New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
what follows is something I've done a few years ago
as a kind of warm-up exercise before a very different
job (which didn't turn out as expected BTW). I only
did then part of the lowercase set (the easier glyphs ;),
and five or six UC letters. Recently, I've come across
these files again and wondered if it would be worth the
trouble to revive and complete them.
What do you think?
There were three versions, which I'm calling hard,
soft and sharp. The hard version was the less
incomplete, so it's the only one I'm displaying here.
The soft version would naturally be the one more
appropriate for text (well, would it?). I compare
the three below.
The soft version is of course the most difficult and
demanding. I had a vision of how it should be, but
haven't been competent enough to do it back then
(or rather I didn't invest the necessary time on it).
But I guess sharp was the sexiest baby to me. ;)
General or specific comments are welcome.