New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
what with Ministry Script
Posted by paul d hunt in
3 Aug 2005 — 9:57pm
3 Aug 2005 — 9:57pm
Okay, i chose Ministry Script for names for my sis's wedding invites. what should i set text in? Would Californian be OK? or something more along the lines of Bodoni? oh, and here's the card it'll be printed on (my sis picked it, it's a done deal). Any thoughts/suggestions are welcome.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Invite.pdf | 457.05 KB |
| Invite.gif | 32.51 KB |
| InviteRedux.gif | 42.31 KB |
User login
Support our Sponsors
3 Aug 2005 — 10:18pm
Bodoni?! It's a wedding, not a funeral.
Why not just use Ministry (a great match for those cards - which are nice btw) for everything? Everybody knows what a wedding invitation says anyway. As long as the numerals are unambiguous (for address & date/time) you should be fine. Just maybe lighten the names manually, since you'll probably be setting them larger, but you don't want them to scream - unless it's that kind of wedding I guess.
BTW, with all those kerning pairs I bet you're
seriously tempted to include a colophon eh? ;-)
hhp
3 Aug 2005 — 10:47pm
Don't go too old school. Cronos.
3 Aug 2005 — 10:49pm
No Cezanne Pro? Let's hope Jimmy G isn't reading this.
3 Aug 2005 — 10:50pm
i think you're right hrant. that's the conclusion i was coming to--all in ministry. i think i'll set it without frills (well you know what i mean!) except the names, which i'll fancy up a bit (hopefully not too much. i have a tendency to overdo that kinda thing.) so i'll pitch all ministry at my sis, but for some reason she wanted everything in a plain text font (but the names) so just for backup, still taking suggestions...
4 Aug 2005 — 1:53am
Paul, OT, but I can't find a link to your website anymore. You had a font that was unreleased. I wish I could remember the name but I can't. Are you planning on releasing this anytime in the near future. Thanks, Sharon
4 Aug 2005 — 5:57am
hey sharon, thanks for your interest. i haven't done much with any of those fonts for a while, but if you're interested in a particular one i might be able to finish it up for you. try to describe it in an email and we'll figure it out. if you click on the contact tab on my profile, you should be able to reach me that way.
4 Aug 2005 — 6:50am
hey Paul, I want to see the final design pleeeaseee! hehehe
Best,
Ale Paul
www.sudtipos.com
4 Aug 2005 — 9:47am
Paul, I might've suggested something like Parisine Clair Regular in small doses.
6 Aug 2005 — 4:01pm
hello, is this thing on? well i attached a PDF of what i've got so far, but i'm not sure anyone will be able to view it!!! (the attachment is attached to my first post) Anyhow, if you CAN view it, i did lighten the names a bit, but did i do enough? Did i go overboard with swashes? (i tend to do that) anyhow, hopefully i can get a crit on this somehow. I'm afraid i might have to post a jpeg or a gif for anyone to see... i might do that just now...
6 Aug 2005 — 6:11pm
I think too many typefaces on those cards would be certain death anyway, so Ministry Script is fine. I like the treatment, but I think I'd like the bride and groom's names just a wee bit smaller and / or lighter. They're kinda shouty right now, or at least the disparity in sizes between the small and large text makes it seem so.
6 Aug 2005 — 7:52pm
Paul, try to find different alts when you have descender and asceder colliding. Is there a way to combine them? I would have really like to see a separate typeface combined with this. Why? I think, in this instance, especially since the enlarged letters appear to be heavier weight, that a different typeface would allow the two names, in the script, to appear ... hmmm ... more hand drawn? I can't think of the word. Does this typeface have different weights?
7 Aug 2005 — 9:10am
okay, check out the redux version attached to the first post... i agree with norvell, those names were just too huge. hopefully they're better now. as stated before i did lighten the names up a bit, but do i need to go further? (this face doesn't have different weights). should the names match the rest of the text in weight? or is it ok for them to be slightly heavier? tiff, are there any spots in particular where the ascenders/descenders are a problem? any other feedback? thnx for what you've given so far!
7 Aug 2005 — 12:42pm
Much better, and I still think using the single face works well in context. With the tweaked sizes, I don't think it needs to be any lighter.
8 Aug 2005 — 6:06pm
Paul, with the changes you made -- sorry for not noticing you had changed the weights -- I think the main areas have been resolved. The descender g, in Egan, no longer bumps into the Ch, in Charles. As well, reducing the contrast in size helps with the visual divergence of the two point sizes. Could you make the names a little lighter?
9 Aug 2005 — 1:33pm
it's now outta my hands. thank for your help folks!
9 Aug 2005 — 1:35pm
How about a little more space in between the LD combo in LDS? And a little less space in between the ' (apostrophe) and the c in o'clock?
9 Aug 2005 — 1:35pm
Bottom line: The word spacing seems too loose after 1451