clifford ff

Primary tabs

3 posts / 0 new
Last post
john landaw's picture
Offline
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 - 8:41am
clifford ff
0

Anyone any views on this face? Much praised.

It comes in 6,9,16

I presume that, for general text work around the 10-11pt size, the 9 would be the one to go for?

John S's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Sep 2006 - 3:12am
0

Clifford *would* be fabulous if it were complete! I can't use any text family that lacks bold and bold italic, except for display of course. And don't tell me book designs don't require bold someplace--they do! Why can't these designers finish the job?? Requiem the same thing, although I've been told by staffers at H-FJ for years now that bold and bold italic are in the works.

Stephen Coles's picture
Offline
Joined: 14 May 2001 - 11:00am
0

Yes. The names are reminiscent of metal type sizes, but you don't have to take them literally. So Clifford 9 will work beautifully for text. Here's more on FF Clifford.