A Signage encoding initiative?
I wonder if we don’t have Unicode-points for symbols, such as most frequently occuring PUBLIC ORIENTATION SIGNS. Last year I forwarded an initial proposal to get some 80 signs in the UCS, yet this takes ages to get along – to what end, nobody knows. (The proposal is downloadable at http://www.signographie.de/cms/standard.htm .) – – I think that public signage becomes a kind of “world script” steadily and therefore should be encoded. Both font producers and users alike would benefit from this. The usage of standard-based symbol fonts would be more stable, safer and faster. – – However, as long as the official encoding seems hardly to be achieved I should suggest a workaround: let’s capture the PRIVAT USE AREA and collaborate towards an agreement upon which codepoint should host which sign. A kind of semi-standard might arise by this, if we than offer fonts on grounds of a synchronized encoding. – – Who is working on symbols/fonts and may be willing to contribute to an INITIATIVE to encode public orientation signs? – – suggestions welcome, contributions most welcome! A:S
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Publix.jpg | 159.1 KB |
12.Mar.2007 9.26am
Sorry, but none of the serious players (MS, Adobe, Apple, IBM, Linux, John Hudson etc.,) are going to come within ten miles of a PUA “land-grab” like this, especially considering the grief they’ve been given for their PUA actions in the past. I think efforts would be better directed to a universal symbol description language that might use glyph names or a new OpenType table to define the design of each symbol, then the actual symbols could live anywhere in the PUA.
12.Mar.2007 10.48am
I’m afraid Si’s right about this one.
I like the idea of an OT table to manage the design. This would allow each design to be composed of a single glyph, or multiple glyphs, and allow for re-use of componeents. That would allow fonts to be desinged for printing small, for printing large, for vinyl sign machines, etc, where the ideal solutions might vary.