Alpesh
14.Feb.2008 4.28am
Alpesh's picture

For a new digital creative agency, tried to steer clear of ’new trends’ and try something a little different and keep to it simple.
Any thoughts on how this could be progressed would be much appreciated

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2302/2264210053_afcc15a259.jpg?v=0

AttachmentSize
effect.jpg566.18 KB


logosam
14.Feb.2008 4.57am
logosam's picture

I like the look. It’s simple, clean, balanced and well rendered.


Alpesh
14.Feb.2008 5.07am
Alpesh's picture

I’m not sure about the ff, its very tight, also what do you think in terms of legability?


bpotstra
14.Feb.2008 6.08am
bpotstra's picture

Yeah, you would want to experiment with raising the ascender of the first ’f’ so it has more breathing room beside (and above) the second ’f’.


James Puckett
14.Feb.2008 10.58am
James Puckett's picture

Fix the ff, either join the ascenders or open things up. Otherwise it’s fab.


eeblet
15.Feb.2008 2.03am
eeblet's picture

Will there be a color treatment? A mark? How do you envision it working on business cards, website, etc? I think it’s great, but will be made way stronger or weaker depending on its setting - straightforward logotypes seem to be more vulnerable to abusive surroundings. ;)


Alpesh
15.Feb.2008 2.31am
Alpesh's picture

I Haven’t really started looking at colour treatments yet trying to fine tune the logo, just want to keep it really clean and simple, as for the website again very minimal lots of white space. I’m looking at a typeface that will work with the logo at the moment does anything spring to mind?


Alpesh
15.Feb.2008 4.59am
Alpesh's picture

Ok, tweaked the spacing, think it looks much better


logosam
15.Feb.2008 6.42am
logosam's picture

Your “f-e” spacing is correct but your “f’s” are too far apart.


eeblet
15.Feb.2008 12.42pm
eeblet's picture

I agree that the f’s are a bit too far apart now. For the web page, a Grotesk-ish anti-aliased font for headlines and aliased verdana for body is how I’d go. I’d also be tempted to have the page not entirely white, but with some dark grey as at least a partial background color.

Huh, I just realized this logo reminds me of Veer’s (which is a compliment), and that my description of fonts for the website is probably some unconscious mimicking of Veer.


Scalfin
15.Feb.2008 12.52pm
Scalfin's picture

Could we see what it would look like if you made an e-f ligature and replaced the e-c ligature with a c-t, or combined them into a three letter cursive.


Alpesh
18.Feb.2008 6.53am
Alpesh's picture

few more tweaks...

Thinking about maybe putting the logo in a box or a circle?


Alpesh
18.Feb.2008 8.40am
Alpesh's picture

cant see the attached image??


Miss Tiffany
18.Feb.2008 3.03pm
Miss Tiffany's picture

I like how you’ve tweaked the shapes. I vote for letter A. Nice balance in it.


subcons
18.Feb.2008 4.44pm
subcons's picture

I can’t see the new revision... and I want to because I’m liking it from the previous posts.


Alpesh
3.Mar.2008 7.24am
Alpesh's picture

This is how the logos looking now, using Akzidenz Grotesk as our corporate typeface, together with Arial for web

Primary Logo
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3067/2307909132_9a545ab42d_o.jpg

Secondary Logo (blind embossed on stationary)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2038/2307101715_4ff177869d_o.jpg

Thanks for everyones comments and feedback

cheers
Pesh


eeblet
21.Mar.2008 10.13pm
eeblet's picture

“Photo unavailable” - could you repost?


Asvetic
26.Mar.2008 6.19pm
Asvetic's picture

This is why people need to upload images to the site and not supply links to outside sites.


Ratbaggy
7.Apr.2008 3.02pm
Ratbaggy's picture

looks like it was uploaded to the site Asvetic.

;)

—————
Paul Ducco
Logo Design Melbourne