fairly standard stuff

typotheticals's picture

attached is fairly standard stuff, but still interested in feedback.
The PDF is the latest one with current state as of 11th march

march11gem.pdf29.12 KB
jazzsammich's picture

Very very very nice! I'm not entirely sure about the crossbar on the t, as it looks like it clashes with the serif on the v next door. Perhaps f and g are similar. Which reminds me, where's the lowercase u?

But a gorgeous, highly legible font. I'm particularly fond of the jenson-y e and the tail on your a.

--Jim K.

Sebastian Nagel's picture

some things on first sight:

a: has a hangover to the left (top is a tad too long?)
d: bottom right slightly too short/small. is the same part of "a" bigger?
g: great :)
h, m, n: serifs too long? somehow they look strange
t: bar seems to be ok, i think it's a positioning problem between t/v
z: slightly too heavy? Stroke-weight too indifferent?

O: seems to be a bit goofy in the bottom part (moved slightly too much to the right side?)

But overall, this looks very promising.

typotheticals's picture

Bit of an update, but interested that you can not post another pdf /attachment after initial post.

*image removed* please see initial post for current pdf.

paul d hunt's picture

you can not post another pdf /attachment after initial post

edit your initial message and you can upload additional files there.

typotheticals's picture

Thanx, have added newer version to the initial post

typotheticals's picture

Latest version attached to original post named march11gem

Syndicate content Syndicate content