A width between Regular and Condensed?

Primary tabs

10 posts / 0 new
Last post
Dan Reynolds's picture
Offline
Joined: 20 Jul 2002 - 11:00am
A width between Regular and Condensed?
0

Is there a type width between Regular and Condensed?

If there would be such a width, would it be too much of a splitting hairs sort of thing for users to understand?

I've got a typeface in the works whose regular width is just too extended for my tastes. But for certain reasons, it has to be labeled the "regular" width. I have condensed weights too, which aren't really all that condensed, but are narrower than the regular.

Short of renaming my axis points (which isn't a possibility here), is there a proper name for a width that would lie between these two points?

Simon Daniels's picture
Offline
Joined: 11 Apr 2002 - 6:37pm
0

How about semi/demi condensed, compressed, squished or narrow?

Christian R. Szabo's picture
Joined: 14 Sep 2005 - 12:48am
0

Condegular.

J. Edward Sanchez's picture
Joined: 10 Sep 2004 - 2:47pm
0

Evaporated.

Simon Daniels's picture
Offline
Joined: 11 Apr 2002 - 6:37pm
0

Maybe a system could be based on opera performers - waif through to fat lady?

Patricia Fabricant's picture
Joined: 23 Mar 2004 - 9:40am
0

I'd call it narrow.

There is such a range of "condensed" fonts from those that barely look condensed at all to the ultra skinny.

Thomas Phinney's picture
Offline
Joined: 3 Sep 2002 - 11:00am
0

In several families, Adobe has called it "semicondensed."

T

Dan Reynolds's picture
Offline
Joined: 20 Jul 2002 - 11:00am
0

Si: compressed, squished or narrow?

A lot of bigger font families already use compressed and narrow variants, which are all less wide than the condensed, if I remember correctly. So calling the intermediary weight one of these would only add to the increasingly confusing landscape of font naming.

Thomas: In several families, Adobe has called it “semicondensed.”

Thank you! I should have remembered that some Adobe fonts had this. I'm glad that there is a specific naming precendent.

Karsten Luecke's picture
Offline
Joined: 6 Aug 2005 - 8:41am
0

In the specs for the OS/2-table, usWidthClass mentions this:

1  Ultra-condensed  (50% of normal)
2  Extra-condensed  (62.5% of normal)
3  Condensed  (75% of normal)
4  Semi-condensed  (87.5% of normal)
5  Medium (normal)  (100%)
6  Semi-expanded  (112.5% of normal)
7  Expanded  (125% of normal)
8  Extra-expanded  (150% of normal)
9  Ultra-expanded  (200% of normal)
The addition of % sounds a bit like over-regulation ... (CSS2 font specs mention the same table without the %-values.)

Even when choosing different names, I find it helpful to see that it employs the same scheme as for weights, with 'ultra', 'extra', 'semi'.

Terry Biddle's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 May 2005 - 1:42pm
0

I would use this system:

Regular
Plus-Size model
Supermodel