I allways like this kind of fonts. I can write you few of my observations:
- /e make the upper part tighter and the lower part wider.
- /s middle part should be the widest from the whole body
- /k and /K should be realted in line angles
- /o and /O is not good idea to make it a perfect circle (I can't see if you made them like that or not from this previews). In your case, they can be more wider at top and bottom, to make it opticaly stable.
- /S is falling to left
- /2, /3, /5, /? should have same stroke ends as C
- the angle of /4 is weird, try it like 7

Looking forward to see the changes. It is a fact, that in this area is really tough to make something new.
Jan

I think you will have to "push harder" with the /o. Here at /O comparision there are three /o - the black one is yours, the red one is Futura, the green one is Avantgarde and the blue circle is prefect circle. So you can see even the most geometrical fonts don't have /o as a perfect circle. The most geometrical one - Avantgarde has slightly more mass to the sides. Your /o is nearly perfect circle - it has 1px difference on 400px scale. So I would push bit more to at least 5-10px each side. But not by moving the side nodes more outside, only by moving the bottom and upper tangents more out.

/S I find nearly most difficult letter to design. It is so different from others. I think the bottom part is ok, so I would move the upper part more to the right. It's nearly at same vertical line with left bottom stroke , but at right side there is big space. On Futura /S you can see the upper part is somehow aligned to middle, while having small space on both sides.

Jan

New glyphs and texts! Reworked /S from scratch, already feels a lot better. Texts already feel pretty good, or on the right way at least.

I would really appreciate further critique.

Thanks
Jesse

I agree that I might have gone a bit too far with /O, /o and /Q; I am actually glad to go back to more rounded shapes. If you have seen the previous version of /S, I think you'd agree with me that this is a better approach, but I will alter the upper bow a bit. One can definitely tell that it leans backward when it's at the beginning of a word or standing on its own.

What does everybody think of /W and /4? Any idea for a more regular version of /Ü? And lastly, what about the conversion to a lighter weight?

Thank you so much
Jesse

I'm a bit late but :
the e still weird to me, probably because of his short tail (or spur or terminal, I don't know how to say it in english)
The W is really black in the middle, you just have to enlight it.
The middle stroke of the N is too black.
The S is too pinch in the top of the spine... You just have to open it a little, make it more "smooth"...
Nice font anyway with some great glyphs, and the font is already good, original and clean.

Best regards

Really cool, I unterstand for the e (it's better in the text than in the specimen anyway). The hyphen and the emdash seems to be really above the middle x line... (why not with all caps but with lowercase it's too much maybe) I love the braces, nice ampersand and at ! The S still pinchy but it's much better.
My blog is really old now, I did a lot of stuffs since then (a lot of fonts, much better). I'm working on a website on my own... If you're interested in, I send you some sample of new fonts.
Have a nice week !