feeback for my personal ID mark

CambriaNK
30.Jan.2008 3.34pm
CambriaNK's picture

Hey everyone!
I am new to the site, but I have some friends that rave about it. I have been working on a personal identity mark the last few weeks. They suggested I put up a couple of my options and get some feedback. I am going for an organic, free flowing form. I want something that is not too serious looking and is delicate and beautiful. Thanks for your help.

Cambria

AttachmentSize
Picture 1.png44.23 KB


FeeltheKern
30.Jan.2008 6.07pm
FeeltheKern's picture

If you’re looking for something delicate and free flowing, it should just be a few deliberate strokes. This ventures dangerously close to a wad of pubes. Definitely potential in these, though.


David Sudweeks
30.Jan.2008 6.15pm
David Sudweeks's picture

If your aim is something beautiful, I would spend some real time developing the most simple of these concepts and simplifying it.
Edit: Pardon; I didn’t see the above post prior to posting. I have nothing to add.


Koppa
30.Jan.2008 8.08pm
Koppa's picture

> a wad of pubes

Wow. That’s the funniest thing I’ve ever read/seen on this forum. LOL! Not to be mean or anything (sorry) but after reading that I had to see for myself! Funny. Sorry. But seriously...I think it’s beautiful in a doilyish way, which I also consider delicate. Nice work. How to improve it?...I concur: Simplify.


aluminum
31.Jan.2008 6.27am
aluminum's picture

“a wad of pubes”

I LOVE that band.


CambriaNK
31.Jan.2008 1.12pm
CambriaNK's picture

lol. oh no. I will put some more time into it. Thanks for the help


CambriaNK
3.Feb.2008 2.32pm
CambriaNK's picture

Alright. I tired to simplify. Is is getting any better or do you guys think that it still needs anymore simplification? Thanks!

Cambria


Hofweber
4.Feb.2008 12.27am
Hofweber's picture

That’s looking clean but also a tad busy. The internal hollow swashes are the strongest part of your image but they’re being severed by their stems. Perhaps moving the stems off to the sides of them could work? Doing with the third one might be your best bet. They’re all looking good though.


Koppa
6.Feb.2008 11.01am
Koppa's picture

It looks like less of a tangle now...a little less. I’m of the less-is-more camp.

A little of this depends upon how you want this to work. My first thought was, “Hmmm...neat idea. Is this part of some new the-artist-formerly-known-as-Prince-inspired trend out in California? Is it something an artist develops for him or herself, or is there a potential market for these sort of things among tragically wealthy and bored metrosexuals?” Either way, to simplify or not to simplify is all a matter of style.

On the other hand, if it’s something you’d like to appear more like a typographical element, like a letter of the alphabet (which to me would be really cool and very difficult), then it’s got a long way to go. It’s far from Caslon or Helvetica!


CambriaNK
10.Feb.2008 1.30pm
CambriaNK's picture

The mark is being developed for me. It will be used on my stationary accompanied with my name. The mark has evolved from my initials into an icon. I put some more work into it. The feedback is helping. Thanks.


missgiggles
10.Feb.2008 2.48pm
missgiggles's picture

Strip down to its skin as much as possible. Even the simplest of forms can still make a mark, or more so I would say. Less is more.


Kirsten Navin
12.Feb.2008 10.42am
Kirsten Navin's picture

I think you should start pairing a few of these with your name. Your icon and name will need to work together. The font you ultimately select will help you determine what other refinements your mark may need.

You’ve made nice progress, keep it up.


Scalfin
12.Feb.2008 8.02pm
Scalfin's picture

Given that you are using this like a seal, complicated imagery is possible. My main warning is that you watch out for it looking too much like a swastika.


Dan Weaver
13.Feb.2008 6.59am
Dan Weaver's picture

I would agree you need to see how you are going to integrate your mark with your name.


eeblet
13.Feb.2008 1.08pm
eeblet's picture

At the risk of seeming like a pube-wad fangirl, I actually like one of the ones in the first image - on the second row, on the right. It had an open free-ness missing in the revised designs.

What did the image look like when you had your initials more referenced?


Koppa
14.Feb.2008 1.35pm
Koppa's picture

I have to agree with the pube-wad-loving Ms. Budwig inasmuchas the open freeness is missing...or, in other words, it has become less delicate. And I couldn’t agree more with the suggestion to pair it with a typeface for comparison and refinements. You have simplified by making it heavier, and I don’t think that’s necessarily necessary.


eeblet
14.Feb.2008 2.38pm
eeblet's picture

Koppa, you realize that you’ve doomed all google searches for my name? ;)


Koppa
15.Feb.2008 8.08am
Koppa's picture

LOL! Sorry. I really should stay away from this sort of thing...these discussions. My recklessness does not lend itself to giving a lot of thought to the ethics of discussion forums on the internet and repercussions of off-hand comments. I’m doing my best not to participate, but sometimes I just get so dang bored! Really, I mean no harm. Just trying to have some fun. And hopefully it will help illustrate your sense of humor...a good thing to have.


eeblet
15.Feb.2008 12.39pm
eeblet's picture

Ha, Koppa no worries. I’ll be entertained if this ends up being the first result for “Budwig”, although I don’t know how my relatives will feel.

Cambria - where did you go? I’m dying to see your latest!


CambriaNK
17.Feb.2008 9.57am
CambriaNK's picture

haha. Sorry I am working on it. I took a break from it to see if I could get some new revelation. I get something up. Thanks for keeping me in check.


Will Miller
17.Feb.2008 11.18am
Will Miller's picture

coming in late to this one, but the mark has not really succeeded in the free flowing category for me. organic i get, systems in nature and the like, but free flowing? looks too contrived. even more so in the later versions with big blocks of fill and a heavy-handed geometry. the mark feels like you really know how to work illustrator very well. take a step back from the computer and see what happens when you use your hands. i think that will open a whole new world for this mark and help take you in a better direction for free flowing/organic

w|m


eeblet
17.Feb.2008 3.58pm
eeblet's picture

I agree with Will! Then again, I always agree with the advice of “get off the computer and try drawing it.”


CambriaNK
19.Feb.2008 9.32pm
CambriaNK's picture

here is what i have again. thanks for the interest


Will Miller
20.Feb.2008 6.09am
Will Miller's picture

while it’s pretty and makes a nice pattern, i don’t think it achieves your free flowing requirement. but i think you have gotten it to where you wanted it to be from the start so hats off. it’s not ugly, just really controlled

w|m


eeblet
20.Feb.2008 4.31pm
eeblet's picture

I really like the two leftmost and the upper rightmost images. Of course, it all depends on how they’re used. Please update with a link if you make a website based on these!


CambriaNK
21.Feb.2008 1.48pm
CambriaNK's picture

awesome.....no website yet...but i will keep you up dated...and will get some attachment type on this thing. ha


ian.brown
17.Mar.2008 11.01am
ian.brown's picture

When I saw your first attempt from 19 February, I immediately thought of the interlocking rings symbol on Led Zeppelin IV:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Zoso.svg

Just saying.

Good luck! :)