I don't think this sample came from a digital font per se, but maybe a stamp or some type of handpress, with letters based on some of the typefaces David mentioned.
That might account for why some of the letters are a bit different, in shape and tone, as Stephen pointed out.
URW's version of Art Gothic contains several alternate characters that better match your sample Jared.
Precision Type has a version. Versions/clones from defunct foundries are out there as well.
Art Gothic appears in the Victorian section of the Solotype Catalog.
Stephen, I'm sure that you are correct, but I'm left wondering about a few things then:
1. Did metal type not contain alternate characters in a set? I know nothing about this, but noted that just the small sampling of Art Gothic in the Solotype Catalog contains two very different 'e's.
2. Could printing methods account for some of those variations, especially varying stroke weights?
3. When we see old type samplings (like Jared's apparently) that seem to mimic very old tyepfaces .... I don't know ... I guess this isn't a question. I'm just trying to picture what actually was being done. A lettering artist sitting and copying a printed sample next to him/her? With those handwritten variations we note
Don't forget film type, Mike. Metal isn't the only other printing method for type. I think most of the stuff in the Solotype Catalog is film type, because of the manipulations that were shown in the back of the book. Many of those tricks are done using film. Between the late '50's(?) and early '90's I think film type was used for a great deal of display and general typesetting, until digital type began to become widespread.
Thanks for the link Mike. I found precious little online using any of yours or David's pertinent terms in Google (even adding 'typography' to thin out false unwanted hits).
I did learn some, though. I gather that individual letters of a typeface still had to be physically placed in a machine
Hey, but now I understand what this all means, Jared! I recognize this sample! You're reopening the case of a slew of unresolved IDs in an effort to get them IDed eventually! Am I right?
For all these 13 ID's a very-near-miss is pretty much as good as a hit, if you have any candidates to suggest.
Posting old IDs? A good idea, but Yves, I think you might be delirious. Or much like the leopard, who, upon seeing all the gazelles run in different directions, is not sure which to attack first.
You guys are awesome! An inspiration to the rest of us.
Mike - A partial answer for you: before 1960 (or so) it was common to see display lettering done by hand, simply because in many instances it was cheaper and quicker to pay an artist to draw the letters than it was to procure metal or wood type to print them. How times have changed!
The glyphs I refer to when I see signs of hand-lettering are the UC 'C's and the lc 's's. But now I'm coming to the realization that these samples are just too poor to get an accurate reading on their method of printing. It's just as likely, as others have said, that this comes from a metal press with slight inconsistencies from ink and impression. The images are also poor scans, or photos, or whatever they are. It would help us all in this endeavor if we had more information about where the samples came from.
5.Sep.2003 3.51pm
now? to scan?
by the way, there's a tv show, "she wrote murder" or she....something. i don't know.....and the titles - with this typeface....
David Hamuel
5.Sep.2003 4.04pm
The "Murder She Wrote" font is here:
http://simplythebest.net/fonts/TVshow_fonts.html
it's called Lansbury.
I don't think this sample came from a digital font per se,
but maybe a stamp or some type of handpress, with
letters based on some of the typefaces David mentioned.
That might account for why some of the letters are a bit different,
in shape and tone, as Stephen pointed out.
bj
5.Sep.2003 4.06pm
and here's the image from the TV show.

5.Sep.2003 4.06pm
double
5.Sep.2003 4.07pm
It smells like an early 20th century British metal face.
(And font can have alternate letters, you know.)
hhp
5.Sep.2003 4.11pm
here
5.Sep.2003 4.17pm
Thanks bj. I started my day - 5am......so more samples......not now. pleaseeee
David Hamuel
5.Sep.2003 5.02pm
URW's version of Art Gothic contains several alternate characters that better match your sample Jared.
Precision Type has a version. Versions/clones from defunct foundries are out there as well.
Art Gothic appears in the Victorian section of the Solotype Catalog.
Stephen, I'm sure that you are correct, but I'm left wondering about a few things then:
5.Sep.2003 5.11pm
A few minutes distraction from composing my prior post and my questions have partially been answered in the interim.
Ya gotta be quick here.
5.Sep.2003 5.17pm
Metal type totally has alternate forms. In fact Gutenberg himself relied on alternate forms very heavily.
hhp
5.Sep.2003 5.32pm
Thank you for the info guys.
6.Sep.2003 9.34am
Don't forget film type, Mike. Metal isn't the only other printing method for type. I think most of the stuff in the Solotype Catalog is film type, because of the manipulations that were shown in the back of the book. Many of those tricks are done using film. Between the late '50's(?) and early '90's I think film type was used for a great deal of display and general typesetting, until digital type began to become widespread.
6.Sep.2003 1.55pm
Metal, dry transfer, computer
6.Sep.2003 2.11pm
Here is one link to a bit about Photolettering, another name for film type (as well as the name of a company that was one of the leaders in producing the typefaces): http://www.tpub.com/content/draftsman/14263/css/14263_273.htm
6.Sep.2003 2.31pm
online resources - no. but info, history etc., - yes.
call it Phototypesetting or Photocomposition (and erroneously - "cold type")
David Hamuel
6.Sep.2003 11.23pm
Thanks for the link Mike. I found precious little online using any of yours or David's pertinent terms in Google (even adding 'typography' to thin out false unwanted hits).
I did learn some, though. I gather that individual letters of a typeface still had to be physically placed in a machine
7.Sep.2003 7.29am
Mike said:"I did learn some, though. I gather that individual letters of a typeface still had to be physically placed in a machine
7.Sep.2003 8.05am
Aha. Thanks for that clarification Mike.
In the little info I found online, I clearly had made some false assumptions and linked bits of info incorrectly.
Your explanation of photolettering makes some of the comments in the Solotype Catalog, especially about tweaking jobs optically, make more sense now.
Again, I'm going to see what the library has to offer. Images of equipment and technique would be informative and fun for me to see.
7.Sep.2003 12.24pm
Mike,
look for:
* Herman Freud - Intertype Fotosetter, a first-generation phototypesetting system ( 1946).
* Louis Moyroud , Rene Higonnet - second-generation phototypesetting system (1949)
The basic idea/principle:
1. spinning disc + negative images of the typeface (to wit - letter is white. disc - black)
2. lens turret - for the type size.
3. prism - establishes type position (the letters can be condensed, extended etc. etc etc.)
4. paper or film
David Hamuel
7.Sep.2003 1.26pm
Thanks David.
I've written the titles down (decided to use the hand printing system).
5.Sep.2003 12.09pm
Hand-drawn.
5.Sep.2003 12.33pm
I'm not so sure, Stephen. It's not Greeting Monotone,
that's for sure.
5.Sep.2003 3.03pm
Hey, but now I understand what this all means, Jared!
I recognize this sample! You're reopening the case of
a slew of unresolved IDs in an effort to get them IDed
eventually! Am I right?
5.Sep.2003 3.22pm
Visual proof?
5.Sep.2003 3.28pm
I'm sure you can find a similar style in font form, but those
'C's and 's's are too different for me to believe this sample
was from a font.
5.Sep.2003 3.48pm
For all these 13 ID's a very-near-miss is pretty much as good as a hit, if you have any candidates to suggest.
Posting old IDs? A good idea, but Yves, I think you might be delirious. Or much like the leopard, who, upon seeing all the gazelles run in different directions, is not sure which to attack first.
You guys are awesome! An inspiration to the rest of us.
5.Sep.2003 4.18pm
David, this is elefanta? From Solotype?
5.Sep.2003 5.23pm
Mike - A partial answer for you: before 1960 (or so) it was
common to see display lettering done by hand, simply
because in many instances it was cheaper and quicker to
pay an artist to draw the letters than it was to procure
metal or wood type to print them. How times have changed!
The glyphs I refer to when I see signs of hand-lettering are
the UC 'C's and the lc 's's. But now I'm coming to the
realization that these samples are just too poor to get an
accurate reading on their method of printing. It's just as
likely, as others have said, that this comes from a metal
press with slight inconsistencies from ink and impression.
The images are also poor scans, or photos, or whatever
they are. It would help us all in this endeavor if we had
more information about where the samples came from.
5.Sep.2003 3.18pm
1. art gothic (solotype)
2. elefanta - type foundry - Karl Brendler & Sohne. old typeface- art nouveau
David Hamuel