<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://typophile.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Typophile - Book typeface for technical paper - Comments</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46076</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Book typeface for technical paper&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Freight Text would be really</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46076#comment-282313</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Freight Text would be really good for that. Lots of weights, with the small caps in corresponding weights and styles. 20 fonts in the family. A good value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you can fix the naming conventions. See this &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a class=&quot;freelinking-external&quot; href=&quot;http://typophile.com/node/45930&quot;&gt;thread.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/Strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cycles Eleven is extraordinarily readable at small point sizes, but it lacks Bold italic.  And (or but) it is beautiful. The corresponding display font is Arepo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why do so many type designers insist on being so idiosyncratic?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu,  5 Jun 2008 05:59:28 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Renaissance Man</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 282313 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What about Univers to go</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46076#comment-282280</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;What about Univers to go with Utopia?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  4 Jun 2008 23:18:29 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>poms</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 282280 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I’d suggest Palatino, as</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46076#comment-282215</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;d suggest Palatino, as that is highly legible and has a nice, clean, modern, &amp;#8217;scientific&amp;#8217; look. Helvetica makes a good sans combo, but do check your font libs, &amp;#8217;cause there are alternatives.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Got any tips for budding gardeners? :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed,  4 Jun 2008 14:23:01 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Theunis de Jong</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 282215 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Book typeface for technical paper</title>
 <link>http://typophile.com/node/46076</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;looking for opinions on a typeface for a technical paper about fungus in sweetpotatoes. yes, that&amp;#8217;s correct.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;looking for something legible but not tricky or too beautiful. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thinking of Proforma or Utopia but would like to check out others.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;also, what would be a good sans serif companion for headings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;THANKS!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://typophile.com/node/46076#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://typophile.com/taxonomy/term/4">General Discussions</category>
 <pubDate>Wed,  4 Jun 2008 14:13:50 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mareese</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">46076 at http://typophile.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
