Archive through March 28, 2003
Hmmm.
Well actually, my Enschede specimen is the 1908, and it shows no attribution for that font... but looking at the rest of the table I thought maybe by 1978 (the date of your specimen) they could safely conclude it was Sabon - the "petit romain grec" attributed to Sabon was sold in the same year to the same customer. BTW, the 1908 shows no other font at all with a "gamma-upsilon-nu" ligature (unless I missed it).
So I kinda guessed. What's my punishment?
hhp




27.Mar.2003 9.22pm
I'll need to check my source next time I'm in the office, but I'm pretty sure that this brevier Greek was cast from Granjon's original, not Sabon's version. It is the smallest size of Granjon's St Augustine Grec.
28.Mar.2003 6.30am
actually, my reference was on web:
http://www.graham.asher.btinternet.co.uk/grammatography/
http://www.graham.asher.btinternet.co.uk/grammatography/p56-greek-ligatures.jpg
the site says:
"A Manual of Reference to the Alphabets of Ancient and Modern Languages based on the German Compilation of F. Ballhorn.
London. Trübner and Co., 60, Paternoster Row. 1861."
the gamma+upsilon+nu ligature is not included, but the gamma+upsilon and upsilon+nu are.
28.Mar.2003 6.40am
New Question:
What were the original names for Helvetica and Univers?
And why they changed the names?
28.Mar.2003 8.02am
I think Helvetica was "Swiss". But it was taken.
Univers actually had a bunch of previous names, including "Galaxy" (no joke). But the main one cited as Frutiger's own choice is "Monde". But the font house (D&P) wanted something more international.
It's funny that people think of Univers as neutral. I think of it as Barbarella.
hhp
28.Mar.2003 9.04am
I think Hrant's right about Univers, but his Helvetica answer is apparently a guess. Helvetica's original name was Neue Haas Grotesk. I don't know why it was changed, though.
28.Mar.2003 9.16am
> apparently a guess.
The gall. I never do anything illegal. I always drive under the speed limit. When I'm parked.
--
Assuming Mark is right about Helvetica, if it were up to me it would be his turn now (or actually in an hour after Eduardo confirms).
hhp
28.Mar.2003 9.21am
Neue Haas Grotesk was changed to Helvetica in 1961 when it was released in Germany by D Stempel AG.
28.Mar.2003 10.36am
Hrant is right about Univers.
And Mark and Nathan are right about Helvetica,
but no one answered why it had its name changed.
28.Mar.2003 10.53am
I've always thought that Stempel named it Helvetica in...homage I suppose...to the Swiss and to Swiss design. At the time, perhaps still, the Swiss postage stamps said Helvetica (Latin for Switzerland). And, I believe that Hoffman at the HAAS foundry was actually surprised that Stempel named the font after Switzerland.
28.Mar.2003 10.54am
Because the Swiss threatened to invade?
hhp
28.Mar.2003 11.24am
hmm, interesting point-of-view, nathan, but
that's not correct, according to my reference.
the answer is related to language.
28.Mar.2003 11.41am
The Latin name for Switzerland was actually Helvetia. I believe Helvetica is Latin for Swiss.
28.Mar.2003 12.32pm
ok, hint: search for a essay Emily King wrote in 1996.
28.Mar.2003 12.48pm
Oh, great. Give it away. :-) Stempel renamed it in order to market it to non-German-speaking markets.
28.Mar.2003 1.04pm
congratulations, mark.
it's your turn.
the correct answers and my references:
Helvetica
"The success of the best known amongst them, Helvetica, has often
been credited to its name. Originally called Neue Haas-Grotesk by the
Haas Foundry of Munchenstein, the Stempel Foundry of Frankfurt
renamed the face in order to sell it to a non-German speaking market."
(Emily King)
Univers
"I liked the name Monde because of the simplicity of the sequence of
letters. The name Europe was also discussed; but Charles Peignot had
international sales plans for the typeface and had to consider the effect
of the name in other languages. Monde was unsuitable for German, in
which der Mond means "the moon". I suggested "Universal", whereupon
Peignot decided, in all modesty, that "Univers" was the most all-embracing
name!" (Frutiger's own words)
28.Mar.2003 1.23pm
This is a sort of similar question, and I hope it's not too easy...
As an imported foundry face, what did Akzidenz Grotesk used to be known as in the U.S.?
28.Mar.2003 1.31pm
Standard
28.Mar.2003 1.32pm
"Freeway Pile-Up"?
BTW, I think you just broke two Rules.
hhp
28.Mar.2003 1.49pm
Kent got it. Which two rules do you mean, Hrant?
28.Mar.2003 1.51pm
Oh, wait, was I supposed to wait before I posted the question?
28.Mar.2003 1.59pm
And that the question was too close to the previous one.
It just goes to show the inhuman depravity of your regime.
hhp
28.Mar.2003 2.39pm
Ha, ha. Very funny. Sorry if I broke the rules, but it really hurts my feelings to be compared to that idiot in the White House.
28.Mar.2003 3.00pm
Yes, in his excitement Mark broke two rules. This cannot go unpunished; this is a moment of truth; Laura, if I grow my hair will I look more 'Biblical'?
May I suggest, with apologies to Kent if his answer to the illegal question was correct, that Mark pose a new question, unrelated in theme to the previous one. Thank you
28.Mar.2003 3.35pm
So, is it okay for me to post a new question now?
28.Mar.2003 3.39pm
(That wasn't my question, by the way.)
28.Mar.2003 4.14pm
Yes. Proceed.
28.Mar.2003 5.31pm
Sorry for delay--dinner time here...
What did Herman Zapf design in the latter part of the eighties for the typesetting industry? What was its purpose?
28.Mar.2003 7.09pm
HZ, a set of algorithms for text justification, including word spacing, subtle letter stretching and optical margin alignment. Developed with Peter Karow of URW.
28.Mar.2003 7.22pm
Gee, that sounds better than the answer I'm looking for, but you're on the wrong track. This was something for the welfare of the typesetting industry in general. Hint: It wasn't a technique or invention.