-the uc & lc "c" seem top heavy. same problem is there with the lc "e" as well. if you were to extend the bottom line this could be avoided.
-one thing i don't understand is why does the stem in lc "u" and "y" slope, and it doesn't exist on any other stems. i suggest that you put a slant on the top of the leg on the lc "k" and add a slant to the end of the hairline in the lc "x."
-the uc "W" just doesn't do it for me, same thing with the lc "w." the lc "w" looks like it's 2 v's put together. try to integrate them more. the uc "W" looks funny with the extended line in the middle.
-the stroke of the uc "M" and "N" seems too thick compared to the rest of your uc.
I love your letter forms. They're all very light and airy. It's going to look great with just a little bit of tweaking. I hope that my terminology was correct
Much better, in fact, pretty good increase in attention to detail (like in the numeral "8"). I think structurally you're almost finished, but there are still some issues of curve smoothness, alignment (like probably make the curved leg of the "n" go lower), the spacing (seems a bit irregular) and I think it should have a little bit more stroke contrast. Maybe. :-/
24 Oct 2002 — 7:51pm
buenos. here's my two cents:
-the uc & lc "c" seem top heavy. same problem is there with the lc "e" as well. if you were to extend the bottom line this could be avoided.
-one thing i don't understand is why does the stem in lc "u" and "y" slope, and it doesn't exist on any other stems. i suggest that you put a slant on the top of the leg on the lc "k" and add a slant to the end of the hairline in the lc "x."
-the uc "W" just doesn't do it for me, same thing with the lc "w." the lc "w" looks like it's 2 v's put together. try to integrate them more. the uc "W" looks funny with the extended line in the middle.
-the stroke of the uc "M" and "N" seems too thick compared to the rest of your uc.
I love your letter forms. They're all very light and airy. It's going to look great with just a little bit of tweaking. I hope that my terminology was correct
t1mmy
25 Oct 2002 — 8:14am
Rodrigo:
La "@" me parece un poquito cerrada.
La "Ñ" y la "ñ", creo, necesitan mas aire en el "tilde".
IndoSans me parece una bella tipografía.
Me gustaría poder observar los trazos con mayor detalle. No linkeas un PDF?
Abrazo.
Ramiro.
18 Nov 2002 — 3:14pm
Some improvements to my IndoSans.
(pdf file).
Please opinions, thanks.
indo01_02.pdf (200 k)
18 Nov 2002 — 6:38pm
Much better, in fact, pretty good increase in attention to detail (like in the numeral "8"). I think structurally you're almost finished, but there are still some issues of curve smoothness, alignment (like probably make the curved leg of the "n" go lower), the spacing (seems a bit irregular) and I think it should have a little bit more stroke contrast. Maybe. :-/
hhp
9 Feb 2004 — 5:51pm
Hi typo guys!
After a year and more... More IndoSans!
04 Version.
Thanks for all the comments!
Indo04.pdf (82.6 k)
9 Feb 2004 — 5:53pm
Hi typo guys!
After a year and more... More IndoSans!
04 Version.
Thanks for all the comments!
82.6 K
"pdf sample"
10 Feb 2004 — 5:30pm
im enjoying this face quite a lot.
Cheers.
Let me know when you need some 'Beta Testing' done :-)
Hildebrant.