New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
Create an account
Typophile RSS | More Feeds
Why are sans serif faces sometimes called 'gothic?'
Maybe it has something derrogatory to it? "Gothic" architecture wasn't called gothic in th Middle Ages, rather "The New Style" or "The French Style" or even sometimes "The International Style." During the Renaissance, it because known as gothic after it was surpased by the Italian classicist revival… the "goths" had destroyed the Roman Empire, i.e., all that was true and good in architecture for the Renaissance Italians. Therefore, medieval architecture was Gothic (barbarian), while their new style was "true to the roots," so to speak.
Sans Serifs first appeared in the 1800s. The Gothic style of architecture was undergoing an international revival during this time. Maybe type people of the day called those sans serifs "gothics" because they didn't like them (the German term for this style of sans serif is Grotesk, which seems to imply that people must have, at one point, found them "grotesque").
According to the New Oxford American Dictionary, gothic at one time meant "not classical," i.e., not Greek or Roman.
The term was/is used mainly by American type founders. Besides the German "grotesk" there is also the British "grotesque" and the French "antique" designations for the style.
For type there are seldom really nice clean answers. Especially when looking at type's history. The more you look the messier it is. That's one of the reasons why this board is so useful.
Gothic architecture has circular arches instead of pointed ones. Most of the first gothic fonts were constructions of circles and lines. I see a connection there.
I'm just glad there's still someplace in the world where people don't say "gothic" when they mean blackletter.
I thought it was the other way around. Gothic arches are pointed and Roman arches are rounded. At least that´s what they always teached me in art history classes.
And that´s why it is so confusing that sans serif typefaces sometimes are called gothic.
Hmm. I checked, and somehow I've had it backwards all this time. It might be that the typefaces are responsible for my misremembering.
Blackletter is related to Gothic architecture in style and date, Gothic is more reflective of the Industrial Revolution. However the compact OED gives this definition, see point 4, however point 3 could be more reflective of early sans serifs, I don't have access to the OED so I can't give the etymology.
• adjective 1 relating to the ancient Goths or their extinct language. 2 of the style of architecture prevalent in western Europe in the 12th-16th centuries, characterized by pointed arches and elaborate tracery. 3 portentously gloomy or horrifying. 4 (of lettering) derived from the angular style of handwriting with broad vertical downstrokes used in medieval western Europe.
Somethings in type are just arbitrary - there is no sense to be made of them. Accident of history. In many cases an ideosycratic personal history.
Everything I have read on this topic suggest that Dan's explanation above is accurate - btw.
Dan is closest to the mark, I think. The OED gives one definition of 'gothic' as:
4. Barbarous, rude, uncouth, unpolished, in bad taste.
citing as the earliest used in English literature:
1695. Dryden. 'All that has nothing of the Ancient gust is call'd a barbarous or Gothique manner.'
This usage was certainly well established -- and reinforced by the prejudices of neo-classicism -- by the time the first sans serif types appeared in the early 19th century. Later in that century, of course, there was a Gothic revival in art and architecture in Britain, which found its typographic expression in the works of the Kelmscott, Vale, etc. presses.
An interesting comment on this subject is offered by JamesMosley in his essay “The Nymph and the Grot: The revival of the sanserif letter” (London: Friends of the St. Bride Printing Library, 1999). That essay, first published in 1965 (Typographica, new series, no. 12, London: Lund Humphries, 1965, pp.2–19) was reissued in connection with the exhibition Primitive Types (29 January – 24 April 1999) organised by The Friends of The St. Bride Printing Library in association with Sir John Soane’s Museum. Sir John Soane’s revival of sans-serif (1816) most curiously coincides with the apparition of the well-known “Egyptian” type in the specimen book of William Caslon IV.
Did you just fix your link to St Bride (removing "url" from the end of the URL) or was it just my imagination?
The Goths DID sack Rome. And Gothics did trash Romans -- at least for a while...
While the Goths certainly sacked Rome, I wouldn't so far as to say that gothic type trashed Roman faces (or anything else, for that matter) ;-)
But Dan, look at the various best-seller lists...
Just because they sell better doesn't mean that they have trashed them.
The type bestseller lists reflect the fact that the majority of designers service the advertising industry, in which sans serif and display faces dominate, rather than book publishing. Of course, one could make a case that the triumph of advertising over literature represents a new kind of sack of civilisation.
The Goths, at least, having sacked Rome, settled down and became Romans. :)
Yeah, and look at some of the newer fonts -- Gothics that are growing serifs... (Thesis anyone?). La histoire se repête... ; )
Irony de jour is the font named both after a guy named after a small plot of land tended by little Franks, (not the wee wieners you get at cheap cocktail parties), and their ancient rivals, de Goths, with whom they fought almost continuously for all the centuries they coexisted in the west— you might better name a font Yankees Red Sox, Bush Bin Laden or Microsoft Europa ;) And, from my reading of history, the fact that the Goths never settled down to become good Romans is precisely why we know and have so little evidence of them, their name is associated with barbarism, compared to, Burgundians, Lombards and especially Franks, who did become Romananized, Holy even, and to this day Palatino and Franklin should not be used together.