New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
Nameless
Posted by oribendor in
1 Sep 2005 — 7:20am
1 Sep 2005 — 7:20am
Well, what do you think?
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| sample.gif | 1.7 KB |
| extras.gif | 1.25 KB |
| two.gif | 5.1 KB |
| File | 3.79 KB |
User login
Support our Sponsors
1 Sep 2005 — 9:39am
Your -2- is wonderful. That ampersand is absolute narcissism ... and I love it! The -W- is falling backwards. So is the -s-. So is the -5-, but I think it is because you need to extend the bottom exit stroke by one pixel. The -A- seems a hair too tricky. The -f- seems too short.
Can you show us another setting of the entire set spaced out a bit more?
1 Sep 2005 — 10:45am
Miss Tiffany,
Please take a look at two.gif. You were absolutely right about the swashy 'W'; it's much better now. As for the 's', the alternatives aren't any better, are they? And is that what you had in mind for the '5'? Because I don't think it works. So doesn't the longer 'f'. Now, what do you mean by The -A- seems a hair too tricky? As for the spacing, it's either that loose or dense as it was before; I'm not sure which one is preferable. What do you say?
Many thanks,
Ori
1 Sep 2005 — 11:10am
Okay, it's now clear to me that the new spacing is better. Thanks again, Miss Tiffany!
1 Sep 2005 — 12:50pm
The fourth sample (drupal) shows: (a) better space between words; (b) better space between lines; (c) an alternative 's'.
5 Sep 2005 — 6:14am
what a beauty! I dig the ligatures.
And your new ‘s’ is way better.
5 Sep 2005 — 8:19am
Thanks, Gregory. As for the ligatures, they're actually useless, but designing them was fun. :)