consistent width symbols?

Primary tabs

3 posts / 0 new
Last post
Craig Eliason's picture
Offline
Joined: 19 Mar 2004 - 1:44pm
consistent width symbols?
0

In a proportional font with tabular numbers, would you expect other symbols to share the width of the figures? If so, which ones?
plus, multiply, divide, etc.?
equal, greaterthan, etc.?
dollar, sterling, yen, currency, etc.?
pound?
asciitilde? logical not?
percent? perthousand?!

Nick Shinn's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Jul 2003 - 11:00am
0

There was a thread on this...

***

Anyway, I don't think there is any need, and it really compromises the appearance of glyphs, especially the Euro symbol.
The reason is that figure positioning in columns is now done by tabbing, rather than filling space with quads.

Having said that, I do try and make the Dollar and Sterling tab figure width.

Actually, it's a good idea if you're thinking about tab figure width, to consider designing all figures in a family to the same width from the outset -- lining and oldstyle, different weights, roman and italic.

Craig Eliason's picture
Offline
Joined: 19 Mar 2004 - 1:44pm
0

Thanks Nick, and sorry about the redundant thread. I now see the original one [[http://typophile.com/node/41191|here]] (asked in an eerily similar way!).