New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
I’ve been working on the text weight for this typeface. When I print it out, I’m happy with the way it looks at small sizes, but at a larger scale it seems to fall apart. Any tips for fixing this problem, or just critiques in general? Thx
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| hamburgefonstiv.gif | 3.1 KB |
16 Mar 2006 — 5:18pm
If you're working on a text weight shouldn't you be worrying more about how well it sets in it's intended size? I don't see text being set in anything close to the size you have the 'larger' version at in the GIF.
16 Mar 2006 — 5:21pm
Good point. As a novice type designer, I should probably be happy if I can get it to work at one size well.
16 Mar 2006 — 5:29pm
the "n" and "h" seem inconsistent. the "e" is nice but it feels out of place…
just my two cents…
16 Mar 2006 — 6:10pm
the bowls on the "a", "b" and "g" seem too wide compared to the "n" and the "o".
16 Mar 2006 — 6:10pm
I would suggest increasing the height of your e, and adding just the tiniest bit more contrast to the f, o, s, t, i, and v so that they're more consistent with the contrast in h, a, m, b, u, r, g, e, & n. I think it's less of a problem at the smaller sizes, but that it would help the color to be more even.
--Jim K.
edit: Perhaps o should be taller too.
2nd edit: Best. Username. Ever. ^_^
16 Mar 2006 — 6:27pm
I don't know what you mean by "falls apart", but I actually
believe that text fonts, at least the really good ones, are
supposed to look kinda dorky when set large.
So:
1) Decide what size you intend this to be used at.
2) Tell us.
3) Prodvide a PDF.
hhp
16 Mar 2006 — 8:17pm
The tail of the u looks just a little short to me. I second the e being out of place. And may I say you have very nice typeface right here. I realy like your "g".
16 Mar 2006 — 8:40pm
It looks like that your letter 'v' is irrelevant compared with others, maybe a little curve at the base would emphasize the roundness style and the width of 'h,' 'u,' 'n' should be equal. Hmm... maybe the spacing between each letter should be a little extended to enhance legibility at small point size. And I personally love your 'e'.
--- pinky kinky winky ---
17 Mar 2006 — 9:07pm
The h looks narrow but I like the rest of it. Hard to say anything more without a closer look.
18 Mar 2006 — 12:47pm
Thanks, I should be paying for this. All very helpful feedback, some of which I implemented.
19 Mar 2006 — 7:30pm
i like how it makes me feel a little out of place.
queer but perfectly done!
(;
19 Mar 2006 — 10:05pm
I think it looks pretty stong all around. The e doesn't seem to fit with the other letters and the h looks a little narrow as stated before. Great Job!
20 Mar 2006 — 11:33am
The e is probably bothering people because it seems like it's leaning slightly and it's drawn like an italic e. I think it's important that you keep the italic structure; you've done a really elegant job of pairing it with a geometric treatment and to me that's really the promising feature of these letters. Just tilting it slightly back into balance will (hopefully) resolve that issue...
20 Mar 2006 — 11:42am
The "s" looks out of sorts with the rest. It seems more closed than the rest and more condensed as well.
ChrisL
5 Apr 2006 — 12:41pm
Bitch, please!
5 Apr 2006 — 1:16pm
Well, OK...
(Now THAT would make a cool t-shirt.)
_
hhp
21 Apr 2006 — 1:06pm
You trying to flame me, you eLLeet hAxx0r? Bring it, matt.