You use the word “contemporary”, be careful that this does not become dated! I would say...fonts like these tend to date very quickly. I would not use them personally. Also think about what you are telling the reader, do you need to tell them you are a “.com” business or can they find that out themselves easily?

The e is the least of your concerns. I see a big pool of white in the g that is very distracting, and the m is driving me nuts because it looks like it’s about 2/3 the size that it should be, especially when compared to the n. Look at it both upside-down and very small to get a better sense of how well the positive and negative spaces are balanced and how the characters relate to each other.

hi
it’s true what you say rydere about contemporary and the dated staff... actually I’ve been thinking quite a lot about that and make my/our decision on that. Actually we have quite clear this staff about “modern” design becoming dated and do so on our designs.
Actually I ask you people because I wanted to do a balance logo cause a well done “contemporary” design use to be less dated.
About the .com staff: we allready spent 6 years with this brand (sometimes with .com sometimes not) and after asking once and again to ourselves this what you are saying (involving all that staff with the dot com companys etc etc) we decided that in the limits that we move, the clients we have and so on... the .com defines quite a lot our company (works we do, way we work) and decide to leave there on the brand.
(right now we’re making our new brand site, there is a very old site there at eragin.com, but at the moment we’ll start using this logo hardly, there’ll be a quite powerfull site, I guess). I really apreciatte what you say, cause I think they are very important staff even this time (wrong or not) they’re allready decided.

Koppa: uh.. your right about the g... I’ll take a look at this. about the M you’re also right, this time it was conscious because if I left the M like it should be it was too big (and I say this related with the .com staff rydere say) and the .com was taking too many space in the logo... uhm... shoddy work? I’ll take a look to this also, maybe I’ll post some of the previous Ms.

thank you very much folks!

Hi

I did some corrections about the g and the m.

the firs in the image is the original one.
the second is the one I use as “good” for the moment: I did an m with the right size and cut a little bit from the inner part of the tail of the g to make that white mass more light(sorry if I don’t explai too clear, but I don’t realy know the english right words for typo).

the third one I made the g more straght, maybe more “right”... but I think I still like the other g, what you think? the m has the first hollow (hole?) a little bit bigger..

at the fourth I tried a diferent g cutting white from the outter part of the tail and leaving the inner as it war.. I think I still like the second... and tried a diferent m but I guess the other m works better with the round rhythm of the other letters.

let me know what you think please.
thanks!

hi there people!

uhm.. would you anyone say something about this? any advice or critique?

I would aprecciate it a lot.

thanks a lot!

Like Koppa mentioned the area of white in the g where the counter meets the descender is distracting in its weightiness, a little work on the open counter might help. Of the m iterations the second of your latest version is an improvement, although the transition of curve to vertical on the right isn’t quite there yet. Overall there is too much overshoot on the characters, exacerbated by there only being three which aren’t curved top and bottom, the r especially is jumping. Rework are the heaviness of the junctions in the e, a, g and, to a lesser extent, n.

Tim

thanks timd and sorry I didn’t say anything.. too bussy months...

Is quite hard to me to understand some of the concepts you use in english but Í’ll do my best...

I’ll post when I have something done about allthose changes.

thanks again