Well there are good and bad reasons to make an x-height obese. In the 70s for example many people did it purely for style, in disregard for anything else (think ITC Garamond). That sucked. On the other hand the smaller the point size the larger the x-height should be - and newspapers are a very prominent and long-standing case of small-size typography needing large x-heights.
Greta’s x-height I would actually not call “obese” btw - I think if you measure it it’ll come out to about what Times is. Also, width has a compounding effect; Times is narrow while ITC Garamond is wide, making the latter than much worse.
In the case of Greta, you’re comparing the x-height to the height of the lowercase ascenders and not the caps, right? ’Cuz if you look at the words “Greta Text” at the top of the sample you linked, the cap-to-x-height relationship looks positively Vectora-like.
Yes, caps constituting only about 5% of text aren’t very relevant here. But Greta’s sure are super short! Some kind of record*, or close. I personally like that, although it does have one drawback: for text that’s likely to be scanned (as a rule for a proper name, hence something capitalized) it’s less effective than caps that stand out a bit. And it seems to me that the types of settings that benefit from fonts with large x-heights also tend to benefit from being easily scanned.
* Vectora’s caps are even smaller, but look at the x-height compared to the ascenders: gargantuan. I’d say this makes the caps relatively larger than Greta’s.
hhp
Who's Online:
There are currently 31 users and 108 guests online.
User login
New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
23.Apr.2007 3.19am
Not for sale sadly:
http://www.christianschwartz.com/guardian.shtml
23.Apr.2007 3.21am
is there anything similar out there?
23.Apr.2007 3.29am
Oranda is probably closest:
http://www.paratype.com/btstore/default.asp?fcode=210&search=Oranda
23.Apr.2007 3.45am
any other suugestions as a poor replacement?
23.Apr.2007 4.07am
Poor as in quality or price?
There’s Apex Serif.
23.Apr.2007 4.23am
Olsen has similar qualities: robust, big xheight.
http://www.fontshop.com/search/?q=olsen&site=d
23.Apr.2007 7.05am
“any other suugestions as a poor replacement?”
I’m poor, so I use ATF Antique...
http://www.fontsite.com/Pages/FFDownloads.html
(Apologies to the free font opponents.)
24.Apr.2007 10.01am
Another option is ITC Charter which is seeing a lot of action lately.
24.Apr.2007 10.04am
Or: http://www.tdc.org/news/2007Results/GretaText.html
hhp
——
Today, learn about the Armenian Genocide.
27.Apr.2007 2.40pm
Nobody here opposes free fonts, only the rip-offs. ;^)
27.Apr.2007 3.36pm
Hrant, what do you think of Greta? It seems to have the “obese x-height” you often rail against.
27.Apr.2007 4.51pm
Well there are good and bad reasons to make an x-height obese. In the 70s for example many people did it purely for style, in disregard for anything else (think ITC Garamond). That sucked. On the other hand the smaller the point size the larger the x-height should be - and newspapers are a very prominent and long-standing case of small-size typography needing large x-heights.
Greta’s x-height I would actually not call “obese” btw - I think if you measure it it’ll come out to about what Times is. Also, width has a compounding effect; Times is narrow while ITC Garamond is wide, making the latter than much worse.
hhp
27.Apr.2007 5.44pm
Thanks for clarifying, Hrant.
In the case of Greta, you’re comparing the x-height to the height of the lowercase ascenders and not the caps, right? ’Cuz if you look at the words “Greta Text” at the top of the sample you linked, the cap-to-x-height relationship looks positively Vectora-like.
27.Apr.2007 6.04pm
Yeah, I guess rather than call out Greta’s x-height, you could deem its cap height diminutive.
27.Apr.2007 6.31pm
Yes, caps constituting only about 5% of text aren’t very relevant here. But Greta’s sure are super short! Some kind of record*, or close. I personally like that, although it does have one drawback: for text that’s likely to be scanned (as a rule for a proper name, hence something capitalized) it’s less effective than caps that stand out a bit. And it seems to me that the types of settings that benefit from fonts with large x-heights also tend to benefit from being easily scanned.
* Vectora’s caps are even smaller, but look at the x-height compared to the ascenders: gargantuan. I’d say this makes the caps relatively larger than Greta’s.
hhp