Very very very nice! I'm not entirely sure about the crossbar on the t, as it looks like it clashes with the serif on the v next door. Perhaps f and g are similar. Which reminds me, where's the lowercase u?
But a gorgeous, highly legible font. I'm particularly fond of the jenson-y e and the tail on your a.
a: has a hangover to the left (top is a tad too long?)
d: bottom right slightly too short/small. is the same part of "a" bigger?
g: great :)
h, m, n: serifs too long? somehow they look strange
t: bar seems to be ok, i think it's a positioning problem between t/v
z: slightly too heavy? Stroke-weight too indifferent?
O: seems to be a bit goofy in the bottom part (moved slightly too much to the right side?)
13 Feb 2006 — 5:58am
Very very very nice! I'm not entirely sure about the crossbar on the t, as it looks like it clashes with the serif on the v next door. Perhaps f and g are similar. Which reminds me, where's the lowercase u?
But a gorgeous, highly legible font. I'm particularly fond of the jenson-y e and the tail on your a.
--Jim K.
13 Feb 2006 — 6:23am
some things on first sight:
a: has a hangover to the left (top is a tad too long?)
d: bottom right slightly too short/small. is the same part of "a" bigger?
g: great :)
h, m, n: serifs too long? somehow they look strange
t: bar seems to be ok, i think it's a positioning problem between t/v
z: slightly too heavy? Stroke-weight too indifferent?
O: seems to be a bit goofy in the bottom part (moved slightly too much to the right side?)
But overall, this looks very promising.
21 Feb 2006 — 5:34am
Bit of an update, but interested that you can not post another pdf /attachment after initial post.
*image removed* please see initial post for current pdf.
21 Feb 2006 — 6:53am
you can not post another pdf /attachment after initial post
edit your initial message and you can upload additional files there.
25 Feb 2006 — 2:53am
Thanx, have added newer version to the initial post
10 Mar 2006 — 11:02pm
Latest version attached to original post named march11gem