;SPQR = Senatus Populusque Romanus&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8220;The Senate and people of Rome.&amp;#8221;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I didn&amp;#8217;t make that association, although Szabolcs did.  Any credence to this connection?  Perhaps...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As concerns the font: in Miss Tiffany I trust.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#8212;&lt;br /&gt;
Nick Hladek&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:47:02 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>nvhladek</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 284926 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thanks Tiffany.
I found:</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46033#comment-283918</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Tiffany.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I found: B-52 and ITC MAchine and Base Runner JNL&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:46:57 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cariocastyle</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 283918 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>One suggestion: Verse. Note</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46033#comment-281999</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One suggestion: &lt;a href=&quot;http://rsrvs.com/index.php?act=viewProd&amp;amp;productId=37&quot;&gt;Verse&lt;/a&gt;. Note that it doesn&amp;#8217;t have a lowercase.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  3 Jun 2008 15:27:10 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Miss Tiffany</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281999 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Still don’t get it...</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46033#comment-281995</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Still don&amp;#8217;t get it... :)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#8220;So, what modern font would best express the classic (ancient) Roman ideal express most?&amp;#8221; : SPQR, Trajan ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway, any alternative to United anyone? Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  3 Jun 2008 15:07:47 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cariocastyle</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281995 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>caricastyle:
c’mon, be a</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46033#comment-281993</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;caricastyle:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;c&amp;#8217;mon, be a bitt more creative, more associative. At least the &amp;#8220;;-P&amp;#8221; should have inspired you! Use both sides of your brain!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SPARQ &amp;lt;=&amp;gt; SPQR &amp;#8212;- they have a very similar &amp;#8220;look&amp;#8221;. Nike = Greek godess of Victory (Latin Victoria), so merely looking at the thread title alone, I thought SPARQ might be a misspelling... So, what modern font would best express the classic (ancient) Roman ideal express most?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Szabolcs&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  3 Jun 2008 14:53:19 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>aszszelp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281993 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Not Trajan at all.
Szabolcs</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46033#comment-281991</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Not Trajan at all.&lt;br /&gt;
Szabolcs ??&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Miss Tiffany and Jazz is right, it&amp;#8217;s United. Quite expensive :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry next time I&amp;#8217;ll search.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyone has a cheap alternative to United ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks a lot.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  3 Jun 2008 14:47:51 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cariocastyle</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281991 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Search is your friend.</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46033#comment-281985</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.typophile.com/node/44353&quot;&gt;Search is your friend.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  3 Jun 2008 14:25:52 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Miss Tiffany</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281985 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It’s not a custom font.</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46033#comment-281984</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s not a custom font.  It&amp;#8217;s actually &amp;#8217;United&amp;#8217; by House industries - United San Reg Bold or Heavy to be exact, as there are quite a few weights with this font and the same again with serifs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.houseind.com/index.php?page=showfont&amp;amp;id=531&quot; title=&quot;http://www.houseind.com/index.php?page=showfont&amp;amp;id=531&quot;&gt;http://www.houseind.com/index.php?page=showfont&amp;amp;id=531&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;JH&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  3 Jun 2008 14:17:09 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jazzhustler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281984 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It is likely a custom font.</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46033#comment-281977</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is likely a custom font. Nike has been having them made for their ads for a while. Still, I could be wrong. You might want to look up plazm fonts and see if they did it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  3 Jun 2008 13:50:04 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eben Sorkin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281977 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why did I think it would be</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46033#comment-281976</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Why did I think it would be Trajan? ;-P&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Szabolcs&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue,  3 Jun 2008 13:47:47 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>aszszelp</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 281976 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nike SPARQ font?</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46033</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What font could look like this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.velocitysp.com/img/promotions/PromoBox-Nike-BeABetterAthlete.jpg&quot; title=&quot;http://www.velocitysp.com/img/promotions/PromoBox-Nike-BeABetterAthlete.jpg&quot;&gt;http://www.velocitysp.com/img/promotions/PromoBox-Nike-BeABetterAthlete....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not B-52 font. Thanks a lot !&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/46033#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/5">Design</category>
 <pubDate>Tue,  3 Jun 2008 13:38:04 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>cariocastyle</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">46033 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
