Archive through June 05, 2003

kentlew
30.May.2003 5.11am
kentlew's picture

Yves, you let the cat out of the bag. You were sooo close. But John Hudson nailed it positively. It is indeed Trump Medi



jfp
30.May.2003 6.10am
jfp's picture

Kent, I think, without Yves, John will never found it, no? I propose that booth, in conjonction, will propose a new quiz?


Bald Condensed
30.May.2003 6.27am
Bald Condensed's picture

Maybe, maybe not, Jean-Fran


John Hudson
30.May.2003 10.12am
John Hudson's picture

I really would not have got it without Yves' mention of Trump. Compared to most of the present company, I'm very bad at identifying typefaces. However, since Yves has been so gracious (except for the bit where he called me an American!), I'll post a challenge very shortly.


John Hudson
30.May.2003 10.25am
John Hudson's picture

Okay, here it is. I was really tempted to post something non-Latin: a small corner of a Chinese character, the feather of an Armenian bird letter, or the reph form of an Hindi vocalic R, but I settled on something a little less obscure:

Type ID popquiz first

Looks like a Latin lowercase e to me, but appearences can be misleading.


Eduardo Omine
30.May.2003 11.51am
Eduardo Omine's picture

Wow, John, is this "less obscure"? ;-)
Anyway, I'm assuming this is not Latin, right?


Bald Condensed
30.May.2003 12.19pm
Bald Condensed's picture

(except for the bit where he called me an American!)

John, I know this is a sensitive topic, but technically,
you are, just as I'm a European. I'm a Belgian and you're
a Canadian, but I was referring to the whole continent
in regards of time zones. ;)

(Whew, did I talk me out of this one!)


Bald Condensed
30.May.2003 12.28pm
Bald Condensed's picture

ITC Stone Serif


John Hudson
30.May.2003 12.46pm
John Hudson's picture

No, not ITC Stone Serif.

Eduardo, it may or may not be Latin. It may in fact be a lowercase Latin e. But that in itself might be misleading. :-)


Eduardo Omine
30.May.2003 1.56pm
Eduardo Omine's picture

Hmm... So it's a character that looks like a
Latin e but it's actually a character from
another language/script...
Well, I have no idea. :-)


jfp
30.May.2003 3.18pm
jfp's picture

Yves, I have seen also a Stone, but quickly, I noticed that Stone don't have a diagonal cut like that.

John, what is the proportion of this part of a glyph? xheight? cap? its a Latin "based" script (such Greek, Cyrillic and others are in some way?)


cheshiredave
30.May.2003 3.57pm
cheshiredave's picture

So it may be an ae or oe ligature?


John Hudson
30.May.2003 5.27pm
John Hudson's picture

what is the proportion of this part of a glyph? xheight?

x-height

its a Latin "based" script (such Greek, Cyrillic and others are in some way?)

Sheesh, you want me to tell you everything?

It's European script in modern use (which effectively means that it is Greek-based).


matteson
2.Jun.2003 2.30pm
matteson's picture

Here's a shot in the dark: a lower case abkhasian che from Gentium.


John Hudson
2.Jun.2003 2.58pm
John Hudson's picture

Wow, wild shot, but it's really nothing that obscure. Since so few people seem to be making a stab at this, let me provide some clues:

This is, in fact, exactly the same glyph as the Latin lowercase e character in a Latin typeface, but you would likely be misled if you set off looking for a Latin typeface.

This typeface is available online.


John Hudson
4.Jun.2003 11.29am
John Hudson's picture

Well, this is a very poor showing. And you call yourselves type ID experts? Sad. :-)

Okay, here's a bit more of the type, and another clue: this typeface was originally designed for typesetting the Bible.

Type ID pop quiz second


Eduardo Omine
4.Jun.2003 12.44pm
Eduardo Omine's picture

Is it from a Dutch designer?


jfp
4.Jun.2003 1.27pm
jfp's picture

too bad to be Dutch! I'm sure I know it now, but I really have no idea, grr. The only "started as Bible font" I know is Weidmann, but its not that one.

Europe or America designer?

before 1990 or after?


beejay
4.Jun.2003 1.39pm
beejay's picture

John - On the DTL site, can't see the detail
on DTL Romulus and no pdf is available.

Is this a digitization from Van Krimpen's work?


Eduardo Omine
4.Jun.2003 1.46pm
Eduardo Omine's picture

No, I don't think it's DTL Romulus.


John Hudson
4.Jun.2003 3.00pm
John Hudson's picture

Not Romulus. Not Dutch.

(To be fair, Jean-Fran


jfp
4.Jun.2003 3.49pm
jfp's picture

>(To be fair, Jean-Fran


kentlew
5.Jun.2003 4.52am
kentlew's picture

It's a little tough for me to tell from the samples at my disposal, but I'm thinking this is Octava by Vladimir Yefimov.

-- K.


matteson
5.Jun.2003 8.49am
matteson's picture

That's gotta be it...


jfp
5.Jun.2003 9.04am
jfp's picture

Octava book! by Yefimov, 1997, paratype. Yes! well spotted. A good typeface.


John Hudson
5.Jun.2003 9.55am
John Hudson's picture

Bravo Kent! It is indeed Octava, originally commissioned by the Russian Bible Society.


kentlew
5.Jun.2003 10.37am
kentlew's picture

From your clues, John, I thought Cyrillic right away. Then I remembered the Kyrillitsa 99 catalog -- bingo! Octava.

Here's the next challenge.

Type Quiz 6/5/03


typografski
5.Jun.2003 12.52pm
typografski's picture

The Antiqua Black by Luc(as) de Groot?


kentlew
5.Jun.2003 1.41pm
kentlew's picture

Heinrich --

Man, you always seem to nail my IDs right out of the gate. Just one detail -- Tell me *which variant* of The Antiqua and the prize is yours.

-- K.


Fabio Augusto
5.Jun.2003 2.32pm
Fabio Augusto's picture

This is like Interpol Serif (from Kombin.at) and Silica by Summer Stone!