looking for ink-saving display typeface

Primary tabs

10 posts / 0 new
Last post
ghurman's picture
Offline
Joined: 7 Jul 2007 - 7:42am
looking for ink-saving display typeface
0

i'm looking for a ink-saving display typeface. it should have the following properties:

1. sans or display.
2. contemporary (not cheap looking)
4. ink-saving.

we air brush a lot of ink that is expensive on large banners up to 100 meters in length using laser-cut patterns. i have found a good, but still not the best choice: Soho Gothic Medium. do you know a better typeface for this?

Chris Keegan's picture
Offline
Joined: 11 Nov 2002 - 3:40pm
0

How does Soho Gothic Medium save ink? Just curious how that works. The first type styles that come to mind would be stencil types, or dot matrix types where the letters are not solid.

Florian Hardwig's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Feb 2007 - 6:41am
0
Juergen Weltin's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Jan 2006 - 6:31am
0

You can find a lot of ink-saving light weights here.

darrel's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Feb 2003 - 6:03pm
0

Large banners would seem to need large type to be legible from a distance. So, it seems that ink-heavy faces would be the best choice from a design perspective. As mentioned, perhaps line screening or otherwise patterning the face would allow you to save a few bucks.

ghurman's picture
Offline
Joined: 7 Jul 2007 - 7:42am
0

mmm, dot matrix may work in some cases. stencil typefaces can look odd to the customers.

how does Soho Gothic save ink: look at the upercase G of Soho Gothic it's minimalistic but still an easily recognizable G. another thing about Soho Gothic: it's an attractive, contemporary typeface, neither that bold like Helvetica Regular nor awkward like Arial.

we don't print backgrounds, only headlines and logos. the usable letter weight of Soho Gothic for our purpose is Medium or Regular. bold and black would take up too much surface. hairline is not display except if you're lucky. in rare cases we can use stencil and hairlines.

the banners are outdoor ads. it's about the effective surface that the letters occupy, the smaller the surface the less ink will be spent. we buy ink in gallons.
i would like to take bold typefaces but the ink is simply expensive at large banner sizes.

Craig Eliason's picture
Offline
Joined: 19 Mar 2004 - 1:44pm
0
Hrant H Papazian's picture
Joined: 3 May 2000 - 11:00am
0

This is a peculiar question! :-)
It sounds like you're not looking for huge savings, which makes this quest seem hopeful. Very light weights can't work for functional reasons, but here are some ideas:

- Fonts with heavy trapping, like FB Amplitude or this:
http://www.type.fi/SuomiTang.html

- Fonts that are made of up interrupted patterns, like:
http://www.myfonts.com/fonts/letraset/cabaret/cabaret/
(But contemporary.)

- I think the best solution might simply be inline fonts:
http://www.myfonts.com/search?search%5Btext%5D=inline

hhp

Russell McGorman's picture
Joined: 25 May 2006 - 10:01am
0

the less ink you use per square foot of text, the lighter the average colour, and the less visual impact you have, so what's the real savings?

If you use outline fonts, or an interupted pattern, you'll have more cutting time to make the paterns, which is probly more expensive than the ink.

Maybe just apply a lighter coat or thin the ink?

-=®=-

Nick Shinn's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Jul 2003 - 11:00am
0

If upper and lower case, Futura Mini or Avant Garde.

- large x-height (less ink used in capitals)
-"missing" bits on letters, such as no tail on "t" and "j"
-minimal, single-bowl forms of a and g.

Alternatively, a face that works well with ample letterspacing, such as DIN or Interstate, because it can be used smaller.

Also consider a good editor, for shorter words, and the use of understatement and "white space" to convey your message.