There are lots of customers who just don’t do stylistic sets and the work involved is more than making several versions. I can understand the choice FB made.
You’re waving a red flag there, pal.
Now I’m looking at the sturdy Georgia and thinking, wish I could spruce that up.
But this is a site where users can’t get to specify their own choice of text face.
Pity.
5.Aug.2008 4.59am
The good thing: With Sloop, SHOUTING looks even more stupid.
5.Aug.2008 5.29am
There will always be people who find ways to complain. My only complaint is that I don’t have the $$ to buy it.
Oh, and that nine styles might become unwieldy. Why not just one style with a lot of Opentype variants?
Peace,
JT
5.Aug.2008 7.05am
Hang on Sloopy, Sloopy hang on!
JT,
There are lots of customers who just don’t do stylistic sets and the work involved is more than making several versions. I can understand the choice FB made.
ChrisL
5.Aug.2008 7.06am
Oh, and Paul, I am not complaining! Sloop is a beaut! :-P
ChrisL
5.Aug.2008 7.39am
*shrugs* it makes my profile say “it_the_ninja” though...never enough room for swashes...
Peace,
JT
5.Aug.2008 8.16am
Now this site looks classy and this forces me to open a good bottle of red wine, right now. ;-)
>The good thing: With Sloop, SHOUTING looks even more stupid.
Hehe!
5.Aug.2008 8.31am
...no one can complain...
You’re waving a red flag there, pal.
Now I’m looking at the sturdy Georgia and thinking, wish I could spruce that up.
But this is a site where users can’t get to specify their own choice of text face.
Pity.
7.Aug.2008 12.17pm
ChrisL
7.Aug.2008 1.52pm
Wow, on the outskirts of legibility....like trying to read the word “minimum” in in a thick blackletter.
Peace,
JT
7.Aug.2008 9.17pm
Or like printing a wedding invitation using 2 foot high Cleartype :-)
ChrisL