Sorry for the delay. We’re ﬂooded over here. This post merely scratches the surface, more to come…
Haha! It keeps getting better… 15.001 is quite obscure. I love it.
How did I miss 15.006? Nice. I agree, Jason, 15.006 front and 15.006 back would both be better as two diﬀerent shirts. Many of the shirts would do better if they were greatly simpliﬁed. Just distilled down to one distinct concept. (This principle is not new, nor is it unique to shirts…)
002 has my vote. Nice graphic work.
> 15.001 is quite obscure. I love it. Is it “typophile” spelled with an HTF “ornaments” font? BTW, “the anonymous person”: I know who you are. Which makes me think: what if we had a contest to see who can identify the most designers (by looking at their designs)? hhp
I don’t recognize the ornaments. (It’s not Hoeﬂer Text Ornaments, anyway).
> 15.002, you could also try: ‘typedesign is not a crime’ Jacques
15.002 reminds me of a particular publisher of choral music in whose music you will ﬁnd a diﬀerent anti-photocopying message on each page. It used to provide my (very bored) choir with hours of enjoyment (we were young). Matthew
Hrant, name that tune!
I don’t get it. Am I supposed to try to guess who made that shirt? Or do you mean the Roy Preston one? Anyway, I think it’s bad to try to publicly (sp?) guess who made which shirt before the winner is declared. But since it could be so much fun maybe you should allow a short lag between choosing the winner and annoucing which one it is, so that in the interim we can try guessing. And the person who guesses the most gets a free shirt. Deal? hhp
the back of no. 6 would be the best in this lot as a front. too disconnected with the front anyway.