Not a Mac vs. PC question

afonseca1974
18.Feb.2008 3.51pm
afonseca1974's picture

OK, I’ve read with attention some Mac vs. PC posts here.
Dont want to add any other discution about it.
My question is:
Want to buy a PC laptop for graphic design/type design/multimedia development.
So I use photoshop/freehand (perhaps upgrad to illustrator...)/flash/premiere/dreamweaver.
What do “Typophile” pros use?
Brand and model...Pros and againt
Thanks in advance

Thanks
António



Thomas Phinney
18.Feb.2008 4.29pm
Thomas Phinney's picture

Second, a general comment: brand and model are interesting, but key specs are at least as important. For example, I have a Lenovo (“IBM”) ThinkPad T61P. But how I got that configured (screen size/resolution, memory, hard drive size) is a lot more relevant.

Generally, I recommend that you get 2 GB of RAM. Regular 32-bit Windows can’t address more than 3 GB, and any less than 2 GB is a false economy for performance. If your budget is tight, you’re better off getting a slower processor but still getting 2 GB of RAM. For whatever model you pick, you probably want the biggest hard drive you can reasonably afford before the prices start escalating crazily.

Related to screen size, a host of related questions: Will you be using an external monitor for most of your serious work, or will you be relying on the built-in LCD screen of the laptop most of the time? Do you have good eyesight and a high tolerance for small stuff on screen? How much What format of outlines are you likely to mainly be working on? (Which is implicitly looking for “what em square size are you likely to be working with in your type design work?”)

Cheers,

T


Hofweber
18.Feb.2008 4.51pm
Hofweber's picture

If I understand it right you want to know what we use regardless of whether it’s PC or Mac. I use a Macbook Pro 15.4” base model. 15.4 inches is getting on the big side and isn’t quite as portable as I would like it to be. Whatever computer you get though, consider it an investment.


DanGayle
18.Feb.2008 4.51pm
DanGayle's picture

I find that the build quality of lesser known, and cheaper, brands is only so-so. People are still lugging around their old Powerbooks because they are built more tank-like, so I suggest that in addition to the specs, you also look for decent build quality.

Compared to other graphics applications, font production is fairly low in resource consumption. But Thomas’ recommendations above still apply if you value your time and your sanity :)

Also, Freehand is dead.


John Hudson
18.Feb.2008 4.55pm
John Hudson's picture

Over the years, I’ve used Sony laptops (definitely not recommended), Toshiba laptops (pretty good, but I had repetetive trouble with hard drives), and a Panasonic ’Toughbook’ (a nice lightweight travel machine, but a bit slow). But by far the best computers I have bought have been from Dell. I have one large Dell Inspiron 9100 laptop that I’ve used as my main machine for the past three and a half years, and recently bought the small Dell XPS 1330 to use as a travel machine. I particularly like the customisability of Dell computers: I maximised the RAM and got the fastest CPU option for the XPS 1330, and it is blisteringly fast compared to my older Dell.

Thomas, as I understand it, 32-bit Windows only provides applications with a 3GB flat virtual address space, but kernel components will address a separate gigabyte. So 4GB is the actual limit (which is what I got in my XPS, and I hope I didn’t waste money on an unused gigabyte of RAM!). But in order to provide access to the full 3GB, either the computer manufacturer or administrator needs to set the /3GB flag in the boot.ini (in pre-Vista versions of Windows)

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms791558.aspx

or the IncreaseUserVA in BCDEdit (Windows Vista)

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa906211.aspx

If you are buying a computer with more than 3GB of RAM, you may reasonably expect the manufacturer to set this, but you can ask them to confirm this.


agostini
18.Feb.2008 5.21pm
agostini's picture

I’m working on a Mac intel box, 2x 2.66GHZ Dual core intel
with only one gig ram and a cinema screen. But in the end it
doesnt really matter, like in life: size doesn’t matter so much
it’s is more what you can do with it.

The only thing i wouldn’t get is freehand, dead software and
Prepress-wise a pain in the butt, i would say it is better to
invest in illustrator.


fontplayer
18.Feb.2008 5.50pm
fontplayer's picture

With any laptop, my experience is it that the extended warranty is a good investment. Dell has been good for me, but I heard they moved tech support to India, and my friend says sometimes they are hard to understand. Fortunately at my company, if your Dell laptop acts up, our contract is set so someone will come fix it in a day.

If for some reason you decide to get a Mac that can boot WIndows, everyone I know says the Applecare is a good investment.


jasonc
18.Feb.2008 6.56pm
jasonc's picture

I second Thomas’ opinion on 2gb RAM. That was my #1 requirement in buying the last machine I bought.


afonseca1974
19.Feb.2008 5.57am
afonseca1974's picture

Thanks all for the opinions!

1-I will change to illustrator. I already made that decision couple of months a go...but I will miss the multipage thing- Illustrator dont have it rigth? Why Adobe dont “steal” that from freehand? Its hard to implement or they think people dont care for that?

2- I will buy a PC. Not mac.

3- I know that the screen size/resolution, memory, hard drive size ar important factors that I will not forgett

4-Thomas Phinney: I Will not be using an external monitor for most of my work. So I will rely on the built-in LCD screen of the laptop. I have good eyesight and a high tolerance for small stuff on screen.

5-So what good laptop models are there with my specifications?

Thanks again.

António Fonseca


aluminum
19.Feb.2008 6.44am
aluminum's picture

I’ve owned/used the following brands:

Apple: 1 great laptop. 1 decent one that crapped out after 2 years.
Dell: 1 that crapped out more than once
Toshiba: Crapped out after about two years.
Sony: Has never ’fully’ crapped out, but has been on disability since day one with clicking hard drives, dead WiFi and batteries that die every 6 months.

So, uh...hmm...I don’t think it matters. I’d suggest going cheap and just plan on upgrading every couple of years.

All that said, everyone seems to love their Lenovos (what used to be IBM laptops)


aluminum
19.Feb.2008 7.28am
aluminum's picture

Also, FYI, I assume you wanting a PC = you want to run windows. The MacBook Pro was rated as one of the fastest (if not fastest) laptop for running Vista. So, if performance is a priority, you might want to add that to your list. Alas, I appears you live outside the US, and, as such, I know Apple hardware can be significantly more expensive.


jupiterboy
19.Feb.2008 8.22am
jupiterboy's picture

Machine Name: Power Mac G5
Machine Model: PowerMac7,2
CPU Type: PowerPC 970 (2.2)
Number Of CPUs: 2
CPU Speed: 2 GHz
L2 Cache (per CPU): 512 KB
Memory: 2.5 GB
Bus Speed: 1 GHz

Starting to show weakness. I had a Mac Clone before, and a Mac IIci before that.


Don McCahill
19.Feb.2008 8.50am
Don McCahill's picture

> ...but I will miss the multipage thing- Illustrator dont have it rigth? Why Adobe dont “steal” that from freehand? Its hard to implement or they think people dont care for that?

Macromedia made Freehand multipage because they didn’t have a pagination option. Adobe does with InDesign. AI is primarily for vector illustrations, and I don’t see it becoming multi page (although perhaps a two or four page option would be nice to be able to keep front and back, or packaging options in a single file.


aluminum
19.Feb.2008 9.32am
aluminum's picture

“Why Adobe dont “steal” that from freehand? Its hard to implement or they think people dont care for that?”

They want you to buy InDesign. ;o)

Freehand was a really great multi-purpose tool. Had it gotten the care and attention it needed several versions back, it might have been an excellent page layout application in addition to a fine illustration tool.

I do miss Freehand.

Alas, it’s dead. In fact, it’s been on life support for quite a while, even when it was still in Macromedia’s hands.


afonseca1974
19.Feb.2008 9.43am
afonseca1974's picture

I use freehand for more than 13 years. It was Aldus at the time...I think
I always draw my company labels and boxes in freehand. It was great to have a file with mutiple pages. One for original other converted to paths to production, other in cmyk for other prints, and special the file with another blueprint page with regular information printed to be send in Fax or to print a copy to be sign, etc.
The fact that I could develop a logo in a page then duplicate in the same file several “directions” and print them all as independent page with the need to open extra files (and the time consuming...) are things that were with me.
Of course today I can di that with Indesign...but 12 years ago I could do it with freehand...and still do:-)

António


John Hudson
19.Feb.2008 9.47am
John Hudson's picture

So what good laptop models are there with my specifications?

I recommend going to the Dell website, selecting a base model of the size you want, and then going through the customisation options to get the specs you want. If screen resolution is important to you, keep an eye out for the 1920x1200 screen options.


crossgrove
19.Feb.2008 10.24am
crossgrove's picture

Antonio,

Though it isn’t the same thing, you might like the “layers” function in Illustrator; each layer can be turned off, locked, set to print or not print, act as template, or whatever; then you can discard certain layers and save the file as a different version. I think “export visible layers” would make things easy. That might do some of what Freehand did for you. Layers are absolutely essential to working with map data.


eeblet
19.Feb.2008 1.30pm
eeblet's picture

I switched to PC a few years ago (because I am a reactionary, OK?), so I say this not as an apple fangirl: don’t go Dell for a laptop!!! Everyone I know with a Dell laptop has had it fall apart in a couple of years, and it’s better to remove your eyes with a spoon than talk with their tech support. Also, it takes an awful lot to get rid of all the bloatware that comes with their computers. Spend the extra money on something with good hardware and tech support (HP? IBM? I dunno).

Right now I work exclusively on a silent PC desktop built by my boyfriend - it works like a charm, was under $1000 (including the 22” monitor), and had no bloatware. Unfortunately, that helps not at all for laptops.

Good luck!


afonseca1974
19.Feb.2008 3.51pm
afonseca1974's picture

hmm...
As darrel stated I dont live in US. I’m Portuguese. So here apple computers are very expensive not only to buy but also in support...
For example:
MacBook Pro 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 15 inch costs in US $2,499.00. In Portugal costs 3,532.89 !!!!!!!!! With this money I could fly to New york buy the computer and come back and probably still save some money :-)

Beth (against) and other (in favor) spoke for Dell. Dell computers are hard to find here also.

The easy and economic are HP, Sony, Acer, Asus, Fujitsu Siemens and Toshiba.

John Hudson
I have to check wich models have 1920x1200 screen option.

Any further comments?

António


Eluard
19.Feb.2008 3.59pm
Eluard's picture

Maybe it’s true: the best PC you can get for running Windows is… a Mac.

My current laptop is a Titanium Powerbook 667 and it runs very well with nary a squeak of a problem. And I know that I am not the only one who hangs on to their Powerbooks. I have never heard of a PC laptop that will be reliable and in use some seven years down the track. I fully expect mine will last for another two years, bringing it to nine years old.


Eluard
19.Feb.2008 4.01pm
Eluard's picture

António — we posted simultaneously. Apple is expensive in Australia as well, but in the long run they are worth it.


fontplayer
19.Feb.2008 4.11pm
fontplayer's picture

How about a trip to Costco in England? Here in the US they usually have good deals, and back it up nicely.


sii
19.Feb.2008 7.23pm
sii's picture

>So here apple computers are very expensive not only to buy but also in support...

You did ask “what do the pros use?” One of the reasons the pros have Macs is because it helps them hike their rates. Put yourself in the shoes of a client - two designers are pitching for a job - one’s charging $90 an hour and toting a four year old HP notebook, the other’s charging $120 an hour and has a spanking new Mac Book Air - which would you pick?


John Hudson
19.Feb.2008 8.53pm
John Hudson's picture

Everyone I know with a Dell laptop has had it fall apart in a couple of years, and it’s better to remove your eyes with a spoon than talk with their tech support.

I’ve heard such things. But I’ve been using my big Dell for three and a half years without any problems, and the couple of times I needed to call tech support the service was excellent. Now, I did pay extra for a business support account, and I did choose a high-end model with the best component options. Perhaps this makes a difference.


DanGayle
20.Feb.2008 12.39am
DanGayle's picture

You mentioned ASUS. They’re actually quite good because they supply the parts to a lot of the “branded” laptops. Quality hardware.

In fact, if you do a little digging, a lot of the big time laptops are really re-branded something or another.

For instance, Alienware machines are in reality just a few doodads and whatsits and glowing-eyed alien cases added onto other company’s hardware. Start comparing specs and Googling/newegg-ing/researching, and eventually you can find the source of the base computer.

If you can find it, many times you can save money due to the “brand” discount. Of course, you’re taking a humongous risk because tech support will be non-existent or Japanese :)


eeblet
20.Feb.2008 1.24pm
eeblet's picture

“one’s charging $90 an hour and toting a four year old HP notebook, the other’s charging $120 an hour and has a spanking new Mac Book Air - which would you pick?”

Sii, if I liked them equally, I’d pick the one without the Apple premium.

If I could afford a new, awesome, Mac, I’d get one - but it would be in spite of it being a status symbol. My focus is on usability and communication - if a client wants me to have a trendy haircut, designer jeans, and a MacBook, it’s just not gonna work out. This may also be why I can’t afford a brand new Mac. ;)


afonseca1974
20.Feb.2008 6.22pm
afonseca1974's picture

Simon
I wouldn’t choose a designer from is computer. I prefer his work ;-)

Found this here in Portugal. Anyone has experiences with this brand?

António


cuttlefish
20.Feb.2008 9.16pm
cuttlefish's picture

I was not aware Packard Bell was still in business. I have heard their hardware has a bad reputation, but that is not based on personal experience. They used to have a cute logo with a head, but it appears that they don’t use it anymore.


DanGayle
20.Feb.2008 9.28pm
DanGayle's picture

I was going to say the same thing about Packard Bell. I thought they were bought out by HP or Compaq or whatever.


eeblet
20.Feb.2008 10.57pm
eeblet's picture

BTW, my boyfriend recommends Toshiba of the brands you listed. He’s built several PCs, and is up on all that jazz. Good luck!


aluminum
21.Feb.2008 7.10am
aluminum's picture

Wow...Packard Bell? Back from the dead? When they were alive they were awful. Now that they are a zombie, I can’t imagine they’ve improved at all.


Don McCahill
21.Feb.2008 8.03am
Don McCahill's picture

I sold Packard Bell computers for a time when they were still available in Canada. They had a horrid return rate. Also a disaster for service.

That doesn’t mean that they haven’t cleaned up their act in the last 15 years.


David Sudweeks
21.Feb.2008 10.41am
David Sudweeks's picture

I’m very happy with my PC notebook. It’s an HP nc4010. I bought it used on eBay. These are the commercial line of notebook; think of it as a wholly different company from HP’s consumer line notebooks. I’ve had it for nearly four years. Support is handled over the internet and mine came with a three-year warranty, standard. If you’re looking for current models of these, just shop around. I believe the nc line is still going. If so, those are built the best.


Freeza
21.Feb.2008 12.09pm
Freeza's picture

Seems like i’m the only Asus user :) I have a Asus G1s Laptop.

-

www.nunocoelho.com


Thomas Phinney
21.Feb.2008 6.49pm
Thomas Phinney's picture

António:

So, based on your reply about screens and monitors, the other key thing I’d say is that you have the same screen need I do: at least 1200 vertical pixels of resolution to be able to do type design work efficiently right on your laptop. You can get a standard-ratio screen at 1600 x 1200, or a wide-screen at 1920 x 1200. But this factor alone will likely significantly narrow your choices - which is probably helpful.

John Hudson and others are correct about RAM on PCs. I’m not saying that more than 2 GB is completely wasted, just that the biggest functional jump and bang for the buck is going from 1 GB to 2 GB. If you make heavy use of Premiere, maybe even 4 GB would be useful.

Cheers,

T


Chipman223
22.Feb.2008 12.47pm
Chipman223's picture

They make plenty of Dells and stuff now with the same quad-core processors that the Mac Pros use (although they use two), but in agreement with the second post, worry about the ram as well. 2gigs is fantastic. Maybe more if you’re doing motion (also, a better graphics card would help). I know you don’t want a mac, but my suggestions would be to look at the specs on the new mac pro, and find a PC with the same. It’d probably be about a grand less just to get rid of the apple logo.


Sebastian Nagel
22.Feb.2008 2.23pm
Sebastian Nagel's picture

I currently use a IBM/Lenovo Thinkpad R60 with 2ghz Core2 Duo, 2GB RAM, 7200rpm hard drive, 1400×1050px screen (a compromise between space and size), Windows XP. When working local, it’s placed in a docking station, connected to a normal keyboard, mouse, large screen, scanner, external hard drive, etc.
I use it 70% local, and 30% mobile. If you are more mobile, you might want a T-series model, but the other series are quite ok as well.

Thinkpads are expensive, but much more affordable today, and they are robust, don’t look like pseudo wannabe “design”, but are streamlined for real usability.