They don’t want to read the EULAs and they don’t want to buy the fonts. They just want to RIP the job, print it, and go on to the next. This is how they put the responsibility on you to get it right. They also dislike making changes and sending proofs out, which delays their schedule.
Look around at all your alternatives and find the shop that has the right presses, operators, and work flow for you.
Sounds like one of those two guys with a digital press in a garage working on tiny margins shops. Just outline the type and let the client live with the results; this is what he gets for being a tightwad.
James, it is a relatively big print shop (relative to the place where I live), but the mentality is still that of “two guys with digital press etc.”, very common in Italy (and particularly in central Italy, I suspect I also share the same behaviour). Another printer months ago rasterized everything before printing without even calling me, and then he tried to put the blame on me for the results.
Probably what they did was to create a workflow where font issues are over! All is converted to outlines by the designer. They are saving big time on the operation, cause fonts issues suck.
A side-effect to this practice is that the files will be way bigger then if the text was regular embed fonts on PDFs, costing more time and memory to convert files.
Hinting is irrelevant at 2,000+ dpi used with offset printing today. I'm assuming this is "printing," not xerography. In fact, in the early PostScript days, I use to strip the hints out of fonts because they sometimes caused trouble. Type was output to repro paper at "only" 1,200 dpi. But that was a true 1,200, not tricked.
Probably what they did was to create a workflow where font issues are over!
I think you are correct. I suppose the so-called workflow was created to avoid problems and be able to print ‘just-in-time’ with the lowest prices. The quality problems are the last thing to be considered in that context. I find the approach really depressing.
3 Mar 2009 — 6:26am
They don’t want to read the EULAs and they don’t want to buy the fonts. They just want to RIP the job, print it, and go on to the next. This is how they put the responsibility on you to get it right. They also dislike making changes and sending proofs out, which delays their schedule.
Look around at all your alternatives and find the shop that has the right presses, operators, and work flow for you.
3 Mar 2009 — 7:04am
Thanks, in the specific case the shop was chosen by my client : (
3 Mar 2009 — 7:53am
Check it carefully, convert it, and charge the client to redo the preflight if they come back with changes.
3 Mar 2009 — 9:07am
Sounds like one of those two guys with a digital press in a garage working on tiny margins shops. Just outline the type and let the client live with the results; this is what he gets for being a tightwad.
3 Mar 2009 — 10:58am
James, it is a relatively big print shop (relative to the place where I live), but the mentality is still that of “two guys with digital press etc.”, very common in Italy (and particularly in central Italy, I suspect I also share the same behaviour). Another printer months ago rasterized everything before printing without even calling me, and then he tried to put the blame on me for the results.
3 Mar 2009 — 11:09am
Perhaps you could enlighten them to the PDF workflow.
5 Mar 2009 — 2:08pm
Probably what they did was to create a workflow where font issues are over! All is converted to outlines by the designer. They are saving big time on the operation, cause fonts issues suck.
A side-effect to this practice is that the files will be way bigger then if the text was regular embed fonts on PDFs, costing more time and memory to convert files.
Tell them!
5 Mar 2009 — 2:22pm
I also think that the print quality would suffer at text sizes, as hints are out. Is this right?
5 Mar 2009 — 5:50pm
Hinting is irrelevant at 2,000+ dpi used with offset printing today. I'm assuming this is "printing," not xerography. In fact, in the early PostScript days, I use to strip the hints out of fonts because they sometimes caused trouble. Type was output to repro paper at "only" 1,200 dpi. But that was a true 1,200, not tricked.
10 Mar 2009 — 11:45am
Probably what they did was to create a workflow where font issues are over!
I think you are correct. I suppose the so-called workflow was created to avoid problems and be able to print ‘just-in-time’ with the lowest prices. The quality problems are the last thing to be considered in that context. I find the approach really depressing.
12 Mar 2009 — 10:38am
- - Forgive - -
—— O H ——
—Highest Sireness—
= for =
I h a v e
*S*E*E*N*