New to Typophile? Accounts are free, and easy to set up.
I've been designing fonts for about a year now, pure hobby. I've always felt that, because I was never properly educated in type design, I'm missing out on a lot of stuff. Nevertheless I try. In the last weeks I've come up with this design, inspired on the beautiful typefaces by Gerard Unger. Like his type, I'd like to give it a feel of (post) modernism and clarity.
Like I said, I'm not a professional, not even an educated type designer. However, I'd like you all to comment, good and bad...
Thanks in advance!
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Gerard 3.0.pdf | 221.26 KB |
8 Feb 2009 — 8:25am
You've either made superb progress in type design over just a year, or you're staying too close to Unger*. He's a great role model in type, but I still think most individuals can contribute much more from themselves than from imitation. The question of what's too close for comfort is a classic and thorny issue in type design, and requires great introspection as well as listening to advice. But quite possibly I'm making a mountain out of a molehill!
* I'm not an expert in Unger's work so I can't pinpoint too much.
Anyway, of itself it's quite nice.
The weakest glyph is the "j" - it needs a braver descender.
Concerning self-education: many of our great names in the craft have been self-taught. There are pros and cons (just as there are with formal education) but I have to think that in this age of 100,000 fonts it nicely promotes originality. The main problem is that you can take a few extra years to get to the same spot (although the journey might very well be the biggest prize).
hhp
8 Feb 2009 — 9:14am
Thanks for your input, HHP.
For more information on and type designs by Gerard Unger, see http://www.gerardunger.com.
9 Feb 2009 — 10:20pm
Looks very nice.. any more samples to see?
10 Feb 2009 — 12:39am
I'm working on the caps and glyphs. It's nice to know you all, well, you two, like it. I'll have a close look at the 'j' and repost.
Thanks!
11 Feb 2009 — 11:27am
I like what you've done so far. I'd make only one comment for now. I wonder if the descender are a bit too long. I think it is longer than the ascender and it could be a bit shorter. It's more visible in the y and the g. Keep going.
André
11 Feb 2009 — 11:36am
Also, there is a bump on some letters. You could try to correct it.
André
11 Feb 2009 — 12:25pm
> the descender are a bit too long.
Good call (I'm embarassed to have missed that).
hhp
12 Feb 2009 — 12:48pm
r's ear needs more substance in upright and even more in italic.
I'd work more on the a - it looks clumsy to me.
Diagonal letters like wxv (not always easy to do) are well done here.