I've been working on this project in a cave, and I think I'm at a point where I can use some criticism from the pros. This is my first real book project, that is, the first book project I have full control over as far as art direction and type/graphic standards.
It's an 11x11" art book--a survey of the themes of Apocalypse and Rapture in contemporary art.
I'm in the stage of developing standards for displaying the varying written pieces in the book. The challenge is that every written piece has its own specific function (letter from the editor, essay on the themes, radio transcripts, poem, and indexes), so I'm straddling a threshold of displaying them all appropriately for what they are, yet having some harmony with one another--staying within the same grid system, using the same typefaces, and so on.
In it's current stage, it's pure type.
I'd like to dive into the forensics of all my decisions down to point sizes and baseline offsetting, but I think right now I should save that for later and just get an idea for what you 'philes think, and if there's any immediate reactions / no-no's that are spotted.
The goal is to respect the grid, respect readability, be reserved in the approach, aim for timelessness, but move beyond the default systems.
Let me know what you think!
**edit** can't get file attachment working here, so I've uploaded it to my ftp: