Ragged type

Primary tabs

70 posts / 0 new
Last post
Jon Whipple's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Sep 2003 - 11:00am
0

darn an experiment gone awry…

John Butler's picture
Offline
Joined: 6 Nov 2001 - 11:00am
0

Interesting example, Bill… could you possibly build a version with newspaper-width columns? The narrower the column, the more noticeable the improvement would be, I would think.

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

Bill, interesting comparison.
Although I’m having trouble seeing any difference between #3 and #4.
BTW, how could MM scaling work now that Adobe has abandoned it?

Also, I’d be interested in how Indy’s advanced algorithms improve ragged setting.

hhp

Bill Lomax's picture
Offline
Joined: 10 Aug 2003 - 11:00am
0

Hrant,
It’s pretty subtle; I was trying to see how closely I could match the multi-line
composer’s version with MM scaling. There are differences. They’re more
apparent in the middle of the lines, because I took pains matching the ends.
Look at a

Gerald Giampa's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Aug 2003 - 2:09pm
0

I am busy now, but hanging punctuation is not without notice.

John Butler's picture
Offline
Joined: 6 Nov 2001 - 11:00am
0

Here is how our TeX-brethren do it. Here is what it can look like. See especially pp. 23-28.

Bill Lomax's picture
Offline
Joined: 10 Aug 2003 - 11:00am
0

Interesting John, wish I’d seen Hans presentation. That lecture was in 1999, does
PDFTeX now support hanging punctuation?

H

Bill Lomax's picture
Offline
Joined: 10 Aug 2003 - 11:00am
0

Here

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

I can’t seem to click on your PDF to download it.

hhp

Eduardo Omine's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 - 6:08am
0

Yeah, it’s unclickable here too.
Let’s wait and come back later.
I’ve seen this kind of thing before, and I just had
to wait and return. Then, I could download the
attachment normally.

Bill Lomax's picture
Offline
Joined: 10 Aug 2003 - 11:00am
0

I knew something was amiss last night, my browser hung every
time I tried to upload the message. Here

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

> Rag is controlled through hyphenation.

Which makes the rag on the left column nicer.
But hyphens suck.

Wasn’t Thomas saying that there’s a way to soften the rag without (or with less) hyphenation?

hhp

James Montalbano's picture
Joined: 18 Jun 2003 - 11:00am
0

I don’t agree that all hyphens suck, but the two instances of:

InDe-
sign

do.

Bill Lomax's picture
Offline
Joined: 10 Aug 2003 - 11:00am
0

I’ve not found that feature in my version Hrant, it may be one of the new “things” in InDesign CS.

Agreed James, it was late and I was hurrying. Not a good combination for fine work. :-) I think hyphenation works well why it’s used in moderation.

Some of you must have purchased the upgrade for InDesign CS, is there a more sophisticated setup for rag right now?

Thomas Phinney's picture
Offline
Joined: 3 Sep 2002 - 11:00am
0

Even in InDesign 2, the multi-line composer will try to make a relatively even rag in terms of evaluating line break options for all lines in each paragraph interactively.

*IF* you have hyphenation on, it will also use hyphenation and you can use the slider to choose your preferred balance between more even spacing (= more even rag with ragged right setting) vs. more hyphenation. So with ragged right setting, one might turn on hyphenation, but use the slider to make it an option of last resort by preferring a rougher rag over hyphenation.

T

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

That’s great stuff.

hhp

John Butler's picture
Offline
Joined: 6 Nov 2001 - 11:00am
0

Also see his thesis.

Tiffany Wardle's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Jul 2001 - 11:00am
0

But, Bill, if you do know how to bake the world’s best chocolate chip cookie, please do start a new thread with that recipe. =D

Joe Pemberton's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Apr 2002 - 3:36pm
0

[ This thread moved to Design ]