Matt, I think the nature of low-res printers is such that any type you print often comes out a little heavier than it would be coming out of an imagesetter, though there are different versions of Times/Times New Roman out there.
Even before I posted I tried the Times New Roman on my machine which looked a bit heavier than the sample above. Maybe I have a poor version of that typeface. I'll check it again.
I wasn't printing... the final art will be for the web. The preview didn't look close... again it looked real heavy but I may have inadvertently had some text settings that changed the weight.
I'll have to check it out tonight on my home computer.
24 Mar 2003 — 9:07am
The TNR I have here (OpenType version that came with WinXP) is a perfect match.
24 Mar 2003 — 9:16am
Matt, I think the nature of low-res printers is such that any type you print often comes out a little heavier than it would be coming out of an imagesetter, though there are different versions of Times/Times New Roman out there.
24 Mar 2003 — 8:42am
Times (New Roman?) all caps
24 Mar 2003 — 8:59am
Thanks for the quick input! That looks good.
Even before I posted I tried the Times New Roman on my machine which looked a bit heavier than the sample above. Maybe I have a poor version of that typeface. I'll check it again.
24 Mar 2003 — 12:19pm
I wasn't printing... the final art will be for the web. The preview didn't look close... again it looked real heavy but I may have inadvertently had some text settings that changed the weight.
I'll have to check it out tonight on my home computer.
Thanks for all the input everyone.
24 Mar 2003 — 8:44am
Looks like Times New Roman.