To my semi-amateur eye:
m - the left half looks wider than the right one
t - the ascender seems too high
g - looks good but probably falls out from the general context
7 - falls to the left
Also I doubt about some width in the UC, for example, such wide G.
Speaking about the overall style, I like it pretty much.
The first thing I see: you have less space between the link of the g and the eye in the regular weight than the light. I think you need to open up the space on the regular to be have a consistent look.
15 Jun 2005 — 12:20pm
To my semi-amateur eye:
m - the left half looks wider than the right one
t - the ascender seems too high
g - looks good but probably falls out from the general context
7 - falls to the left
Also I doubt about some width in the UC, for example, such wide G.
Speaking about the overall style, I like it pretty much.
15 Jun 2005 — 4:29pm
The first thing I see: you have less space between the link of the g and the eye in the regular weight than the light. I think you need to open up the space on the regular to be have a consistent look.
16 Jun 2005 — 2:10am
As always, thanks for your comments.
I will post updates soon.
16 Sep 2005 — 5:13am
Only two things for now. The bottom of the number 4 would be better if it was longer. Same comment for the diagonale line of the R.
Excellent work
23 Sep 2005 — 11:38am
good work!