Emigre... Are you still using some of them?

David R
2.Jun.2008 4.46am
David R's picture

I was wondering about Emigre’s types. A few years ago they were top of the hype, so much overused that they are now paying the price of success; I can’t go through Emigre’s catalog without seeing “1990” written everywhere. I mean, apart from a few types (Malaga, Vista, Mrs Eaves, Tribute), who can actually still use today types such as Triplex, Matrix Script, Keedy, Dogma, Democratica, Dead History or Citizen?

dr



Chipman223
2.Jun.2008 5.48am
Chipman223's picture

Some of their faces look dated, but they don’t even have all the ones they originally started with (i think one was Berkley). They’re constantly reinventing their typefaces (Matrix II) because I think they realize this. Licko, Keedy, etc. were some of the first good type designers on the digital platform, and thusly did a lot of experimentation. So I think their type shows a sort of progression through the late 80s to now. I guess my answer is yes, some do look dated, but I would count on them constantly updating and adding new, more contemporary faces. I wouldn’t be surprised to look back at any foundry’s work ten years from now and think the same thing. I still personally enjoy the italics for triplex as well as the caps. Those curves on the stems of the lowercase really bug me though.

I remember seeing Citizen on the cover for the movie Black Hawk Down.


James Puckett
2.Jun.2008 7.24am
James Puckett's picture

I recently purchased Matrix II Book to use in a contest entry that never got submitted because I got busy with other stuff. I’ll probably end up using it at some point, but very carefully, because any time I see it lately it’s on some low-budget ad or sign and looks dreadfully awful.

As for the 1990s fonts, I wouldn’t go anywhere near them. Sometimes I use the Brody stuff from that era, but the wacky Emigre types are just horrid. Like the magazine they did a great job of inspiring importan discourse about typography, but like the magazine, no sane person wants to try reading them today.


bruzs
2.Jun.2008 8.12am
bruzs's picture

oh man, are you saying that that emigre fonts are horrid and at the same time using fonts like brody? :)


Miss Tiffany
2.Jun.2008 2.21pm
Miss Tiffany's picture

Everything that is old will be new again. The 80s are totally hot right now. Just wait a little bit.

I still have use for a few of the less eccentric Emigre fonts. I licensed the entire library back in the 90s and then licensed some of the newer stuff after that. Many of there fonts are still usable. Those listed are the more eccentric though.


Chiba Chiba
2.Jun.2008 5.31pm
Chiba Chiba's picture

You’re right Miss Tiffany!
“What goes around, comes around kid”
A 90’s revival is waiting in line. Be sure that after this neon nu rave trend is gone, it will take it’s place. Techy—decon here we go again. :P


James Puckett
2.Jun.2008 8.37pm
James Puckett's picture

@Andrius: It’s a style thing. The Brody fonts have a really warm futurist feeling. The Emigre fonts have more of a dirty anarchic feeling that reminds me of all those awful bands from the 1990s who couldn’t stop whining about how much it sucked to be white, male, and middle-class. I wasn’t a design then, and don’t really want to revisit the era.


sii
2.Jun.2008 9.39pm
sii's picture

Being stuck in the 80s / 90s is at least two decades ahead of where graphic design currently is, based on best selling fonts... http://www.linotype.com/37/fontcharts.html


Miss Tiffany
2.Jun.2008 10.09pm
Miss Tiffany's picture

@James: Emigre fonts don’t strike me as dirty. In fact, I don’t really associate many of their fonts with the grunge movement at all. Really?


bruzs
3.Jun.2008 12.29am
bruzs's picture

@James: I think its more an attitude than a style thing, maybe that dirty anarchistic feeling which You see in emigre fonts is an attitude formed by all those awful bands from 90s? Brody typefaces is maybe good, but emigre fonts i think is much better - distinctive style, content, meaning, phylosophy those are things because of which these faces is so good, and using these fonts is another thing. And feeling is just a feeling its a thing superficial, warm futuristic feeling today, will be weak outdated feeling tomorow its all influence of context. dont agree?


David R
3.Jun.2008 12.31am
David R's picture

Well according to me, here are emigre’s fonts I wouldn’t want to use for looking really outdated:

Apollo
Arbitrary
Backspacer
Base 9 and 12
Base Monospace
Citizen
Council
Dalliance
Dead History
Democratica
Dogma
Eidetic
Elliott’s
Exocet
Journal
Keedy
Lo-Res
Los Feliz
Lunatix
Matrix II
Matrix II Display
Missionary
Modula
Modula Round
Motion
Narly
NotCaslon
Oblong
Ottomat
OutWest
Platelet
Poppi
Priori
Remedy
Senator
Soda Script
Suburban
Tall Pack
Template Gothic
Thingbat
Totally Gothic
Variex

though I licensed and used many of these in the past.

that leaves about 10 fonts... not much.

dr


dtw
3.Jun.2008 3.56am
dtw's picture

Phew! You didn’t mention Tarzana there David, so that lets Feminist Review off the hook then...
:-D
______________________________________________
Ever since I chose to block pop-ups, my toaster’s stopped working.


David R
3.Jun.2008 7.32am
David R's picture

well, tarzana is still usable i guess... no?

dr


David R
3.Jun.2008 7.34am
David R's picture

By the way, I could also have named all the oversized x-heights fonts from ITC... pretty hard to use today as well, thanks to george lois and his total control of the american ads in the 1970’s.

dr


dtw
3.Jun.2008 7.53am
dtw's picture

@DavidR: Yes, but not the prettiest of faces for running text (example).

I’m keeping my ears to the ground for the first hint that my publishing colleagues might consider a redesign, ready to pounce with some better suggestions...
______________________________________________
Ever since I chose to block pop-ups, my toaster’s stopped working.


pattyfab
3.Jun.2008 8.01am
pattyfab's picture

I still use some of the Emigre fonts - Filosofia, Mrs. Eaves, Tribute, Dalliance, Base, Eidetic

Matrix still feels way too 90s (and I never liked it much to begin with) and some of the Emigre fonts are just too out there to imagine actually using ever such as Variex and Citizen.

I have not licensed any of their fonts in awhile tho. Considered Vista and Malaga but don’t like the squared off lc ’a’.


Chipman223
3.Jun.2008 8.26am
Chipman223's picture

@David:

Au Bon Pain uses Dalliance effectively, I’ve seen missionary used quite well in fashion magazines, and I think I’d have to outright disagree on Matrix II, Los Feliz, Eidetic, Council, and especially Priori (although Barnbrook’s work can be equally hit or miss). I also don’t mind the caps for Ottomat, but that’s pushing it. I don’t think Poppi even qualifies, I think it looks rather modern myself.

There is a case to be made for a lot of the others; remedy looks like the paying man’s Party LET. Most of the ones that you and I agree on were made more than ten years ago.

Once again though, Filosofia, Mrs Eaves, Tarzana, Vista, &c seem to be their recent breadwinners, so I’d count on Emigre producing those more-so than something like lunatix. I feel as if Emigre has done well recently distancing themselves from trendy/fad-y themes.


Ehague
3.Jun.2008 9.53am
Ehague's picture

Cholla was turn-of-the-century Emigre, but I think it (still) looks fantastic. Especially the slab ultra bold.


pattyfab
3.Jun.2008 10.31am
pattyfab's picture

I also just used Solex quite effectively for a project.

And there is a book on my table right here (not designed by me) that manages to use Not Caslon - and well. I never thought I’d see that.

Dalliance has unfortunately become the go to font for middle eastern/asian themed books. I used it for a logo for some Indian sauces when it was still new, but now it looks like I’m a copycat.


Eben Sorkin
3.Jun.2008 11.12am
Eben Sorkin's picture

I think the Vista series and Malaga are plenty fine.

In certain circs Vendetta shows well, and I still have a warm feeling towards Journal.

Moreover, I think Brothers is going to last and last. Which isn’t surprising given its designer and his inspiration which was a solid historical style.


mondoB
3.Jun.2008 11.35am
mondoB's picture

Like every other foundry with a strong profile, you just have to pick and choose, and let them worry about their own shelf life. Cholla, Filosofia, Malaga, and Vendetta (tho it looks so small) all work well, stylish and just timeless enough. And, I should add, they’re still gently priced. Storm Foundry’s historical revivals also have eccentricities that require discrimination and care. And the point above about all those high-x-height ITC faces from the 70s, originally intended for advertising instead of regular editorial use—that’s true too. You just have to pick and choose.


James Puckett
3.Jun.2008 11.50am
James Puckett's picture

@Tiffany: Sorry, I need to stop posting before the coffee kicks in. It’s not that I associate some Emigres type directly with grunge so much as I just see them as important elements of 1990s culture that I don’t really miss. Like Nirvana, they’re important and shouldn’t be forgotten, but they served their purpose and I think it’s time to move on.


aszszelp
3.Jun.2008 12.28pm
aszszelp's picture

Ehague,

I just wanted to praise Cholla as a very usable font. Of course, only in moderation, but here and there _very_ usable. Just listened to a talk by the designer of it a week ago or so.

Szabolcs


Miss Tiffany
3.Jun.2008 2.32pm
Miss Tiffany's picture

Sometimes something seemingly inappropriate can really work if used appropriately. Yes, quite a few of their fonts scream 90s to those of us who lived it. But, on the other hand, if you take away what we know about the typeface and try to see it with fresh eyes many of them are still useful.


Eben Sorkin
3.Jun.2008 3.00pm
Eben Sorkin's picture

I have to agree with Tiff. In some cases how you use a type can matter almost as much as the design of the type. Depending on what you are making. That isn’t true for every application. Also, this kind of use is a high level skill I think. Not every designer can do it.


kris
3.Jun.2008 4.22pm
kris's picture

“There are only two kinds of typefaces: those you know how to use and those you do not”

—K


Eben Sorkin
3.Jun.2008 7.39pm
Eben Sorkin's picture

Kris, you don’t buy the idea that somebody can find fresh new ways of using a classic ( or not classic) face? I am not saying this is what you comment implies but it’s hard to be sure...


Chipman223
3.Jun.2008 9.01pm
Chipman223's picture

you don’t buy the idea that somebody can find fresh new ways of using a classic ( or not classic) face?

I don’t want to put words in anyone’s mouth, but I didn’t get “you cant teach an old dog new tricks,” but rather that any typeface can be used well, it’s just a matter of knowing how to do so. I would agree 100% if Sand didn’t exist, but I get the idea :)


Eben Sorkin
3.Jun.2008 9.16pm
Eben Sorkin's picture

Hmm - yes! It could be “know how to use” is meant in a plural manner.


ionsierra
4.Jun.2008 7.17am
ionsierra's picture

Let’s see...
I use Eidetic Neo for church-related graphics.
Emigre Lo-Res fonts are good for Flash
Dalliance Script
Solex is still pretty hot.
Tarzana also.
And so are
Matrix Script (in moderation)
Filosophia
Mrs. Eaves
Vendetta
Brothers
Cholla
Long live Exocet!

Occasionally, I’ll get a client who digs the 90’s/Emigre style.
No hesitation on my part.

Anybody ever successfully use the Apollo “Elliot’s” fonts?


Zato3
4.Jun.2008 9.35am
Zato3's picture

This kind of article should be beneath Typophile. It’s no less than black PR. If you have interesting critical things to say about a typeface, then fine. But to call or even suggest an entire catalogue “dead history” is not going to make you any friends at Emigre, or among those who like the fonts. And makes me wonder why you would do it.


James Puckett
4.Jun.2008 10.08am
James Puckett's picture

@Zato: Nobody here is dumping on the entire Emigre catalog, we’re discussing whether or not we use some of the Emigre designs in our own work and our reasons for making these font choices.


Miss Tiffany
4.Jun.2008 10.54am
Miss Tiffany's picture

There are quite a few foundries who are scrambling to reinvent their catalogues monthly to keep it current. I think Emigre has done a great job of that. They don’t seem to discount their past work and proudly list it next to the new stuff. People thought Helvetica was dead and it came back with a feature film. Sure, Helvetica is probably more ubiquitous, but that isn’t to say that Emigre’s faces don’t still hold a spot in our current libraries.


David R
4.Jun.2008 1.03pm
David R's picture

Hey Zato,

I am actually writing a book about typography, and in this book I wrote a full article about Zuzana Licko’s Mrs Eaves, and another one about Xavier Dupre’s Vista, in which I say a lot of nice things. I am actually in regular contact with Ms Licko herself, and everything is fine. I have been one of the biggest fans of Emigre since years, I have countless printed specimens, Emigre magazines, I receive their catalog and I actually have some of the typefaces licensed. I also wrote, and think, that it’s becoming increasingly hard to use most of these types today mostly because of their success in the nineties, which is not rude or bad or whatever, but simply true. Read again, mate, because that is really what I said, asking the fellow typophiles around their point of view, which is sometimes the same, sometimes very different. I, for example, agree totally with Tiffany when she says that Emigre proudly stands by their old designs, and I didn’t think of it that way before; I came to this different point of view through discussing with the clever people around.

Now, this being said, you subscribed here 8 weeks ago, and you posted only one messsage - this one. Do *you* actually have any interesting critic to formulate?

Cheers,
dr


bieler
4.Jun.2008 10.37pm
bieler's picture

“Being stuck in the 80s / 90s is at least two decades ahead of where graphic design currently is, based on best selling fonts... “

Weird, ever consider looking forward? taking a peak at what just might be 21st century design/typography? No revolutionaries here? just reactionaries?

I guess this backward-looking thing is what they call turn-of-the-century “future shock.”

Gerald


David R
4.Jun.2008 11.02pm
David R's picture

bieler:

I guess history bites its own tail... New stuff will come along, but 80’s and 90’s big comeback is definitely on the way. that’s human nature.

I think Neville Brody agrees with me on this one :-)

dr


Zato3
4.Jun.2008 11.18pm
Zato3's picture

This is what you wrote: Emigre... Are you still using some of them?

I was wondering about Emigre’s types. A few years ago they were top of the hype, so much overused that they are now paying the price of success; I can’t go through Emigre’s catalog without seeing “1990” written everywhere. I mean, apart from a few types (Malaga, Vista, Mrs Eaves, Tribute), who can actually still use today types such as Triplex, Matrix Script, Keedy, Dogma, Democratica, Dead History or Citizen?

“top of the hype” ....what exactly do you mean here? Hype has a negative connotation.
“so much overused that they are now paying the price of success”. Really? So if you do excellent creative work, and it becomes popular, you’ll “pay a price” later?

“I mean, apart from a few types (Malaga, Vista, Mrs Eaves, Tribute), who can actually still use today types such as...” Right, I see. No one should use these fonts-they’re just not the hype anymore.


Chipman223
5.Jun.2008 6.01am
Chipman223's picture

@Zato

I think someone hit a nerve, but I don’t think David intended to be disdainful to Rudy, Zuzana &c. I’m a huge Emigre fanboy (proud owner of an Emigre tshirt-in Dogma no less), but that doesn’t mean we can’t offer some criticism. I prefer to think of Emigre’s types as fashionable. Imagine what the clothes from high-fashion designers from Paris, Milan and New York were making in the late 80s and early 90s. Emigre was kind of the place where typefaces were rethought, and the result was a lot of experimental type designs. Some were successful in the short run, some not at all, and some that I don’t think that I could work without. I’m actually starting to lean towards Mrs Eaves being sort of fad-y.

Hype has a negative connotation.
Sometimes, yes. Emigre was hyped and criticized. What David is saying is nothing new. I believe Massimo Vignelli and Paul Rand would truly have gotten a reaction out of you.

@ David
I am actually in regular contact with Ms Licko herself, and everything is fine.
Can you get me a signed specimen book? ;)


David R
5.Jun.2008 6.02am
David R's picture

Hey Zato, welcome back and congrats on your second post.

- For me, “top of the hype” means “trendy, successful”. sorry if it’s not the actual meaning, english is not my mothertongue. doin’ my best. looking back at the sentence, it was quite obvious, though.

- When something is overused, it pays the price of success: well, yes, it’s sad but true. when a talented artist makes something which totally fits its era and is overused, it gets so much associated with it that on the day the fashion changes, the work (in this case, a typeface) follows the path to oblivion and shame. You think i’m wrong? well, cooper black was “top of the hype” in 1968, and it was the synonym of cheap in 2000. brody was “top of the hype” in 1987, and you can hardly find one of his types in use today. 90% of aldo novarese’s types are unavailable on a digital format today, because nobody wants them; even though he was a great artist, his types were so much used in the sixties and seventies that they are now “paying the price”. it’s very sad, yes; it is as sad as admitting that it’s hard for me today to use typefaces i really, really loved, such as dogma or triplex, but it’s a fact.

- who can actually use these types today: that was a question, you know. I know i can not use these types anymore myself, not because they are not top of the hype, but because they have been once. so i was wondering if anyone else can, with success. and then I had interesting answers. and then, I had yours.

hope you understood me this time, if no i’ll explain again, no problem.

dr


David R
5.Jun.2008 6.06am
David R's picture

Chipman:

“Can you get me a signed specimen book?”

my book? with pleasure.

a specimen from emigre signed by Ms Licko? well, at least i can try :-)

dr


Chipman223
5.Jun.2008 6.18am
Chipman223's picture

I meant the latter (and was kidding, don’t worry), but I’d be very interested in reading your book, and hearing what it covers (or who else you’ve talked to) in the mean time. I won’t do any post hijacking though.


pattyfab
5.Jun.2008 7.35am
pattyfab's picture

Helvetica is probably more ubiquitous

Well... given it comes bundled into every operating system, then yes.


Eben Sorkin
5.Jun.2008 10.41am
Eben Sorkin's picture

It does seem like type has a cycle of excitement over novelty and distinctive voice and then a return to core values and around again as the core values start to feel too staid. But the cycle may be disrupted now. Or the cycles may be getting closer & closer so that you just have near simultaneous activity in several directions. This whole “decorative” cycle has lasted a remarkably long time! Simultanaity may have the effect of extending the life of all trends by ensuring that the point of over-exposure takes longer to get to. And yes, this is all just theoretical waffle just barely related to the topic.


ilovecolors
5.Jun.2008 10.58am
ilovecolors's picture

Maybe I’m wrong, but IMHO Emigre fonts look a bit undecided, they don’t know if they want to be revolutionary or conservative, particulary, Mrs. Eaves. What was the aim of this project? a traditional font? a revolutionary font? it’s certainly not a font we needed, and it doesn’t have any special background like Baskerville did, an special and strong motivation that lead to the font that couldn’t have been done in any other way. Emigre is certainly special in the experimental field, although it’s weak for a functional type, as we see in the Black Hawk Down cover.
For a eighties based project it’s cool, but Emigre fonts are more like art, and I wouldn’t be using them for something functional.


rs_donsata
5.Jun.2008 12.01pm
rs_donsata's picture

I made a book in Triplex last year. I just felt the face served the purpose of an indigenous cookbook with it’s brusque yet elegant italic. Before this I have only seen Triplex used twice on flyers but I must say I live in Mexico and was 8 years old in 1990.

Héctor


James Puckett
5.Jun.2008 1.28pm
James Puckett's picture

I’m going to flip my take on this thread and list the Emigre types I would still love to use on a project:

Tribute: What a great book this can make.
Fairplex: This would be great for faux old-fashioned posters.
Matrix II: My next business card will be Matrix as a flip of the just-text-in-Univers design I use now. And I really want to use the ornaments somewhere.
Vista: This would be nice for my Earth-mother clients
Modula: On the cover of a fashion magazine
Priori: As a titling face


bieler
7.Jun.2008 12.43am
bieler's picture

Ha! Journal is hands down the best thing Emigre ever delivered. Emigre started out in the PostScript Type 3 years (the only free font format licensing around) and learned the lessons of optimizing for low-resolution output devices quite well. There are very few typefaces that actually look better at smaller size. Journal is one of them. If it looks slightly Czech, well, it is, can’t do any better than that. As Goudy said, those old guys stole all our best ideas (I paraphrase).

Gerald