Frogs Titling

Primary tabs

68 posts / 0 new
Last post
Addison Hall's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Oct 2003 - 11:00am
Frogs Titling
0

Earlier this year, I picked up a book in New Orleans containing two Greek plays: The Frogs and The Birds. The former is set Fleischmann with a great all caps display type. The following is based on (not exactly) those letters.

Frogs sample

I am looking to create a titling font with the fine lines of Bodoni or Didot, but more Baroque in flavor. I suppose the actual types could be a display version of Fleischmann. I’ll post the printed sample when I get a chance.

Thanks,
Addison

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

Very pretty! But do note that this is much more sedate than what F’man actually made.

hhp

Eduardo Omine's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 - 6:08am
0

Good point about the caps spacing, Hrant.
The uneven color in ‘Courage’, for example, can be solved by adjusting the sidebearings (and maybe using some kerning).

What about making it lighter?

Addison Hall's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Oct 2003 - 11:00am
0

Nice illustration, Juan, I understand what you mean. I guess I’m still developing that sense of balance between the letterforms and the spaces between the letterforms. I don’t use measurements all that much, perhaps I should…

Hrant, I’ve made a note to remind you about the Fleischmann specimen. I can’t believe you can get an Enschede specimen from a library—the bookstores here (Mississippi) don’t know what a type specimen is… but we have the blues. Anyway…

I need to get that Carter book, I’d like to see the V&A font as well.

Eduardo, the spacing was done in the layout (actually slapped together) so it doesn’t really reflect the sidebearings. The sidebearings really haven’t been set yet—I still haven’t finished all the letters. So maybe the spacing would solve the problem (or help)?

Thanks,
Addison

Eduardo Omine's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 - 6:08am
0

carter - victoria & albert titling

“Above is a reproduction of the original artwork for Victoria & Albert Titling (1979) commissioned by Derek Birdsall for a series of museum guides for the Victoria & Albert Museum.”
(from Margaret Re, “Typographically Speaking — The Art of Matthew Carter”, page 38)

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

Hmmm. No match.
OK, now I’ll have to unfurl the Enschede… Monday can wait — I’ll do it now.

hhp

Chase J Goitia's picture
Offline
Joined: 12 Apr 2004 - 11:14pm
0

Addison, I really like the slight concavity to the serifs. I thought it was an optical illusion initially, the subtle motion is really quite nice.

It’d be awesome if you included ornaments done in woodcut style to match the facing page of that play.

Tiffany Wardle's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Jul 2001 - 11:00am
0

Are we looking for a Fleischmann? Or something similar? Don’t forget about Dutch Type Library’s version.

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

OK, I checked: I’d be suprised if it’s not a Rosart.

(BTW, Eduardo: I forgot to say thanks.)

hhp

Addison Hall's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Oct 2003 - 11:00am
0

Double thanks, Eduardo. Carter’s had his hands on more stuff than I realized.

I had assumed the sample was Fleischmann—at least a display version because it doesn’t match DTL’s. I’m not familiar with Rosart… should I post a sample in the ID section?

Chase, ornaments would be cool. I may give it a try.

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

> should I post a sample in the ID section?

Sure, although chances are slim you’ll find a Rosart expert there (or anywhere, in public).
Do you really want/need to know exactly what metal font what you show is based on?

hhp

Addison Hall's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Oct 2003 - 11:00am
0

Nah, I don’t really need to know, but because you think it may Rosart, I’m interested in knowing more. So…

Rosart sample

I found this in “Treasury of Alphabets and Lettering” attributed to Jacques Francois Rosart. The forms are similar to the ones from my “Frog” book, so you may be right. I want to find out more about him.

I’m getting off track with this, so I apologize. The source I’m using is mainly an inspiration—I wanted an exercise in something more refined than my last effort (which I’m still working on), but I think I need to work on the uniqueness. I’ll post a slightly revised sample soon.

Thanks,
Addison

Addison Hall's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Oct 2003 - 11:00am
0

Yeah, it looks more like something from Caslon maybe. A big difference in the book’s font is that the serifs are flat, as well as the tops and bottoms of the “flat” glyphs (T, E, F). I chose to make them slightly concave.

Here’s the title page from the book:

title page

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

That must be from the Enschede book (although probably the -almost as good- 1978 edition, which is much more common). This will have to wait until Monday though…

hhp

Tiffany Wardle's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Jul 2001 - 11:00am
0

Is it me, or do most people think that “display” implies a little narrower?

As it happens Dwiggins used Rosart as a reference for his typeface Stuyvesant. I have here to images. One from DBU’s greatest contribution to type geeks everywhere and second from the files in Kentucky (or at least that is what my notes say.)



Addison Hall's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Oct 2003 - 11:00am
0

Thanks for those scans, Tiffany. It turns out that DTL is working on a digital Rosart.

When you think of display as narrow, are you thinking of the display version of a text font?

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

Display can be thought of as narrow because there’s generally more of an incentive to reduce linebreaks than in text.

hhp

Charles Gibbons's picture
Offline
Joined: 5 May 2004 - 12:29pm
0

{This is a repost; sorry to repeat if repeating}

Tiffany’s sample is a Rosart. Take a look at pages 7-16 of the 1806 Enschede specimen. Van Krimpen was probably using the Dubbelde Text Capitalen size — hard to say from the scan. It popped up on a few dust jackets in the last decade [three vols of Dostoyevsky from Knopf, Sabato’s “Angel of Darkness” [Viking?]]. Probably cut-and-paste there.

Yup. Working on my own version too.

<cg>

Tiffany Wardle's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Jul 2001 - 11:00am
0

Hrant makes a more valid point about it than I would have. However, I also think that at display sizes the words need to be narrower … similar to better reading happens in shorter column widths. Also, narrower is more elegant.

Addison Hall's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Oct 2003 - 11:00am
0

I’ll be brave here and voice my opinion. (Gulp!) In this case, I like the broad letters—they have a bold, stately appearance that you couldn’t knock over if you tried. In fact, that may have been one of the initial elements that appealed to me. Their forms and thick/thin relationships make them elegant. (I’m talking about the letters from the book, not mine.)

In fact, I don’t see this type being used for setting sentences or paragraphs. Titling may not be the right word, but I had assumed its purpose was for setting titles, two or three words and such.

Tiffany Wardle's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Jul 2001 - 11:00am
0

Don’t feel like you have to be brave Addison. (looking again at the letters at the top of this thread) I think this … ok, any type design .. would be dead boring if it all followed the same so-called “norm”. I do like these shapes. Perhaps I spoke too soon. But, in some display situations it is fun to be able to use it LARGE. If the letters are too wide it often won’t work. That’s all.

:-)

Chase J Goitia's picture
Offline
Joined: 12 Apr 2004 - 11:14pm
0

Addison, I concur on the stately appearance the face has, especially that it’s enhanced by the width of the seifs and the letters as a whole. Wide letters enable you to use looser tracking for heightened drama without looking too late-90s.

You could always do a supplementary condensed titling face if you felt the need for one.

Jean F Porchez's picture
Offline
Joined: 7 Jan 2003 - 11:00am
0

To be more complete, my classe did a Rosart couple years ago, in four optical sizes. Note the smaller caps sizes in the Rosart 1. Indeed the Rosart 2 and 3 are interpolated but in fact follow quite precisely the original sizes cut at the time, who confirm Summer Stone assertion when they have done ITC Bodoni in similar way.

http://perso.ensad.fr/%7eensadtypo/fontes.html#rosart

Juan Pablo De Gregorio's picture
Joined: 19 Aug 2003 - 11:00am
0

Muy bonita fuente, me recuerda mucho a la tiffany, ya que tienen una lectura muy similar.

Creo eso si que debes fijarte un poco en las proporciones de los caracteres problem

Addison Hall's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Oct 2003 - 11:00am
0

Tiffany, I definitely would use this AS BIG AS I COULD GET IT (I may just need more room). Sorry to be wimpy, but I don’t have the background some of you do. I’ve never even heard of Rosart. It’s just a little intimidation and I’ll get over it. You guys are great.

Chase, thanks for the thumbs-up.

Jean, I wish I lived in France so I could take your class.

-Addison

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

JF: pretty nice.
Question: how do you get multiple designers to work on one font? Collaborative type design has always seemed tricky — do you separate the tasks, or the glyphs, or what?

Addison: If you’re worried about duplicating the work of JF’s students (although it doesn’t seem finished — not that that should have been the point of the class), you might consider making your version more idiosyncratic (either by replicating the funkiness in the original Rosart fonts or maybe even by putting in your own). Another option though would be to make a “clean” font but inspired by Rosart, instead of a revival.

hhp

paul d hunt's picture
Offline
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 - 11:00am
0

narrower is more elegant

in what context? i find myself strangely attracted to wider letterforms for more display-type work. maybe i’m just an anomaly tho.

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

> i find myself strangely attracted to wider letterforms

Well, maybe you in fact prefer friendliness over elegance?

hhp

paul d hunt's picture
Offline
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 - 11:00am
0

LOL! interesting! i hadn’t thought of it quite that way.
Hrant you should have a side stint in type psychology. Seems we’ve had a couple conversations concerning these types of topics (ie the gender thread). How many folks do you think are in need of such services? (sorry didn’t mean to hijack the thread, don’t mind me)

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

Font Freudology. How many people really need it? Probably the same number as those who really need more fonts. Like maybe 5.

hhp

Kent Lew's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 - 11:00am
0

RE: Tiffany’s scans above —

The first is from DBU (plate 214 in Vol. II). The second is a reproduction of the first: Griffith made photographic enlargements of several letters for Dwiggins (circa May 1943). You can’t tell too well in the posted scan, but the faint circling of certain letters indicates Dwiggins’s best guess at which particular instances Griffith enlarged for him. (Incidentally, this type was just Rosart’s caption for the real subject of DBU’s plate: Rosart’s scripty caract

Kent Lew's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 - 11:00am
0

Addison, your inspiration does have a lot in common with some of Rosart’s larger titling [all caps] fonts. Here is a sample from the 1993 facsimile of the Ensched

Tiffany Wardle's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Jul 2001 - 11:00am
0

Thanks, Kent. ;) I’m sure my dissertation talks about it somewhat, I was just too lazy to open it up.

re WIDE V. NARROW — Sometimes, I notice people using the small caps of typefaces as the display. They must agree that wide is more stately. I’ll go out on a limb and just say that in a sans wide can be nice. But for a serif, especially something that is supposed to evoke elegance, I find typefaces on the narrow (not condensed) side to be more elegant.

Tiffany Wardle's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Jul 2001 - 11:00am
0

AND

I agree with Kent. Ignore me and do your own thang!

Addison Hall's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Oct 2003 - 11:00am
0

Thanks, Juan. If I understand correctly, you’re saying the proportions of the L, T, V, A, W, etc. need more air?

(Sorry, the Google translator didn’t help much)

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

I think elegance and stateliness are somewhat close, and both are better evoked with narrowness. Width can evoke confidence though, so maybe that’s its relation to stateliness.

hhp

Kent Lew's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Apr 2002 - 11:00am
0

Oh no; don’t ignore Tiffany. She often has good observations. Instead, take it all in … and do your own thang!

— K.

Jean F Porchez's picture
Offline
Joined: 7 Jan 2003 - 11:00am
0

To answer to Hrant and Addison questions, I posted here more detailed answer, as seems bit of topic on this thread. Feel free to answer there directly or to open a new thread on typophile.

William Berkson's picture
Offline
Joined: 26 Feb 2003 - 11:00am
0

About the width of capitals, I believe that for a titling face there is often more variation in width than in caps made with an eye to lower case. Personally, I think it is more elegant to have not uniformity in wide or narrow, but the variation, such as in Forum caps or Zapf’s Michelangelo titling face.

I suspect that small caps may often work better for titling because they are designed and spaced for all caps setting, as opposed to regular caps, which are done with an eye to the harmony with the lower case. I am just guessing, and I’d be interested in hearing from those knowledgeable about this.

Jonathan Hoefler discusses the tension between the two goals for caps in an interesting interview at daidala.com.

Addison Hall's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Oct 2003 - 11:00am
0

I NEVER ignore anything any of you have to say—that’s mainly how I’m learning—and I greatly appreciate everyone’s input. Thanks for taking an interest. Kent, thanks for that page scan, it’s awesome! It should help out a lot.

I’m working on posting a new sample…

Jean F Porchez's picture
Offline
Joined: 7 Jan 2003 - 11:00am
0

William, your first paragraph is very true and agree with it. Caps designed alone ar not spaced same way. Proportions are generally different too.

But, as Small Caps designs are generally bolder, less contrasted in booth width proportion and weight, I’m not sure to agree with your supposition?

Just compare caps and Sc from my Sabon Next to see what i mean
http://www.linotype.com/53159/sabonnext-family.html

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

JF, thanks once more. Your method seems pretty optimal.

> I think it is more elegant to have not uniformity

It’s also better for reading.

The one interesting thing I’ve discovered about caps is that you have to let them be their own alphabet (for better or worse): you simply can’t make them harmonize with the lc too much (unless it’s a funky font). This is an anti-Modernism realization.

hhp

William Berkson's picture
Offline
Joined: 26 Feb 2003 - 11:00am
0

Thanks, JFP, for your correction and clarification. I have been using Minion SC for subtitles in a project I am working on, and found it worked better than the caps, but that is not actually a title, and there probably the smoothness of the small caps setting helps. I will look at this and check where I am using caps vs small caps with a better awarenes of the difference.

But I guess for Addison, who wants to work on an all-caps titling face the point holds: he would best be guided by looking at other titling faces, or compare those faces which have both regular and titling caps.

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

BTW, Addison, if you’re feeling brave you might make ligated caps (like in Mantinia). And if you want linguistics as a guide, here are the most frequent pairs and doubles in English:

pairs.gif
hhp

Chase J Goitia's picture
Offline
Joined: 12 Apr 2004 - 11:14pm
0

Uppercase discretionary ligatures are very classy, and come in quite handy on occasion.

Hrant, that list contains the most frequently occurring pairs in printed English, right? Not spoken & printed

Eduardo Omine's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Jan 2003 - 6:08am
0

I guess Juan actually means the opposite.
And I agree with him. ‘T’, for example, could be slightly narrower.
OTOH, ‘H’ is narrow, and its middle could be lower.
Anyway, it looks nice (although it reminds me of some 70s/ITC things too).

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

Yes, written English.
The main difference between written and spoken English is “you”, which occurs much more in the latter. So Addison, if you think your all-caps font might be used for setting a lot of yelling dialogue, adding “YO” to that list might be useful.  ;-)

BTW, I also have a list of trigraphs.

hhp

Addison Hall's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Oct 2003 - 11:00am
0

That’s a lot of ligatures. If this turns into something I’m really proud of, I may give that a shot. I thought about making an engraved version, kind of like the sample I posted earlier.

Addison Hall's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Oct 2003 - 11:00am
0

Yo, yo, post them trigraphs if you get a chance.

Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

“Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in.”
You guys will be my financial ruin.

Addison, it’s many pages, so I need time to sort, encode, etc. But I’ll have to get it ready for my talk in Greece at the end of June anyway (“Designers of the World, Ligate!”), so maybe by the end of this month.

hhp

Addison Hall's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Oct 2003 - 11:00am
0

Hrant, don’t sweat it if it’s lots of trouble—seriously. Turns out we (my office) have a copy of the Typographic Journal with that list of frequent pairs. I’ll have to read that article.