I really would not have got it without Yves' mention of Trump. Compared to most of the present company, I'm very bad at identifying typefaces. However, since Yves has been so gracious (except for the bit where he called me an American!), I'll post a challenge very shortly.
Okay, here it is. I was really tempted to post something non-Latin: a small corner of a Chinese character, the feather of an Armenian bird letter, or the reph form of an Hindi vocalic R, but I settled on something a little less obscure:
Looks like a Latin lowercase e to me, but appearences can be misleading.
(except for the bit where he called me an American!)
John, I know this is a sensitive topic, but technically, you are, just as I'm a European. I'm a Belgian and you're a Canadian, but I was referring to the whole continent in regards of time zones. ;)
Wow, wild shot, but it's really nothing that obscure. Since so few people seem to be making a stab at this, let me provide some clues:
This is, in fact, exactly the same glyph as the Latin lowercase e character in a Latin typeface, but you would likely be misled if you set off looking for a Latin typeface.
too bad to be Dutch! I'm sure I know it now, but I really have no idea, grr. The only "started as Bible font" I know is Weidmann, but its not that one.
30.May.2003 6.10am
Kent, I think, without Yves, John will never found it, no? I propose that booth, in conjonction, will propose a new quiz?
30.May.2003 6.27am
Maybe, maybe not, Jean-Fran
30.May.2003 10.12am
I really would not have got it without Yves' mention of Trump. Compared to most of the present company, I'm very bad at identifying typefaces. However, since Yves has been so gracious (except for the bit where he called me an American!), I'll post a challenge very shortly.
30.May.2003 10.25am
Okay, here it is. I was really tempted to post something non-Latin: a small corner of a Chinese character, the feather of an Armenian bird letter, or the reph form of an Hindi vocalic R, but I settled on something a little less obscure:
Looks like a Latin lowercase e to me, but appearences can be misleading.
30.May.2003 11.51am
Wow, John, is this "less obscure"? ;-)
Anyway, I'm assuming this is not Latin, right?
30.May.2003 12.19pm
(except for the bit where he called me an American!)
John, I know this is a sensitive topic, but technically,
you are, just as I'm a European. I'm a Belgian and you're
a Canadian, but I was referring to the whole continent
in regards of time zones. ;)
(Whew, did I talk me out of this one!)
30.May.2003 12.28pm
ITC Stone Serif
30.May.2003 12.46pm
No, not ITC Stone Serif.

Eduardo, it may or may not be Latin. It may in fact be a lowercase Latin e. But that in itself might be misleading.
30.May.2003 1.56pm
Hmm... So it's a character that looks like a
Latin e but it's actually a character from
another language/script...
Well, I have no idea. :-)
30.May.2003 3.18pm
Yves, I have seen also a Stone, but quickly, I noticed that Stone don't have a diagonal cut like that.
John, what is the proportion of this part of a glyph? xheight? cap? its a Latin "based" script (such Greek, Cyrillic and others are in some way?)
30.May.2003 3.57pm
So it may be an ae or oe ligature?
30.May.2003 5.27pm
what is the proportion of this part of a glyph? xheight?
x-height
its a Latin "based" script (such Greek, Cyrillic and others are in some way?)
Sheesh, you want me to tell you everything?
It's European script in modern use (which effectively means that it is Greek-based).
2.Jun.2003 2.30pm
Here's a shot in the dark: a lower case abkhasian che from Gentium.
2.Jun.2003 2.58pm
Wow, wild shot, but it's really nothing that obscure. Since so few people seem to be making a stab at this, let me provide some clues:
This is, in fact, exactly the same glyph as the Latin lowercase e character in a Latin typeface, but you would likely be misled if you set off looking for a Latin typeface.
This typeface is available online.
4.Jun.2003 11.29am
Well, this is a very poor showing. And you call yourselves type ID experts? Sad.

Okay, here's a bit more of the type, and another clue: this typeface was originally designed for typesetting the Bible.
4.Jun.2003 12.44pm
Is it from a Dutch designer?
4.Jun.2003 1.27pm
too bad to be Dutch! I'm sure I know it now, but I really have no idea, grr. The only "started as Bible font" I know is Weidmann, but its not that one.
Europe or America designer?
before 1990 or after?
4.Jun.2003 1.39pm
John - On the DTL site, can't see the detail
on DTL Romulus and no pdf is available.
Is this a digitization from Van Krimpen's work?
4.Jun.2003 1.46pm
No, I don't think it's DTL Romulus.
4.Jun.2003 3.00pm
Not Romulus. Not Dutch.
(To be fair, Jean-Fran
4.Jun.2003 3.49pm
>(To be fair, Jean-Fran
5.Jun.2003 4.52am
It's a little tough for me to tell from the samples at my disposal, but I'm thinking this is Octava by Vladimir Yefimov.
-- K.
5.Jun.2003 8.49am
That's gotta be it...
5.Jun.2003 9.04am
Octava book! by Yefimov, 1997, paratype. Yes! well spotted. A good typeface.
5.Jun.2003 9.55am
Bravo Kent! It is indeed Octava, originally commissioned by the Russian Bible Society.
5.Jun.2003 10.37am
From your clues, John, I thought Cyrillic right away. Then I remembered the Kyrillitsa 99 catalog -- bingo! Octava.
Here's the next challenge.
5.Jun.2003 12.52pm
The Antiqua Black by Luc(as) de Groot?
5.Jun.2003 1.41pm
Heinrich --
Man, you always seem to nail my IDs right out of the gate. Just one detail -- Tell me *which variant* of The Antiqua and the prize is yours.
-- K.
5.Jun.2003 2.32pm
This is like Interpol Serif (from Kombin.at) and Silica by Summer Stone!