Stop Making Type
Anyone read the article in this month’s Print about the efforts of the American Typographers Association to control type production? Was interesting and comical.
Anyone read the article in this month’s Print about the efforts of the American Typographers Association to control type production? Was interesting and comical.
25.Aug.2007 7.04am
Any way to read it on the internet or to get any scans of the page?
25.Aug.2007 8.25am
Stop making music! Stop writing books!
25.Aug.2007 8.32am
So this was a history piece? Or have these guys been raised from the grave?
Cheers, Si
25.Aug.2007 9.23am
Who is the American Typographers Association? Google and Wikipedia don’t seem to have heard about it.
25.Aug.2007 9.37am
According to Live Search
http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=%22American+Typographers+Associati...
they published the “Type Talks” publication in 1945. I assume you may need to consult with real books, and not the web for more info :-(
Seem to be later issues of “Type Talks” available through Amazon, these list “Advertising Typographers” as the publisher. Perhaps the ATA became the AT?
25.Aug.2007 10.05am
> the efforts of the American Typographers Association to control type production
with birth control pill... or type control pill?
25.Aug.2007 10.26am
Are you sure that wasn’t a reprint? They’ve been reprinting older articles. ;^}
25.Aug.2007 10.31am
This was a historical piece. These guys got together and tried to set some guidelines for good type. I get the sense they were trying to protect both American foundries from European competition and to help job shops that were constantly having to buy faces that would only be used for a job or two and then sit mouldering and thus not making money. I guess part of the problem was the ad agencies would spec some awful face for a project, the job shop would have to buy it — all metal at the time - not a $60 download from myfonts.com.
Anyway, the funny thing to me was how did they expect to enforce their rulings? Free economy, supply and demand and all that. If an agency wanted some really bad egyptian how did this group think they could stop that?
Not earthshaking, but an interesting read.
—
Mike
25.Aug.2007 10.32am
Tiffany, aren’t you thinking of rePrint? ;-)
25.Aug.2007 10.35am
Sounds like an interesting article.
>Anyway, the funny thing to me was how did they expect to enforce their rulings?
The traditional way to do this would be to form a cartel of manufacturers.
25.Aug.2007 10.35am
You know, Rolling Stone has been doing the reprint thing, too. Seems everyone is getting all nostalgic ... or they have run out of good content!
I just checked and the article is not identified as a reprint.
I should point out the article is not advocating anything, it is just a piece on this group that met back in the late 1920’s to try to control some aspects of type production.
—
Mike
25.Aug.2007 11.45am
Like all professional bodies, self-interest mixed with idealism.
Another typesetters’ organization, the Typographers International Association, issued a press release in 1986 challenging Apple to set their print ads on a LaserWriter. They were trying to protect the threat to their industry (imagine you had just invested tens of thousands in equipment soon to be obsolete: tragic), but they were also representing a quality cultural product from a trade with centuries of experience, against the then crappy quality of “Desktop Publishing”.
25.Aug.2007 1.36pm
Thanks Mike. That was sort of like hearing “War of The Worlds” on the radio without knowing it was a dramatization.
ChrisL
25.Aug.2007 1.46pm
I recall an issue of “Creative Computing” from the early 1980s that had pages side-by-side, one set by phototypesetting as was the style in the day, the other done on a 300 DPI laser printer. And while one could still see the jaggies of the text, and the reduced inset page images became solid lines, the laser page did look quite a bit cleaner. I wish I had that issue on hand right now, but surely it has rotted into dust.
25.Aug.2007 1.51pm
> the efforts of the American Typographers Association.... in the late 1920’s to try to control some aspects of type production.
ah context. why you didn’t say that :^)
25.Aug.2007 1.58pm
imagine you had just invested tens of thousands in equipment soon to be obsolete: tragic
Hundreds of thousands.
25.Aug.2007 1.59pm
That was sort of like hearing “War of The Worlds” on the radio without knowing it was a dramatization.
I for one welcome our new typographic overlords.
25.Aug.2007 2.57pm
ATA= Advertising Typographers Association of America
25.Aug.2007 3.15pm
“I for one welcome our new typographic overlords.”
Yes, John, didn’t it all start in 1984 anyway? :-)
ChrisL
25.Aug.2007 3.28pm
Google and Wikipedia don’t seem to have heard about it.
In that case it doesn’t exist. ;-)
26.Aug.2007 5.00am
“Stop making music! Stop writing books!
What?
You need more than five???
27.Aug.2007 7.02am
> What? You need more than five [books]???
There are some people who feel that more than one is too many (if the one is the Bible).
That dratted Harry Potter stuff is the Devil’s work.
27.Aug.2007 8.35am
See the film “Fahrenheit 451”
ChrisL
27.Aug.2007 8.38am
typefaces, (ala Masimo Vignelli)
of course that could as easily apply to, books, songs, kinds of beer and so on :-)
27.Aug.2007 9.17am
dezcom: See the film “Fahrenheit 451”
Or, read the book.
27.Aug.2007 11.15am
But it was burned in the film! :-)
ChrisL
28.Aug.2007 7.34am
we need to be wary of any organisation that desires control
28.Aug.2007 1.33pm
I think its already to late.
Oded Ezer has managed to create a typosperma
http://odedezer.com/typosperma.html
Birth control is our only chance!
30.Aug.2007 10.00am
This was a historical piece.
Are you sure that wasn’t a reprint?
I just got this issue of Print, and the article is by Paul Shaw.